1. You guys don't like Gandhi, you call him pro-muslim ... some refer to him as doing the biggest damage to India since partition. RSS guy killed Mahatama in cold blood.
2. You don't like Sonia. She is Italian, not born Indian. She has friends like Quattrochi.
So, both Gandhiji and Sonia are your enemies, yet you don't like Sonia using Gandhi's last name ... what do you care guys? you don't like them either .... they are both enemies ... they like each other ... Sonia uses Gandhi as last name despite any biological relationship ... still why do you care?
RE:Attention BJP and RSS supporters
by Aromal Lilly on Oct 09, 2007 05:05 AM Permalink
A Jew by name Aaron Hoffman, changing his last name to "Saud" before marrying a Muslim Saudi girl and their entire children getting "Saud" surname and trying to be the descendant of the ruling family in Saudi Arabia... :)
RE:Attention BJP and RSS supporters
by ab on Oct 09, 2007 05:37 AM Permalink
RSS means only Brahmins Thakurs, no entries for SC, BC, ST, etc etc...get your knowledge right.....you being a Reddy may belong to the farming community hence you are not eligible to join RSS Nikkar Walas, yes you can join if they feel their numbers are dwindling.
RE:Attention BJP and RSS supporters
by Chet on Oct 09, 2007 07:14 AM Permalink
I think it is better for you to go and see How RSS works, rather then just critising. I am not RSS member, as a child once I visited RSS and liked it. They also teach about Geograpahy, Science etc.,. GK stuff.. YES.. they meant to save Hindus.. Yes they are becoming hardcore Hindu fundamentals due to psuedo-secularism, pro-muslim policies... Wake up.. See them from near and comment.. Reddy are from farming community and you can see large Reddys in RSS..
RE:Attention BJP and RSS supporters
by BP on Oct 09, 2007 05:14 AM Permalink
Reddy Reddy, there are a lot of these kind of blogs that support one theory or the others. I have also seen a blogs by some pakistanis that show gruesome pictures of mutilated bodies and claim that they were of muslims massacred by Hindus in India. I will have to be be extremely gullible to start believing this kind of bu** crap. Whatever grouse you guys have against Congress or Sonis Gandhi, at least have decency to not wash your dirty laundry in public when she has been invited as India's representative. I am NOT a supporter of Congress and specially Sonia but I think you guys are worse than the JKLF or Khalistani elements for washing your dirty linens in public with these kind of advertisements.
Mahatma fought to drive out the "whites", it is heartening to see now the same blood is trying to flatter another white - who is dividing the country on communal lines - to get a ticket to congress which he is desperately trying for. I mean..who is Arun Gandhi to talk about "Gandhian values"?LOL
RE:Arun Gandhi not Gandhian himself
by BP on Oct 09, 2007 05:20 AM Permalink
Srikanth: The Mahatma did not fight to drive out the "Whites". I doubt he had a recial prejudices like that. In that case, he would have said that all "anglo indians" should also be driven out. You seem to be the type that cannot simply think beyond the "black-white-brown" syndrome. In your eyes, any Indian who marries a white person is probably a "traitor". Why don't you appreciate that somebody from outside India wholeheartedly adopted the country, its rich culture, traditions, language and made every attempt to be as Indian as anybody else.
Based on your logic, I am sure you would be opposed if an India born person were to become a governor of your state ?????
RE:Arun Gandhi not Gandhian himself
by Loan Shark on Oct 09, 2007 04:56 AM Permalink
it wasn't the whites that Gandhiji fought against ... it was apartheid ... it was hate for the colored people that those whites had ... Abraham Lincoln led the union to a civil war to supress slavery in United States.
It was not whites that these leaders fought. They fought the attitude and designs of some whites who were against humanity.
RE:Arun Gandhi not Gandhian himself
by Arman on Oct 09, 2007 05:01 AM Permalink
Mahatam Gandhi fought colonizers and by the way they were all white. So he did fight white rulers.
RE:RE:Arun Gandhi not Gandhian himself
by BP on Oct 09, 2007 05:24 AM Permalink
He fought the colonizers not the whites. If he fought the whites, he would have been fighting Germans, Austrians, Swiss.....
