RE:yet again MUSLIM terrorists...
by Kayamuddin Qureshi on Jul 07, 2007 12:39 PM Permalink
Dear Mr. Mukesh dayal, The statement you made about a person,I am sure that he (Mohammed(PUBH)) never theaches to kill innocent people, childerns amd women. There are few mad people who are utilised the religion for their vested interest; real muslim who follows the path shown by prophet Muhammed(PUBH), can not to do the wrong doing. if a person having five son and one of them became the miscreant; it does means that his/her parents are squarrely blamed!!!!for his deed. We must go into the root causes, why that person has follow the path!!!! Not to try to blame his/ her parent.I am not supporting those mad guys. There are democratic ways to register your protest, not by killing or intimedating to innocent people. My dear Islam itself means peace. Jehad means Struggle; there are different form of struggle.If you are struggling to earn your livelyhood that also considered a kind of Jehad, the struggle against the atrocities/unjustice also a kind of Jehad.I agreed; there are some misguided persons who are misgiuding to imature minds for their vested interest.We all should stop to blame any religion or person on behalf of a few enemy of their society or their religion and ensure that those terrorist should not succeed in their aims to destablised the peace and harmony of this beautiful world.I will give my humble advise to you before blaming anybody, you should first study or know about them thereafter you comment!!!!! I am closing my reply on this words " Majhab nahi shikhata
RE:yet again MUSLIM terrorists...
by maqsood ali on Jul 07, 2007 11:28 AM Permalink
Hi Mukesh, plaese refrain from posting such provocative hateful mails, this way you are only fuelling the fire, islam does not authorise under any circumstance to kill and rape, request to change you distorted views of islam.
Gujurat riots happened. Horrible? absolutely. Acceptable? no
People from both sides died starting with the train.
Several incidents of killings by muslim extremists happened prior to that building a sense of insecurity in all other religions.
A benchmark starting point being the massacre of hindus in kashmir. We are a plural nation that seemed for a while to forgive each other.
But the rise of this global jihad has led to stronger views for co-religionists including the christians, jews, hindus and even buddhists who are suffering from an insurgency of a minority muslim in thailand and china. More and more people are identifying with their religion now.
It is unbeleivable that any realestate problem or any major in the world today is headlined by muslims. What a sad state for a religion practised by about 1 billion people.
But inspite of so much evidence available to the good doctor, for this article to include gujarat riots as a source could not have even been generated by the pradesh congress comittee. The "smartness" and "brilliance" points to a far-sighted sickular leadership in delhi.
This sickulars have governed the nation for 50 years and have successfully created the kashmir,punjab,assam, ne, tamil issues apart from singularly promoting a sense of insecurity among muslims that there is nation of 850 million hindus out to get them.
In a way pakistan was right. they knew better that muslims would not co-habitate with anyone.
The root of Terrorism is just bcos of Inferiority feeling. US attacked Iraq for Oil not religion. US supports Israel for monetary benefits not supports religion. The terrorist falsely interept and they fear their religion is attacked.if they have full faith on their religion they would have known it cant be and ever be desroyed ,but they have a complex. For example suicide bombers cant attack a military post and die like a martyr.They dont have the confidence they have inferiority comlex about their fighting capabilities.They are experts in killing unarmed civillians Once these people comes out of these complexes it will bw start to a n end of terrorism.
RE:Brain washed
by srinivas on Jul 07, 2007 11:03 AM Permalink
Ya good point Kunal ............ that proves that either the alligation that he was brainwashed is wrong or the story is cooked up ..................
Our PM asks us to not to diferrentiate between muslims and nonmuslims,but MR PM can you answer that wherever a terroist activity is done in any corner of the world why a Muslim is associated with it each and everytime . Also MR PM don't try to teach us ,you nonsense politicians have created differnce between Indians by your votebank politics ,caste quota and all those nasty things .Have you forgotten that one of your CM has introduced job quota for Muslims in Andhra Pradesh , so first teach your party people first then try to teach us .
RE:muslims
by KC on Jul 07, 2007 11:00 AM Permalink
boss his message was for Outside world not to treat/brand all Indians as terrorists. Which as PM was his duty.
If you want to catch some part of his appeal and distort the things to suit your thinking. Go ahead ....people here are more sensible to know the truth
RE:muslims
by Bhaskar Srinivasan on Jul 07, 2007 11:02 AM Permalink
so are we to have two different rules? one for the outside and nother for the inside?
RE:RE:muslims
by Sandeep Chavan on Jul 07, 2007 11:14 AM Permalink
Mr. Robinhood Why did Muslims carried out the Godhra Incident??? . Gujarat Riots were the effect of the Horrifying Godhra Incident.
RE:muslims
by sanjay suri on Jul 07, 2007 11:32 AM Permalink
Its the politicians who used religion to divide Indians.They didnot take any action in KASHMIR when PANDITS were RAPED and GUNNED down.NOBODY WROTE ANYTHING. SIMILARLY WHEN TRAIN WAS SET ON FIRE AND HINDUS BURNT NO QUESTIONS. DEMOGRAPHY OF NE STATES IS CHANGED DUE TO INFLUX OF BANGLADESHI MUSLIMS BUT POLITICIANS HAVE WELCOMED FOR VOTES.BUT WHEN GUJARAT HAPPENS,PSEUDO SECULARISTS CRY WOLF.HOW COME OVER PAST 60 YRS WE HAVE MADRASAS WHICH ARE NOT MODERNISED.WHY DO WE HAVE SHAH BANO'S WHERE SUPREME COURT RULINGS ARE CHANGED BY POLITICIANS ON CALLS BY MULLAHS. IT'S TIME MUSLIMS DO AN INTROSPECTION AND REALISE THAT HOW COME EVERYBODY IN WORLD IS AGAINST THEM?WHY CAN'T THEY BE MORE AMEANABLE.JIS THALI MAIN KHATE HAIN USME CHED TO NA KAREN.YOU BECOME ENGINEER AT INDIAN GOVT COST AND THEN WORK AGAINST THE COUNTRY. SUNNY
RE:muslims
by Hemant on Jul 07, 2007 11:14 AM Permalink
Debangshu, Yes, our PM asks us not to draw conclusions on the involvement of muslims in these attacks. However, he is ready to propose muslims to have their first claim on national reserves. Hypocrites...........
