10 consecutive slaps on BJP's face (UP, VP, Presidential, Goa elections, 123 agreement, Sethusamudram, DMK dissmiss, Karnataka marriage, mid-term poll and Nandigram. A good party for nothing.
RE:10 consecutive slaps on BJP's face (UP, VP, Presidential, Goa elections, 123 agreement, Sethusamudram, DMK dissmiss, Karnataka marriage, mid-term poll and Nandigram. A good party for nothing.
by Mukkesh Gandhi on Nov 16, 2007 08:39 PM Permalink
if are you are - anti congress anti bjp, then what are you, LEFT with....
1. Rama was ever-suspecting of his wife%u2019s chastity no matter what she did to prove it to him. After winning his battle against Ravan he forced Sita to undergo an Agni pariksha (Walking through the fire to prove her chastity) -- which Sita complied with and passed. Then, as Ramayana itself tells, Rama banished his wife Sita when she was pregnant to convince "a few critics" in his kingdom, who thought that Sita was unchaste due to her long captivity in Ravana%u2019s city. To Rama the appeasement of a "few critics" was more important than his duty as a (so called loving) husband and as a to-be-father. It was only out of suspicion on Sita%u2019s chastity that this so called "loving" husband with "high moral values" abandoned Sita.
2. On the other hand, Ravana, a non-Aryan, who is regarded as a demon in the Ramayana, was a man who never violated Sita even when she was in his captivity. When he kidnapped Sita, he did not take her to his palace but instead arranged a separate place for her with women attendants. Nevertheless, Ram killed him. This act also highlights that Ram was no where close to being a man of "high moral values". (Continued)
RE:The truth about Maryada Purushottama - the Perfect Man. 1
by Nandakumar M on Nov 16, 2007 11:20 AM Permalink
You are an idiot and a moron who doesn't know the moral responsibilities of one's role. 1. A leader should sacrifice his self happiness for the happiness of the people. Rama requested Sita to do agnipariksha and go vanvaas to prevent all citizens from believing those critics. Obviously, you lick current day politician's back who sacrifice people for self benefit, so you don't understand this. 2. Let me kidnap your wife or mother and keep her in my garage without touching her and see what you do. May be you will come and congratulate me I guess. Btw, Ravana kept her aloof untouched cos he will die if he touches her. Thats why he kidnaps her along with the piece of ground she was standing, without touching her. Sita herself can kill Ravana, but she left it to her husband as that is the dharma of a king's wife. You donkey holes will not know these obviously.
RE:The truth about Maryada Purushottama - the Perfect Man. 1
by Mukkesh Gandhi on Nov 16, 2007 08:41 PM Permalink
Thank you for presenting all this facts,... you have studied the Ramayana very well.. now please study about your religion too... and present similar NEGATIVE facts... for us all to study..
Thanks and best of luck... for that bold step to study your religion... and bringing out the wrongs in them....
i will be waiting for your postings about the same.
3. Rama killed Vali, who had been known as a good and pious vanara-king, treacherously and deceitfully by interfering in a one-on-one fight between Vali and his younger brother Sugriva. (Sugriva had challenged Vali to the fight) After Rama killed Vali, Sugriva (Vali%u2019s younger brother) claimed Vali's widow Tara and the monkey kingdom. For his help to Sugriva, Rama demanded help from Sugriva (and his general Hanuman) in his quest against Ravan. Is this the work of a truly pious, moral man? Does a pious man treasonably kill someone to garner support for personal reasons from a "Monkey" who actually claims his elder brother%u2019s widow as his own? And to think of it, this person is worshipped by close to a billion people today. Shameful, to say the least!
4. Upon the return of "Lord" Rama to Ayodhya and being crowned the king of Ayodhya, the death of a child occurs in the kingdom. He is told that calamities such as this occur when Dharma (underlying order) is not followed in a kingdom. So, Rama personally beheads (executes) Shambuka %u2013 a person of the Shudra (untouchable) caste, because Shambuka was "repenting his sins" which apparently untouchables were not allowed to under the Varna system. Is this a man of "high moral values"? For a reincarnate of "Lord of all the worlds" (Lord Vishnu) he was not just preposterously ignorant, he was also down-right caste-prejudiced. (Continued)
RE:The truth about Maryada Purushottama - the Perfect Man. 2
by Mukkesh Gandhi on Nov 16, 2007 08:42 PM Permalink
Thank you for presenting all this facts,... you have studied the Ramayana very well.. now please study about your religion too... and present similar NEGATIVE facts... for us all to study..
Thanks and best of luck... for that bold step to study your religion... and bringing out the wrongs in them....
i will be waiting for your postings about the same.
5. He killed Sudroka, a non-Aryan of a lower caste, for daring to recite the Vedas, and he killed him out of a sense of Aryan supremacy. He believed that only Aryans and not non-Aryans should perform worship. Of course, this dogmatic view cannot find any logical support. This is another instance underlining the caste-prejudice and violent nature of "Lord Rama - the avatar of Shiva%u201D. Is this despicable man worthy of even a mention in our history books, let alone be worshipped by millions and millions each day? Wake up, India. Please!
6. Manu Smiriti, which is regarded as foundation of Hindu cultural life, advocates child marriage and denying women freedom to marry after their husband has died. It also preaches "wife burning", a horrid practice where wife is burnt alive in her husband's funeral pyre. People regard daughters as unwanted burden, which acts as a fuel to growing problem of female infanticide, women still have very little decision making capacity and they are expected to conform to the draconian standards set by the elders.
RE:The truth about Maryada Purushottama - the Perfect Man. 3
by Mukkesh Gandhi on Nov 16, 2007 08:42 PM Permalink
Thank you for presenting all this facts,... you have studied the Ramayana very well.. now please study about your religion too... and present similar NEGATIVE facts... for us all to study..
Thanks and best of luck... for that bold step to study your religion... and bringing out the wrongs in them....
i will be waiting for your postings about the same.