Abraham Lincoln fought the confederates who were all white but only a foolish person would say that he faought the whites. But then maybe the fool did speak........
RE:Arun Gandhi not Gandhian himself
by Pradip Parekh on Oct 09, 2007 05:50 AM Permalink
usrely white goes with apartheid just as terror goes with mohamadism. trash by any other name will still stink.
RE:Arun Gandhi not Gandhian himself
by Marco Polo on Oct 09, 2007 04:48 AM Permalink
Congress (I) would have approached him and requested for damage-control.See election is around the corner.Sonia and Rahul made a fool of India's democracy in NY,so the image is very much lost.
RE:RE:Arun Gandhi not Gandhian himself
by Loan Shark on Oct 09, 2007 04:56 AM Permalink
I agree ... controversies like this generate a lot of publicity
Arun Gandhi, get a real job. Stop trying to live off grandpa's name. Yes, I know it's a comfy life compared to real work, but have some self-respect, and stop trying to cynically exploit your grandpa's name to make a living off it. Moral authority is not inherited through the genes, and so just because you claim to be a grandson, doesn't give you any moral authority. This isn't the Caliphate. Go and make a career of your own, instead of trying to follow (ride) on grandpa's legacy.
RE:Arun, Get a Job
by stav on Oct 09, 2007 04:30 AM Permalink
well those retired gujrati taxi drivers should get themselves a job. Next time they collect money for such an ad in the temple in NYC, they better let us know what it is going to be spent for.
RE:Arun, Get a Job
by Sadasiva Prasad on Oct 09, 2007 04:47 AM Permalink
What is your objection to the ad ? By quoting the Mahatma, Sonia implied that she belongs to his clan.It is better that Arun continues his kushy job and not dabble in his half-understood politics. I want to ask: has any party leader addressed the UN General Assembly before ?
RE:Arun, Get a Job
by BP on Oct 09, 2007 05:31 AM Permalink
Martin Luther King also quoted the Mahatma numeours times. Did he claim to "belong to his clan???" How about Nelson Mandela ? did he try to also latch on to the so called "clan" ? I feel very proud as an Indian if the whole world tries to quote the Mahatma and "latch on to his clan"
what crude logic was that ? Something wrong with the cognitive skills of the folks who issued the ad. These stupid Hindu fanactics. They have crossed the line that seperates pride for one own's religion and culture vs. hatred and disgust for others. If they would take the next step and start killing people of other religion/culture/races, they will be no different than the Bin Ladens of the world
RE:Arun, Get a Job
by Arman on Oct 09, 2007 05:06 AM Permalink
It is not unfortunate to have Mahatma Gandhi as great grandfather but it is unfortunate to claim to speak on his behalf. He is what Bush Jr is to Bush clan.
RE:From Khilafat to Godhra by NS Rajaram
by Sadasiva Prasad on Oct 09, 2007 04:51 AM Permalink
I do not think any other leader had done done somuch damage to India as did Jawaharlal Nehru. Kashmir, subsidising Haj pilgrims, Hindu Code bill are a few examples of his idiotic vision. But for the Mahatma's support to him,he would have been consigned to gutters even during his life time
RE:RE:From Khilafat to Godhra by NS Rajaram
by Ganapati Hegde on Oct 09, 2007 05:16 AM Permalink
You have hit the nail on the head. Nehru spoiled India's growth by all wrong policies, then came his daughter, perpetuating the License Permit Raj, then came his granson with " Bofors"
I don't know, what is in store for India, if his great grandson comes to power.
The " Mughal rule" in India has been perpetuated by the Nehru- gandhi dynasty.
RE:RE:RE:From Khilafat to Godhra by NS Rajaram
by ab on Oct 09, 2007 05:52 AM Permalink
What happened when Vajpayee was in power, they made money on the coffins... Imported wheat and sugar from the killers of our army jawans and instigators of Kargil - namely Shariff and Co. Openly took bribes to be later caught by the camera men.
Shame Shame....Chullu bhar paani mein doob maro....yaa nai tho hamesha ke liye chup hojaao....