RE:Southern India has become a big base of Islamic terrorism
by Venu gopal on Jul 07, 2007 11:13 AM Permalink
Dear friends please realise that terrorism is realy a social evil.We Indians(most of the illitrate,ignorent and elite Indian people)never realises the truth.We are diluting every incident in the names of social harmony,democracy,secular values etc etc...Just look behind..realise the truth...that how much we had lost within few decades......in the name of these...which is actually suppressing one's national integrity feelings...
I completely understand what you all must be going through and I know it is very difficult to be a Muslim today .
People try to club other struggles with Islamic terrorism . I wud like to clarify that naxals , LTTE and ULFA though terrorists are different from Islamic Terrorism
(Correct me if I am Wrong)
1) About Naxals : They do not have any religion because their source of inspiration is Ideology and it is primarily a class war ,war against the injustice and atrocities commited by a certain class.
2) ULFA : Do you know what is the main reason behind the emergence of ULFA ?? It is the illegal migrants from across the Border (Bangladesh) who have changed the deomgraphic structure of the region completely , ironically they are now waging a war on our country with the help from the same people across the border .
3)Sikh Terrorist :The real reason behind the Sikh terrorism of 80's was the support of the ISI to the Khalistani movement, again here the tone might suggest that it was a religious war but it was primarily a Political war , a fight for nationhood .
4) Tamils and LTTE :Everyone knows that it is a Political war for Nationhood because the Tamil community in SriLanka were treated as second class citizens ...
Though terrorism is terrorism and none can be justified
Now tell me which of the above is a Religious war against the infidels and a War to spread a particular religious Law or to spread the words of a particular Prop
RE:Don't confuse other Struggles with Religious Terrorism
by Trivikram Singaraju on Jul 07, 2007 11:13 AM Permalink
Point-wise: 1) What did the government of Andhra Pradesh or any class in AP do to the Maoists that they are waging war against them and preventing development in Telangana districts thus making the development deprived public to demand for splitting a mother-like state?
2) Who disturbed the lives of north-east tribals and their way of life? Is it christian missionaries or the Hindu's miles away in rest of India? What have we Hindus got to do with it? Wont you call it a religious war? The tribals were priorly very much a part of our Hindu fabric, but now after embracing christianity they started fighting? How is this not a religious war?
3) Are Gulisthan terrorists not an example of religious extremism that they want a seperate country altogther for Sikhs? Did they not target and butcher Hindus on the streets of Punjab?
4) If a bomb blows up in Srinagar, will you call it a fight for Kashmiri nationhood or Islamic terrorism? How can you seperate both? Same anology applies to the Hindu-tamils who cannot live or resolve differences with Sinhali-buddhists non-violently. Its not political war...it is very much racial, linguistic and communalistic. How can we as Hindus sympathise the LTTE?
See if you start justifying and differentiating the use of violence from one terrorist act/outfit to another, then one would be compelled to question the credibility of such a perspective. My point is, regardless of the motive or leanings, violence and terror in all forms and shapes shoul
Dont forget that it is Hindus who first invented suicide bombing. Yes its the LTTE. Very much Hindu. Its unfair to credit muslims for the menace called blowing-oneself up in the name of ideology or freedom sturggle. Dont be hipocratic and blind-eyed to what our own brothers are doing else where. Dont be blind eyed to the fact that it is born-hindu communists who hold and govern 26 districts across 4 states in India publicly waging war through terror gainst the Indian Union, Hindu religious symbols and free spirited Indian life. How are we Hindus different? Why blame some one else for all the strife?
RE:How are we different?
by Trivikram Singaraju on Jul 07, 2007 11:28 AM Permalink
Discussion is for the samke of critical thinking. You are proving my point again...by being intollerant to your own fellow-hindu for the sole reason that he holds a different point of view and calling him an 'idiot'...is this not proof enough that intollerance and hate are more 'humanistic' than 'religious'?
RE:How are we different?
by Bhaskar Srinivasan on Jul 07, 2007 11:14 AM Permalink
havent you heard of Hara Kiri mate? Dont blame the LTTE for 'inventing' suicide bombings - its as old as history!
RE:How are we different?
by prasad on Jul 07, 2007 11:12 AM Permalink
Are they being waged in the name of hinduism. Dont link the LTTE with tamils in TN or hinduism. They are terrorists, but their ideology is to have a ownership in governance.
The naxals are a breed of communists who want a certain wealth distribution. Much like the communists they are secular with their destructive power and are not waging it in the name of a religion
You have a good point, but you have used horrible examples.
The innocent boys have been caught and harrased. I smell the handiwork of our own RAW to spoil the image of Indian Muslims. Everybody knows that RAW has been working in alliance with RSS.
