It is not a surprise that the ruling elite of both Pakistan and India have no great regard for the judiciary. India's elite uses seminars to run down the judiciary. Pakistan's elite uses more direct methods.
RE:About the judiciary
by Sun on Nov 04, 2007 07:54 AM Permalink
After all we are brothers arent we. What else can you expect.You got a valid point buddy.
RE:About the judiciary
by santosh kumar choudhury on Nov 04, 2007 06:22 AM Permalink
I completely agree with yuu and feel ashamed to look at Indian political punters. Supreme Court last week said Politicians are not "National Asset"
RE:About the judiciary
by veerapan on Nov 04, 2007 06:56 AM Permalink
Thank you very much Musaraf...Kill 15 crore terrorists in Pakistan...If you want my help then I will also help you..........Thanks a lot..Pakistan me kab Bomb Diwali hoga?????? I am waiting .......
When india is reeling under direct and indirect terrorism from insurgents from pakistan i don't feel any need to india to support musharaff or musha 'rough'
RE:affairs in pakistan
by veerapan on Nov 04, 2007 06:56 AM Permalink
Thank you very much Musaraf...Kill 15 crore terrorists in Pakistan...If you want my help then I will also help you..........Thanks a lot..Pakistan me kab Bomb Diwali hoga?????? I am waiting .......
Not sure why this guy Hamid Mir keeps saying that India supports Musharraf. He is responsible for Kargil, Indians of this generation will never forget or forgive. If Pakistanis has put up Musharraf as their leader, Indians will deal with him as they would with anyone in power. Please keep India out of your mess. You truly did not gain Independence, your own army is your enemy, you deal with your mess instead of blaming everyone in the world. Good Luck.
RE:India a supporter of Musharraf?
by deepak on Nov 04, 2007 10:02 AM Permalink
I think Hamid Mir is disappointed at the responses coming out of India... But then, i presume Hamid Mir realizes that India doesn't want to be targetted party for Mushraff to evoke emotion at this current stage..
RE:India a supporter of Musharraf?
by l m on Nov 04, 2007 05:44 AM Permalink
i think musharaff is right in removing chief justice as that guy was releasing terrorists and prosecuting police so that police loose interets in stopping terrorists. something similar done by sonia by removing POTA/TADA etc
if Bharadkumar limited his rhetoric in previous articlea, and not always looked at other nations through anti-American ideology, Perhaps, we, the indians, who want to maintain some sort of balance between our economic prosperity which comes of indulging in trade with all nations including America, and not be carried away in anti-American rhetoric, and start sleeping with people in Beds who will never satisfy our personal economical interests, perhaps, he had some merit in his words about following America's plan in the region... But Bharadkumar is an anti-American ideologue, with limited interest to geopolitics, and nothing else.. There are things beside geopolitics... Plus, we do not wanna express strong words against Pakistan, and end up giving Mushraff a chance to evoke emotions using outside nation like india... Just think how far Pakistan has fallen into with this declaration.. Its already oppressed institutions, and among them until today, an independent judicary system, has been branded non-existent without india firing a single bullet... Muslims, if left alone, always fight each other... Fire is in Pakistan, India's neighbor, but India has state of the art safety standard installed to extinguish the fire... Look Kashmiri people look across the border, and say; is this pakistan?
RE:If Bharadkumar
by Loan Shark on Nov 04, 2007 05:02 AM Permalink
good point. but muslims in kashmir - the fighters that is, want their own country. Time and again, they have rejected the idea of being a pakistani province. Even those guys know the truth about Pakistan - that they will never prosper with Pakistan and will be subject to the same style rule.
I sometimes wonder why kashmiries (muslims that is) want a separate state? what do those separatist leaders think will help them survive? what will they do with land?
Only in Kashmir, the Muslims complain about Army presence but what about mostly 55 Islamic nations ruled by Armies, monopolies, dictators etc.? How come Muslims do not complain about that?
RE:Muslims and Democracy
by deepak on Nov 04, 2007 03:50 AM Permalink
It is a Muslims best kept secret, after all, if they work against their brothers (fellow musafir), they will be branded Munafir (Not pure muslim) (SP)
Mushy's making a last stand to keep himself from being sidelined, as the November deadline for his tenure approaches. He may be able to get USA to accept it, but will the jihadis take this lying down? Or will they now take the fight more directly to Musharraf?
Position: Ruler of Pakistan Title : Dictator (or Pick your own )
Requirements: Must maintain positive control of pak military at all times. Must Keep islamists , talabini type people at bay. Shut down madrassas , replace with western useful educational instutions. Cut off funding from Saudis to mosques Must safe guard nukes and related assets Not support and or export Islamic terrorism Not start or support conflicts in or with other countries. Provide air , land and sea access to western assets. Must file monthly status reports to Washington
New Requirement: Purge islamist from pak military
Benefits: Ruler maximus , free reign to rule only when not undermining above stated requirements. Funds in foreign bank accounts in currency of choice .
Salary: Billions of $ as and when deemed appropriate by Washington. Payble in Aid , cash or Arms.
Failure to meet the above requirements may constitute grounds for termination* , and or Arial bombardment followed by optional invasion.
RE:New Job Opening
by Loan Shark on Nov 04, 2007 05:04 AM Permalink
that US will have full access to your posterior ... and it will not be considered harrasment but part of job description
Now, Pak is under direct control of US - highly unstable and can disturbe India (and its exceptional growth) at any time using a Pak army.
Question of US to Karat: Do you want our Nukes with our 'strategic support'? Or else be surounded by 2 BIG enemies - Militray ruled Pak and China.
China can never be India's 'true' friend in the near future (may b in the long run we may become). Pak under US (or their plans). Do we need US on board or sail alone?
BIG QUESTION?
I think, get the nuke project on board (that gives us not only power, but nukes). Have 'strategic relationship' with US, but with respectable distance.
It's going to be a dirty game. US has started it (it's their last resort, as US is getting weaker day by day). We have to tread cautiously. If we are successful, we will benefit 10 times or else be doomed.
HELP us divide pakistan into four parts Sindh, Balochistan, Wazirstan and PakPunj.
Let's break the back of this terrorist country once and for all.
Time has come to take our revenge. After 600 years of islamic invasion and 150 years of british rule, HERE IS OUR CHANCE TO CLAIM OUR LAND BACK. OUR VERY OWN SINDHU VALLEY must be taken back. The place where ancient hindu traditions prospered..
RE:divide pakistan
by Nemediyah on Nov 04, 2007 03:39 AM Permalink
Muslims, if left alone, will kill themselves. Therefore they always have to look for expansion. That is their history.
RE:divide pakistan
by Haiku Master on Nov 04, 2007 05:56 AM Permalink
Before the Indian peninsular broke off; it was part of the African land mass! Dont you think we should work to merge again! After all modern man originated from there! Get married... you will hear your spouse calling you an idiot daily ... many times over!
RE:divide pakistan
by Don johnson on Nov 04, 2007 07:51 AM Permalink
Be my guest buddy, dont forget india has 15 different insurgencies within india. Dont you billion FAGS have something better to worry about then reading news on pak, you chump seems to be really fascinated anything to do with pak please leave pak alone and let it handle its problem its more then capable of it and please keep begging america for calll centers and try to make toilets for 500 million poor bhindians so you can start as a jamadar.