INDIA IS SHINING Yes, when POOR ARE HUNGRY DALITS ARE OPENLY PARADED NAKED IN THE PUBLIC DALITS ARE RAPED MUSLIM HOUSES ARE BURNED & THEIR MEN & CHILDREN SLAUGHTERED CHRISTIAN NUNS ARE RAPED, FATHERS ATTACKED, CHURCHES BURNED.
This is the great rule of the RSS Nikkarwala's..
Its all happening out there in the middle.
Before pointing the finger, get your house right...
What Nehru's family did, none of the present day Indian politicians can do. He fought for India's independence, took up a simple life inspite of being a rich man's son, became a Gandhian, his daughter fought a war with Pakistan and brought it down to its knees, split Pakistan in to 2, and finally died to a bullet fired by her own security gaurd, to her son goes the entire credit of this modern hitech India, computers and state of the art technologies in hospitals, railway reservation, airline reservation.
The Nehru dynasty doesnt boast of their achievements in public like a CHINDI CHOR does, but seeks vote from liberal and secular people and they have always won the whole of India not just a pocket of the country.
RE:From Khilafat to Godhra by NS Rajaram
by CatchTwentyTwo on Oct 09, 2007 04:34 AM Permalink
Despite the above stunning statistics, the idea is to be inclusive in a democracy. Once you have parity in per capita incomes, female participancy etc., these substantial concessions will be curtailed.
As for the Haj Bill, muslims have to travel abroad for the same while Hindus do not have to. Moreover, it is essential to their religion to do so. A hindu is not compelled to visit a particular shrine and does not need incentives to do so.
Relax, live and let live. These are minor issues and the amount of money you specify is miniscule for the amount of goodwill you get from the same. Also, by living in harmony and by enjoying the culture of muslims (please dont harp on terrorism, you can read this as food, artisanship etc.) muslims are enriching this country of theirs.
As a hindu, I dont feel any discrimination in India and I dont see any reason why a muslim should feel it as well. Considering the above statistics that you laid out, it concludes that India is inclusive. Please do not spoil this great tolerant country of ours by listening to the communal arguments that just want to incite hatred in you.
RE:From Khilafat to Godhra by NS Rajaram
by Sunny K on Oct 09, 2007 04:51 AM Permalink
Before you make such drug-induced statements,Mr Rajaram ,please visit the slums that Kashmiri Hindus live in after being forced to migrate out of their ancestral homes!I suggest that if you are actually economically productive-which is doubtful given your intellectual demise-that the Tax guys attach your assets and allot them to Pandit refugees.Wake up,the salary you get from the Saudis will not suffice to buy your sanity back!
RE:From Khilafat to Godhra by NS Rajaram
by ab on Oct 09, 2007 05:41 AM Permalink
I dont understand the sick and perverted mind of you guys.
This issue is about Sonia Gandhi delivering her speech at the UN and the great grandson of Gandhiji supporting her speech and criticizing the AD produced by some perverts.
What baffles me is from where does the Muslim bashing arises out of this?
I dont think nuts like you have no issue but to find and do some Muslim bashing?
But first get your knowledge and figures right and then come out of the hiding you mountain rat.
For Your Info
The Masjids do not take donations from every tom dick and harry in the street, and mind you one more thing...they are never collected with a force such as your Ganapathi or Navrathri collections.
Masjids never take grants from any governmental organisations, even their expenses and everyday donation boxes are opened in public and scrutinized to the last rupee.
Get your figures right you sick & pervert.
This is just the least and rough estimate of the Hajj & Umrah costs incurred by the Indian Muslims and these are paid to the govt of India. One more thing Hajj or Umrah is valid when performed on one's own hard earned money and not even borrowed money.
At least Rs 7,00,00,00,000 (70,000 people paying 1,00,000 Rs each) for Hajj & atleast a Rs 5,00,00,00,000 (1,00,000 people paying 50,000 Rs each).
This goes to Indian Govt Coffers, Indian govt provides subsidy to market its resources abroad such as its Airlines and means of transport etc etc....
Mr. Arun Gandhi is the right Grandson of Mahatma Gandhi(The immortal-teacher of the future Civillized World, with the new advancements).
The World owes to Mahatma Gandhi, till "the World , in a part, shows hatred & irresponssibilities, on the other parts of the World".
