Good progress in defense and relation with US. Now this is time for Indian claim on Tibet. We have very much forgotten that Tibet is integral part of India. Our old politician makes this mistake. Even our most of citizens are also not aware about it. Shame on us.
Good progress in defense and relation with US. Now this is time for Indian claim on Tibet. We have very much forgotten that Tibet is integral part of India. Our old politician makes this mistake. Even our most of citizens are also not aware about it. Shame on us. India Tibet = United India Remember bigger nation is always stronger nation.
RE:Tibet
by indiman on Jun 23, 2007 07:29 AM Permalink
boss when was Tibet part of India. Even the british never went beyond the MC Mahon line the present day Indo China boundary except Aksai Chin. Tibet was always independent and should be independent. The Chinese should be leaving Tibet alone. But if the Tibetans have no courage to fight then its their fault and Dalai Lamas fault. To me people like that should be enslaved. Peace doesent win anything. Gandhi wouldnt have been as effective if not for the extremists in the congress like lala lajpat rai, subhash chandra bose, bal gangadhar tilak, bipin chandra pal etc.. The british promoted Gandhi because they thought that way the extremists could be controlled and the moderate voice would be stronger. But then this turned Gandhi into a huge force. So in the end if not for the extrimsts the british would have packed off Gandhi long ago. Peace has to go hand in hand with violence/ tough stands. Indian freedom movement is a perfect example of this, but not many people realise that.
RE:Tibet
by bingo on Jun 23, 2007 07:41 AM Permalink
See the culture and history of Tibet. It is as good as India. Kailash Mansarowar a holy place for Hindu is in Tibet. Actually Tibet itself a part of India. If british makes this mistake then we have to correct it.
Why are all the Indian Navy ships, army bases, navy bases given hindi names. Why not a single name in a south indian language. We pay the biggest chunk of taxes for these ships anyways, So whats the big deal about naming a ship in one of the four south indian languages, or Assamese or some Nort East Indian language.
RE:Ship Names
by Pawan sharda on Jun 23, 2007 06:55 AM Permalink
coz south indian names will be difficult for Admiral and other cadres to pronounce and understand... By the time they call the ship name in South indian language during war.. enemy would have already attacked us...
RE:Ship Names
by thik thak on Jun 23, 2007 08:23 AM Permalink
This is not hindi this is sanskrit.This is related to 'jal'(water). In hindi generally they use 'pani' for water.
RE:Ship Names
by Rediff Editors Daddy on Jun 23, 2007 08:47 AM Permalink
yes its Sanskrit.. and its a combination of two words "Jal" mean water & "Ashwa" mean horse.. the name suggests dat its a Horse in water... a sea horse to be specific... and its a symbol of speed in the water. and from where this nonsense came in... "there isnt a single southindian name" thats bullshit.... guys people like u made it difficult to get our nation all together to be a Superpower... although we are going for it... and we will be a superpower soon...
RE:Ship Names
by bingo on Jun 23, 2007 07:26 AM Permalink
Indiman just stop this nonsense. If they decide the names in Hindi then let it be. Even, I am Marathi, I am not want to force for names in Marathi language.
