Most of the people who are against Haneef is against him because he is a muslim. Take the case of Shankaracharya. The court has just framed charges against him. So.. can we say that all the hindus are criminals.. We can't do that. It is better to have straightforward approach to the issue. The people who charged Haneef are saying that there is no charge against him now. Still people sitting in rediff discussion board and trying to portray him as terrorist. Will that be useful? Do not carry on with the hate campaign.. Be it Hindu or Muslim.. If he is a criminal, just call him as a criminal. But do not brand his neighbour also as a criminal. Dialogue is the best form to solve the long standing issues. Go for it.
RE:Reject both form of fundamentalism
by Major Sassy on Jul 28, 2007 01:58 PM Permalink
On what basis can you make the allegation that people are against Haneef because of his religion.
RE:RE:Reject both form of fundamentalism
by fahimuddin khan on Jul 28, 2007 02:24 PM Permalink
you go thru all your messages which you have posted and if you are intelligent enough you will realize that you are 100% biased agianst muslims.
RE:RE:Reject both form of fundamentalism
by ganesh subi on Jul 28, 2007 02:05 PM Permalink
See the name of the other gentleman. Is it not provoking????
RE:Reject both form of fundamentalism
by Kemal on Jul 28, 2007 02:07 PM Permalink
what name?? u mean Mohdthefucker?? It should have been childbonker maybe?!
RE:Reject both form of fundamentalism
by ganesh subi on Jul 28, 2007 02:10 PM Permalink
Try to set the standards in the discussion board. Do not derail the entire process. We are here to discuss the things.
RE:Reject both form of fundamentalism
by Indra on Jul 28, 2007 02:22 PM Permalink
true Mr. Ganesh, but we have some narrow minded people with us, Who always try to break our communal harmony by saying harsh words because of a single person. It is our countrymen's weekness.
RE:Reject both form of fundamentalism
by shilpa sudripta rao on Jul 28, 2007 03:30 PM Permalink
For communal harmony...the way moulvis encourage muslim boy to marry hindu girls..hindu priest too should encourage hindu boys to marry muslim girls.... then we can talk about communal harmony !!!
RE:Reject both form of fundamentalism
by fahimuddin khan on Jul 28, 2007 01:54 PM Permalink
Tru Mr. Ganesh. if somebody is involved he should be punished on a case to case basis.Its very dangerous to genralize any comunity or caste.
RE:Reject both form of fundamentalism
by ganesh subi on Jul 28, 2007 02:04 PM Permalink
What we said is true. Just see the name you have kept to hide you. This is to provoke the muslim brethren. Haneef is an Indian.
can we torture an australian or American for 25 days and say they are innocent later? can we cancel their visas in the middle of interrogation to prolong their detention? Indian external affairs ministry is such a meek, toothless, spineless puppet.
Afghans, Iraques have done this in the past and continue to do and you should feel happy that Australians did not bump him like the Talibans or other outfit of Muslims do it. What happened to innocent foreign tourist who had been killed by Terrorist in Kashmir recently for which, the government is silent. When the Kashmir valley is infested with terrorism, it should not be called a tourist spot and no tourist should be allowed to venture. Lust for money, government will go to any extent to keep addressing Kashmir as Tourist centre.
RE:External affairs
by trikarn on Jul 28, 2007 02:37 PM Permalink
even russia china etc routinely make the suspect vanish. be happy the aussies have a judiciary, which works.
RE:Folks who cant read
by ADAM on Jul 28, 2007 01:55 PM Permalink
Nobody should support haneef if he is a terrorist or just supporting terrorist. He must be hanged if he has supported his cousin. But the problem here why mr. major is so upset. Look at his face guys he is so upset. pls somebody help him no to get angry
RE:Folks who cant read
by Major Sassy on Jul 28, 2007 01:59 PM Permalink
I am uspet because there is clear prima facie evidence of his guilt yet people protect him because of religion. For some people their religion comes before humanity
RE:Folks who cant read
by fahimuddin khan on Jul 28, 2007 01:56 PM Permalink
I will support him as he was falsely being framed by Australian authority as a Muslim terrorist.So his release means the tag is gone in vapour now except for people like you who is having akal in their ghutna.