The World is still uncivillized & homiciding , till "the World would exploit the irresponssible excuses of defficiencies of the others(illegal immigrants, poor , disadvantaged or, misled peoples of the World) to be irresponsible cruel & homiciding ones, on the others".
Deportations(on the other country-peoples), or, hatred on the other country peoples(like of Sonia Gandhi), or, "to be torturesome-homicider & injustified, even on the criminal-foreigners, in any country, is not a right-teachings or, a right responssible justified civillized-attitudes, in any country of the World".
Mahatma Gandhi(throughout his whole-life's sacrifices) has tried to teach the future-World, the above-truth.
Thanks would be returned with thanks, (missiles would be replied "not by missiles" but by the "Laws & leaders, who would be responssibly busy to stop the Jobs & Investments on the World's Missile-Factories". We would not bite the Dog(if it would have bite us). We are civillized(we would chain the Dog, for the right medications, without biting the Dog).
"India, U.S.A., and the rest of the responssible-World" would must carry & erect this World's bitter-truth, for the every part of the present & future-World(till th
RE:Arun Gandhi is O.K. to be the Gandson of Mahatma Gandhi!
by Kumaraswamy Pillay on Oct 09, 2007 04:52 AM Permalink
I like the word parasite. Nehru -> parasite of gandhi. Indra -> parasite of nehru. Sanjay & Rajiv -> parasites of indra. Sonia -> parasite of rajiv. The above mentioned are all parasites of mother india. I give two hoots to them all. Read between by three fingers (particularly note my middle finger. coz this one is for Arun Gandhi, who is a parasite trying to live out of all of them)
RE:Arun Gandhi is O.K. to be the Gandson of Mahatma Gandhi!
by CatchTwentyTwo on Oct 09, 2007 05:03 AM Permalink
Going by this logic, that makes all Indians parasites, as collectively all of us elected the above great leaders to power. Whether you voted for them or not, they represent you in this democracy, which gives you a right to voice your opinion. So, if you can accept that you are a parasite as well, this stands to reason.
RE:RE:Arun Gandhi is O.K. to be the Gandson of Mahatma Gandhi!
by Loan Shark on Oct 09, 2007 05:04 AM Permalink
don't forget, they were all democratically elected to office .. they were chosen by the people whom they represnted and then chosen by the representatives to lead the country.
Their leadership is what makes India stand tall in comparison to Pakistan and Bangladesh who were cut out of the same piece of land ... aren't you proud of India's achievments in 60 years?
RE:Arun Gandhi is O.K. to be the Gandson of Mahatma Gandhi!
by Arman on Oct 09, 2007 05:19 AM Permalink
"don't forget, they were all democratically elected to office .. they were chosen by the people whom they represnted and then chosen by the representatives to lead the country."
That is a tragedy..like Bush is a tragedy for US. People do make mistakes.
These Gandhi killers called RSS have now learnt the brand value of "Gandhi" and are realizing the mistake they did all these years opposing the Gandhi ideology. Now they blame congress from taking political milage out of using Gandhi's name.
RE:Such ads in NYT must be ignored
by David on Oct 09, 2007 04:10 AM Permalink
loan shark is a converted christian. All he thinks are about the cross in India.
RE:Such ads in NYT must be ignored
by Loan Shark on Oct 09, 2007 04:14 AM Permalink
LOL .... dude, I am a hindu, and a devout one. I believe in fredom of religion and freedom of speech.
Sonia Gandhi is our leader. She leads the party in power. She was born in Italy, but she is an Indian now.
RE:Such ads in NYT must be ignored
by Sunny K on Oct 09, 2007 05:00 AM Permalink
Who needs (Islamic )terrorists for enemies when your (Hindu) friends are like "Loan Shark dude"?Hitler and Stalin also rose from obscurity -did that make them great? Sonia would have gotten nowhere but for the illogical charisma of the Nehru-Gandhi name among Biharis/UP/MPwalas,etc.Before you commit sacrilege by uttering Vande Mataram and contaminating the phrase,try getting your non-Hindu friends to sing it with you!
RE:Such ads in NYT must be ignored
by Loan Shark on Oct 09, 2007 04:40 AM Permalink
I am Sonia's fan purely on merit. You have to look up her history. She was put in a corner by Narsimha Rao. When he left, she fought her way back ... and to the top ... she could have become the PM.
