RE:WHY MEDIA NEVER SUPPORT HINDUS?
by R A on Jul 27, 2007 08:19 PM Permalink
Tera dimaag kharaab hai. You don't understand what Divya wants to tell all.
RE:WHY MEDIA NEVER SUPPORT HINDUS?
by krishnan js on Jul 27, 2007 08:17 PM Permalink
Let us know the purpose of the message please!I still believe "The Hindu" is a Iyengar icon.
RE:WHY MEDIA NEVER SUPPORT HINDUS?
by shilpa rao on Jul 27, 2007 08:19 PM Permalink
Divya....it is a era of globalization....if you have money...buy 80% share of marcedez benz...
RE:WHY MEDIA NEVER SUPPORT HINDUS?
by shilpa rao on Jul 27, 2007 08:30 PM Permalink
Dear by on...first you understand globalization. (1) Today our standard of life is better because of globalization...jobs opportunity increased in India...viz:call centre/bank, etc.
(2) Globolization is irrespective of caste or religion.
Control of business from the point of religion vis a vis development nation altogether not possible... some time to criticize is o.k but not always.........
RE:WHY MEDIA NEVER SUPPORT HINDUS?
by STE on Jul 27, 2007 08:18 PM Permalink
Excellent information. This looks like a valid information, as the media has openly expressed its pseudo-secularism for years together. During the recent Bombay tragedy of collapsed building, there has been immediate aid from RSS.
this was never portrait in the papers, but anything incorrect about RSS will be done atonce. Similar is news about conversion in Hydrabad.
RE:WHY MEDIA NEVER SUPPORT HINDUS?
by Pay Chop on Jul 27, 2007 08:14 PM Permalink
I've been reading loads of irrelevant posts from the scholarly Divya. Pls don't just copy paste irrelevant junk here Divya. if you have anything original to say, pls do. Do not behave like a fanatic. Fanatics like u, whether Hindu or Moslem, are the bane of our country.
RE:RE:WHY MEDIA NEVER SUPPORT HINDUS?
by STE on Jul 27, 2007 08:20 PM Permalink
Pay, either you can chose to close your eyes on the facts, by being pseudo-secularist or try to get the truth out. No matter if the truth is against the Hindus or muslims or christians.
Which one do you prefer? I guess the truth. Then you approach should be to validate the claims of Divya and not to outrightly oppose it.
RE:THIS IS FACT
by STE on Jul 27, 2007 08:29 PM Permalink
Divya,
Idol worship, gives image to the person (GOD) that we need to speak our hearts out. As stated by sankaracharya, even Vedas must be left down, when you want to go to higher level of realization.
At this stage, we need something to hold one, something to give image to. Idol worship is just a path, where you can put a face to the person that you speak to.
Muslims use cresent moon Christians use Jesus, cross etc.
So Idol worship is correct and it helps in upliftment. (here I am discussing about genuine worship, people have taken to few steps ahead of declaring normal stones as God, which I definitely oppose).
RE:THIS IS FACT
by Pay Chop on Jul 27, 2007 08:36 PM Permalink
stop barking here. This is not a propaganda site for Hinduism or any other religion. Anyway Divya, no intelligent person will care two hoots about what you think. Jaa, jaa ke soja. Baht Raat ho chuki.
RE:RE:THIS IS FACT
by Pay Chop on Jul 27, 2007 08:40 PM Permalink
Abey chootiye, I am an Indian first, Hindu next, Brahmin after that. Samajh aaya tere bhoosa bhare dimaag mein?
Bhasmasur ko palo ab maja aa raha hai na jaisi karni vaisi bharni SRIMAD BHAGWAT GITA MEI THEEK HI LIKHA HAI JAISA KARM KAROGE VAISA HI FAL MELEGA.... SAMJHE JEHADI JANNAT JA RAHE HO NA.AUR JANNAT JANE KA BOMB BLAST KARO.DER HAI ANDHER NAHI HAI.
RE:be careful this may be to side track us
by ROFL on Jul 27, 2007 07:54 PM Permalink
yup u r right..but the last point bothers me....exactly who r u refering to ??
RE:THIS IS FACT
by krishnan js on Jul 27, 2007 07:59 PM Permalink
"there is no castism,idol worship,and all other bad practices of hindus".Please correct yourself.THERE IS NOTHING BAD ABOUT ANYTHING.THEY ARE ALL SCIENTIFIC.Even Gita mentions Caste is based on one's nature.Let us know the truth atleast .A son of a brahmin need not be a brahmin and similiarly son of a sudra need not be a sudra and everything is open to him.Ofcourse corrupt selfishness brought about such a turnaround and bad repute to the caste system.IN MODERN LANGUAGE IT MEANS HORSES FOR COURSES irrespective of birth. Even amongst 12 Alwars who had a vision of Vishnu and are worshipped in South 7 were Sudras by birth.God sees everyone alike.
RE:RE:THIS IS FACT
by STE on Jul 27, 2007 08:34 PM Permalink
Krishnan, I agree your point, but in this stupid era, choice of words are definitely important. God has suggested that there 4 types of people based on one's "sudharma". This was misintrepreted by our people as caste. Ofcourse history is written by victorious. Please read the 5 books written by Dharmpal, he has explained the social conditions before the british's invasion.
You can clearly see that there was no difference in the society based on caste (1720), Britishers were successful in first diving the Hindus and then hindus-muslims.
RE:This is all we needed!
by prasanth peddaayyavarla on Jul 27, 2007 08:06 PM Permalink
So what is ur part...if you dont want your religion to be further ruined, people like you should educate others around you (who support extremism). Tell them what they are missing. Show them how they are not enjoying the highest freedom they are given in india (EG: show me one country where muslims are minorities(like india) which has a muslim president). these extremists like SIMI have always misused the peaceful nature of indian culture.
