If u believe in freedom then why u r capturing all the powers. In this election year, ur speech is not more than a cacophony full of promises. If u really believe in freedom, then resign from all head postion and conduct a free and fair election.
U should understand that there is no freedom greater than democracy, why u will not be blamed for obstructing it.
Do u have control or can u put a hold on religious fanatics, whom u definitely fostered and now considering as ur potential killers. Pak falling away in that front. As long as they form another power center in pak, all the development u promised will never be sustainable.
Not sure if Pak is a begger or not but it is clear that u r now begging to be in power.
IT IS THE TIME AND NEED THAT PAKISTAN SHOULD BE UNTIE DWITH INDIA AND SHOULD BE COSIDERED AS AKHAND BHARAT IN ORDER TO AHVE PROGRESS GROWTH OF BOTH COUTNRIES. PAKISTAN LACKS BEHIND COMAPRED TO INDIAN PROGRESS. LET US EXPLORE THE POSSIBILITIES OF UNIFICATION OF PAKISTAN WITH INDIA SO THAT WE CAN HAVE ONE TIME MUSLIM PRIME MINISTER HINDY PRESIDENT AND VICE VERSA.
RE:Unitewith India Mr. Musharaff
by A P on Mar 26, 2007 06:05 PM Permalink
Why should we care if Pakistan lacks anything? Why should we invite trouble once after getting rid of these idiotic people in 1947? Don't we have enough problems of our own?
And your idea of rotating hindu/muslim pm/president is undemocratic. in a democracy only the person chosen by people should be elected . not a person of a particular religion.
RE:Unitewith India Mr. Musharaff
by abdul jeelani on Mar 26, 2007 05:05 PM Permalink
India is a great nation where minorities enjoy more freedom and held so much big position. But lot more to improve interms of employment and education,better standard of livings on urban areas.First of all, all currupt politicians to be corrected.
RE:Unitewith India Mr. Musharaff
by Larsen Keats on Mar 26, 2007 05:33 PM Permalink
Why did Pakistan separate in the first place? Sorry, but India does not want Pakistan to be united with itself. The surgery has been done and unification is not possible nor desirable.
BTW, will this unification you propose be under the Indian constitution? If so, there is no provision of choosing leaders based on religion, and I am very happy that it is so.
RE:Unitewith India Mr. Musharaff
by Nitender Mishra on Mar 26, 2007 04:58 PM Permalink
Hakeem Sahab, yehi khayal hona chahiye har insaan ka, chahe woh sarhad ke is paar ho ya us paar, hamari taakat ko kamzor karti hai hamari ladaiyan, ladna chod kar criket khelen aur taraqi karen .
IT IS THE TIME AND NEED THAT PAKISTAN SHOULD BE UNTIE DWITH INDIA AND SHOULD BE COSIDERED AS AKHAND BHARAT IN ORDER TO AHVE PROGRESS GROWTH OF BOTH COUTNRIES. PAKISTAN LACKS BEHIND COMAPRED TO INDIAN PROGRESS. LET US EXPLORE THE POSSIBILITIES OF UNIFICATION OF PAKISTAN WITH INDIA SO THAT WE CAN HAVE ONE TIME MUSLIM PRIME MINISTER HINDY PRESIDENT AND VICE VERSA.
RE:Unitewith India Mr. Musharaff
by A P on Mar 26, 2007 06:10 PM Permalink
One big difference between India & Pakistan is that we can have PM/President belonging to any religion while Pakistan can not have a non muslim PM /President.
It would be a good idea to stay away from such bigots who discriminate between their own citizens on basis of religion
No doubt that even Pakistan is Progressing. He has definitely taken steps in developing and strengthening the Rural economy, small scale industries (though not major ones) when compared to the erstwhile rulers. But the question is whether this is sustainable considering huge political problems all around them, Huge defense budget, centralised planning, lesser autonomy to provincial economies, funding terrorism which backfires in the form political instability and gun culture.
If he is really serious about development, he needs to take terrorism out of his/their agenda for ever and separate military and governance. But I doubt.
By the way 'genuine' economic relations with India will also help Pakistan in the long run especially the country's agricultural sector.
I hope the present president is best in whole life of pakistha. He knew pakisthan was a begger but not now due to his bargain with US.. But whatever he has done it is best for pak and the whole pakisthanis should support him and restore him another 10 years in power. Pakithan be can be next US dear pakisthanis... belive me.. regards
RE:pakisthan president
by raj singh on Mar 26, 2007 05:17 PM Permalink
begger will remain beggar whole life whatever amount the he received by begging.so how pak can be next US,unless US become beggar itself.
It is difficult to believe all that the president says when it comes to non-interfarence in politics. But yes, Pakistan has had tremendous boost to internationl investment and infrastructure building under the present government.
I hope there is more investment in educaton in Pakistan and successful NRPs come back to invest in the services sector and replicate the success that India has. It is very possible if the country focuses on education.
surprised.....are you delivering what you said Mr. Mush....f. Wonderful that in every area you have allocated budget. But from where this money is coming from. And what about the budget allocation to terrorist activities.... I think that you have concealed. Comeon Mush...f, donnt befool yourself and more to your country man. Come out this hell type thinking.