Isn't she amazing? Don't her leadership skills impress you? Be honest ... screw your loyalty to BJP and answer.
RE:Such ads in NYT must be ignored
by Marco Polo on Oct 09, 2007 04:51 AM Permalink
Yes,I have seen enough of her history.Why would u say she was put in a corner by PVN? SHe was just a widow who happened to be from a former PM's house.We had SHastry's widow and many other widows in India.Would u say they were all put in the corner?Why should she fight back? Intolerance to see another Indian in her husband's chair?
She is disgusting,arrogant,manipulative and totally SUCKS!She can adorn the top post in a mafia gang,not the country
I salute the person or the organization who put that ad in New York Times.It is what a lot of Indians think,whether,Arun Gandhi like it or not.Sonia is not the person to represent India or Mahatma Gandhi in UN.Even Manmohan Singh could have been a better choice looking at his past history in politics,but certainly NOT Sonia,who stands for cementing of the Hindu-Muslim division,anti-Hindu stands,Nepotism,creating and maintaining a power center in a 'democracy',taking special previleges for self and family members,what all Mahatma Gandhi never did.So even when Arun Gandhi says she is an elected leader,he has to see the real thing.We have elected goons,killers and dacoits as our representatives in the past,so electing one is not a criterion to the glory of a person.Arun's lamentation "Who among us is so straightforward as to be able to speak on or about Sonia?" is nothing but a show.Yes,there are scores of us in India who go by the law and do things ethically and morally who can question this Gandhi lady.
RE:Arun,don't get upset. The ad shows the Indians' feelings about Sonia.
by Loan Shark on Oct 09, 2007 04:11 AM Permalink
I reject the ad but since we live in a democracy - both India and USA, I uphold the right of freedom of speech and hence it's just their way to get their message out. Besides, controversies are always good in a democracy. They generate publicity.
Just remember, there are some sangh parivar supporters who do not like Sonia Gandhi. There are others who like her. As for the people of India, especially those of Sonia Gandhi's constituency, they have elected Sonia Gandhi and have put their trust in her.
BJP has nothing on Sonia except for her foreign origin.
RE:Arun,don't get upset. The ad shows the Indians' feelings about Sonia.
by CatchTwentyTwo on Oct 09, 2007 04:54 AM Permalink
Hmm.. Sangh parivar and the minority did not elect her. Their only way to get back to power is to say she is not Indian. She is Indian not by the dress she wears, not by religion, not by caste, upbringing, or any other but by volition. She had the choice and she made hers. Now, I dont know what else she has to do to be an Indian.... perhaps jump on the funeral fire..? If she was%u2019nt half the Indian she is, she would have left India and gone back to Italy with whatever she had, to live peacefully and without having to face this kind of insult.
She was elected repeatedly to serve. She was elected to be the head of the largest party in the elected mandate. She can rightly be speaking for every one of us at the UN. If you think she should not be speaking for you, please vote her out "and her close friend Quatrochi."
This is just the spineless Indian way of criticizing someone. If you think you can serve India better since you were born in India, why dont you get elected and go through this kind of crap? I think that when she spoke at the UN, she spoke very well. So, I dont understand this fuss about her for talking of "Gandhian values".
The sangh parivars of India need to get elected to speak on behalf of India. Until then, they can oppose as a minority but they dont reflect the majority.
RE:RE:Arun,don't get upset. The ad shows the Indians' feelings about Sonia.
by Hari on Oct 09, 2007 04:29 AM Permalink
Forgot, the dollars she has sent to her family in Italy should be also be an issue.
RE:Arun,don't get upset. The ad shows the Indians' feelings about Sonia.
by Marco Polo on Oct 09, 2007 04:33 AM Permalink
Altogether,this lady has to be thoroughly investigated by the next non-Congress Govt.before it is too late.