RE:RE:Folks who cant read
by fahimuddin khan on Jul 28, 2007 01:58 PM Permalink
If you are educated enough than go and read the statement of DPP in any Australian news site which clearly states that all charges has been DROPPED. YOU MUST BE ACTING LIKE ANDHA
RE:RE:RE:Folks who cant read
by Major Sassy on Jul 28, 2007 02:00 PM Permalink
You are the one who is andha? Did you read the next line? Where DPP said because of a techincal issue?
Charges are dropped on techincal ground only my friend.
RE:Folks who cant read
by Arvind Singh on Jul 28, 2007 02:23 PM Permalink
Stop supporting all your friends, they might be declared terrorist Major Sassy, donot even support any Indian, any one may be involved...irrespective of religion, in Inida money matters more to commit any crime then any thing else, my dear.
RE:Folks who cant read
by fahimuddin khan on Jul 28, 2007 03:58 PM Permalink
the technical issue was that they said in a court room that the sim was found at glasgow airport which was proven wrong when it was cleared by Scotland Yard ( SASSAY is intelligent them) that the sim was with Sabeel at Liverpool. This technical mistake was enough to prove him innocent which is true as per Australian court. If you are so honest and intelligent than why dont you refer to the Judge who said that even I will be failed in character test if these are the criteria. Man le SASSY ki tu biased hai News ko andhon ki tarah padta hai and you enjoy Islam and Muslim bashing.
RE:RE:RE:Folks who cant read
by Islam Truth on Jul 28, 2007 02:21 PM Permalink
Any muslim support jihads are true bas....d. Islam is religion of peace . Dont bring shame to it . God is almighty. We need not protect him by waging battle against other human
No one can get clean chit easily as australian laws are so strict. Hanif must be innocent and this is why he is out today. dont try to teach us australian gov willn't have sufficient evidence to keep him behind the bars..ballah ballah ballah. Why dont u people accept reality and commenting like you are working with FBI.
RE:Australian laws are strict
by Kemal on Jul 28, 2007 01:46 PM Permalink
Aadam miyan....Aussies could not prove his connivance due to lack of evidence or maybe because they are too soft or professional! This guy should have been interrogated not even by FBI but by the CIA secret services offshored in Egypt/Pakistan/Middle-east, then maybe "truth" would have been emerged.
RE:Australian laws are strict
by fahimuddin khan on Jul 28, 2007 02:00 PM Permalink
yeah true thats why not even a single Guantanamo Bay prisoner has been charged even after 5 years. They take so long to get the truth out.
RE:Australian laws are strict
by Kemal on Jul 28, 2007 02:13 PM Permalink
Read properly fahim miyan,,,did I mention Guantanamo Bay? No use to put there coz its still under US law there...western laws are no good against terrorists.
RE:Australian laws are strict
by Major Sassy on Jul 28, 2007 01:43 PM Permalink
Really Australian laws are strict are they? How do you know are you a lawyer there?
Nope Aussie has very lax rules; anyway he did not get a clean chit. He is under investigation.
RE:Australian laws are strict
by Major Sassy on Jul 28, 2007 02:01 PM Permalink
Because a terrorist is getting support only on the basis of his religion.
RE:RE:Australian laws are strict
by R Balasubramanian on Jul 28, 2007 02:06 PM Permalink
Major, you should know laws are enacted only to be strictly enforced on the offenders and not selectively depending on his status and religion. Atleast you should appreciate the investigating team for their apology. Will our security and investigating team do it? Never. When my relatives who also work abroad come to India on annual leave, they come down with bothways air ticket and not single way and book the ticket in India for their return. Booking of single way ticket itself has to be probed since Haneef is employed and he has not relinquished his services.
some of my hindu brethren are very upset after the release of haneef,,,, I don't know if he was guilty or not but as per some upset hindu brothers he should be hanged or he should be killed immediately... I know also why they are upset...
RE:some of hindu brethren
by vikas sethi on Jul 28, 2007 01:43 PM Permalink
Do not give a communal twist to the issue. Indulging in oneupmanship,which will lead to nowhere.
RE:RE:some of hindu brethren
by vikas sethi on Jul 28, 2007 01:45 PM Permalink
Do not give a communal twist to the issue. Indulging in oneupmanship,which will lead to nowhere. The topic is terrorism.