RE:Arun,don't get upset. The ad shows the Indians' feelings about Sonia.
by Loan Shark on Oct 09, 2007 04:42 AM Permalink
Do you have any proof of dollars she sent to Italy? or are you just making an easy allegation
BTW, Italian currency was Lira before 2002, now Euro - not dollars ... LOL at your ignorance
RE:Arun,don't get upset. The ad shows the Indians' feelings about Sonia.
by uniquemachoman on Oct 09, 2007 06:52 AM Permalink
http://janataparty.org/kgb_sonia.html
RE:Arun,don't get upset. The ad shows the Indians' feelings about Sonia.
by Sunny K on Oct 09, 2007 05:01 AM Permalink
Since you apparently live in the US,do you realize that Sonia could never get to be president here because she was not born in the US?
RE:Arun,don't get upset. The ad shows the Indians' feelings about Sonia.
by CatchTwentyTwo on Oct 09, 2007 05:12 AM Permalink
Why should any person be denied that right? If a person is elected to power, he/she should be eligible to the highest post in the country. Anything else is discriminatory and non-inclusive.
Thankfully, India does not discriminate against Indian citizens, muslims, hindus, christians, sikhs, non-Indian born citizens etc.
Since no non-Indian born citizen comes to power if he/she does not prove to be an active campaigner for the people of the region, this rule is binding us all to elect and vote responsibly. Rest assured, this much is true today. We have elected them and they have a right.
Whether the US has it or not is none of my goddamn concern.
RE:Arun,don't get upset. The ad shows the Indians' feelings about Sonia.
by Marco Polo on Oct 09, 2007 05:25 AM Permalink
in a democracy there will be some rules.Arnold Schwarznegger can never be the President of USA,even when he is the Governor of california.He wasn't born in USA.Since India is all set to cosy up with usa,we should also follow that rule.MP alright,PM-no.
RE:RE:Arun,don't get upset. The ad shows the Indians' feelings about Sonia.
by CatchTwentyTwo on Oct 09, 2007 11:25 AM Permalink
You can always keep following someone else. Please dont ask the same for India.
There is no sense in following someone blindly. Please take a look at your comments and reanalyze. I am not trying to win an argument here. I am just hoping that Indians all over drop this prejudice and try to see some light, be liberal and be inclusive.
RE:STUPID ARUN GANDHI
by Loan Shark on Oct 09, 2007 04:04 AM Permalink
Sonia is an elected representative of Rae Bareily constituency. Everytime she has won by record margin. On top of it she is the president of UPA, the coalition that rules the country. So, she has been elected twice - by the people of Rae Barely and by the parliamentary members of UPA.
RE:STUPID ARUN GANDHI
by David on Oct 09, 2007 04:12 AM Permalink
dear loan shark
How is that related to Gandhi ? unless, sonia is using that name from her father-in law Feroze gandhi's last name...oh btw, Feroze was the biggest loser in the 60's and both Indira and Nehru were so relieved at Feroze's death
RE:STUPID ARUN GANDHI
by Marco Polo on Oct 09, 2007 04:17 AM Permalink
David,even Americans will support the Indian's when we stand up against this woman,but not some of our Sonia-Das Indians.Read about her and enjoy the rest of the day...and defeat her in the next election.Pass the word. http://janataparty.org/annexures/ann05p32.html
RE:RE:STUPID ARUN GANDHI
by Loan Shark on Oct 09, 2007 04:25 AM Permalink
David, Americans believe in democracy ... No American lawmaker has ever called upon Indians to reject Sonia or standup against her.
RE:STUPID ARUN GANDHI
by Marco Polo on Oct 09, 2007 04:29 AM Permalink
American president candidated don't go the easy way in American democracy like Ganddis in Indian version of democracy.They answer people,participate in live debates,people do consider their persona and their track record,not how many persons do padapjua for a person each morning.This is ridiculous.
RE:RE:RE:STUPID ARUN GANDHI
by Loan Shark on Oct 09, 2007 04:32 AM Permalink
so, they can have debates in India .... you are saying as though Vajpayee is a great debater and Sonia isn't ... LOL
They have political rallies in India ... it's a different culture ... people are hered to political rallies to muster support ... distributed food and clothes to get them there ... people come, show support, and then they vote
RE:STUPID ARUN GANDHI
by Marco Polo on Oct 09, 2007 04:39 AM Permalink
I'll bet my head on that..Vajpayee is a good debator,orator and leader,compared to a leass than average Sonia.
RE:RE:STUPID ARUN GANDHI
by Loan Shark on Oct 09, 2007 04:20 AM Permalink
Gandhi was Feroz's last name ... wasn't he known as Feroz Gandhi? Then Indira acquired that name from her husband ... Rajiv and Sanjay got the name Gandhi ... Sonia and Maneka got the name Gandhi.
Sonia and Maneka both have a last name of Gandhi ... one leads Congress ... the other woman is perhaps a BJP MP .. honestly, I don't know what she is ... just know she is an avid environmentalist.
RE:STUPID ARUN GANDHI
by Marco Polo on Oct 09, 2007 04:24 AM Permalink
No Loan it was not Gandhi,it was Khan Gandhy.It was changed prior to their wedding with Mahatma's blessings,even Nehru wasn't happy at this match.
RE:RE:STUPID ARUN GANDHI
by Loan Shark on Oct 09, 2007 04:30 AM Permalink
who cares if Nehru was happy or not ... a guy and a girl like each other ... they have attained majority ... they want to marry ... how does it matter if Nehru was in favor or not ... they got married ... they had kids ... the kid got married to an Italian ...and she now is India's leader
RE:RE:STUPID ARUN GANDHI
by Loan Shark on Oct 09, 2007 04:27 AM Permalink
who cares what his name used to be if it was Khan or Gandhe .... or Gowda or Gupta, or Vajpayee, or Jinnah .... it does not matter
He changed his last name to Gandhi ... you and I can do it too ... anyone can change their last name to whatever they want ... it's a free country
RE:STUPID ARUN GANDHI
by Loan Shark on Oct 09, 2007 04:51 AM Permalink
LOL ... marco polo ... you brought up Nehru's name didn't you ... maybe he screwed Lady mountbatten ... so what? he didn't rape her or did he?... if she fell for Nehru, then so be it ... if she wanted to be screwed by India's PM, what's yr problem?
RE:RE:STUPID ARUN GANDHI
by Marco Polo on Oct 09, 2007 05:14 AM Permalink
shows the family values and moral values of Gandhis.No wonder a Mathai could write things about Indira and him(banned in India)
RE:RE:STUPID ARUN GANDHI
by Marco Polo on Oct 09, 2007 04:44 AM Permalink
Wow! I don't question anyone's last name.It could be Mohammed either.I don't care.There was no need for Feroze to change his last name for this family who mistreated him soon enough.So much to show who those family memmbers really were.
And Nehru,the enchanter of Lady Mount Batton,a married woman!!!! Don't talk about him.And ord Mountbatton was India's best friend amonng British and Nehru was having an affair! Shame on him and his breed!Mountbatton's daughter only attested to this fact a few weeks ago in her book.
RE:RE:STUPID ARUN GANDHI
by Loan Shark on Oct 09, 2007 04:35 AM Permalink
Nothing ... just that Gandhiji asked Feroz to take on his name if it would make Nehru feel better about the reltionship. The guy took it.
Now, some 60 years later you question, why it was done ... it was definitely not done thinking that in 60 years Gandhi would be an expensive brand with worldwide recognition.
RE:RE:STUPID ARUN GANDHI
by Marco Polo on Oct 09, 2007 04:11 AM Permalink
Slaves elected her the second time.Don't consider that election.She is trash.read abt her and save yourself from this hero-worship
RE:STUPID ARUN GANDHI
by Loan Shark on Oct 09, 2007 04:17 AM Permalink
who cares about you, if you do not call it an election ... you are not the election commissioner .. or are you? the election commissioner calls it an election ... they declare the winner ... Sonia won fair and square ... she leads the party in power.
Who gives a rat's posterior to what people like you think. You could call anyone and anything trash, but that's just your opinion - and you are just one insignificant one in 1 billion.
RE:STUPID ARUN GANDHI
by Marco Polo on Oct 09, 2007 04:20 AM Permalink
the bootlickers' party,no other party.she is safe among them.Rat is not just an animal,it is Ganesha's vehicle.We give importance to rat too.
RE:RE:STUPID ARUN GANDHI
by Loan Shark on Oct 09, 2007 04:22 AM Permalink
Maybe you haven't heard that phrase before ... sorry, that was just a figure of speech ... I meant no disrespect to Lord Ganesh - the vighna vinashak
