Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 318 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10   Older >   >>
RSS/BJP supporters write comments to save their corrupted leaders.
by Sahadevan KK on Jul 03, 2007 11:52 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

RSS/BJP supporters write comments to save their corrupted leaders.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:RE:RSS/BJP supporters write comments to save their corrupted leaders.
by Senthil on Jul 03, 2007 12:05 PM  Permalink
Are you a UPA then

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RSS/BJP supporters write comments to save their corrupted leaders.
by Ashok S on Jul 03, 2007 11:59 AM  Permalink
If you are talking about the truth my friend, you can see the way Indians are living. You can see the way wealth was distributed in the last 60 years of our Independence. You can see the way young 'leaders' are groomed. The son of God goes abroad for studies. He comes back to assume that he is the next PM of India. You are ready to worship him because you are a believer in the son of God. The Brahmins who treated the backwards like dogs are no more alive. It is people like you who bring back the ghosts of those Brahmins. Why are you also not inviting the ghosts of Mohammed Ghori, Clive , General Dyer? According to you, only Brahmins have wronged in the past. My friend, see things in a proper perspective. You will have better answers to my questions.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RSS/BJP supporters write comments to save their corrupted leaders.
by Sahadevan KK on Jul 03, 2007 12:07 PM  Permalink
You must tell me after the elections, if you have got something from the mudsling...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RSS/BJP supporters write comments to save their corrupted leaders.
by parthasarathy sarathy on Jul 03, 2007 12:35 PM  Permalink
Dear Sahadevan,

Getting elected does not prove innocence. Karunanidhi has got elected so many times, Lalu Yadav lesser number of times but does that absolve them of all their criminal acts, swindling of public money and harassment of the public? Have some sense and have the ability to think beyond Brahmins / RSS / BJP and with a national perspective. Any fool other than the Congress rascals and DMK scoundrels and their similar and friendly counterparts in other states would have developed this country at least 50 times more than what has happened in the last 60 years. That's the bitter truth of your congress - commie (comical also) rule.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RSS/BJP supporters write comments to save their corrupted leaders.
by irfanb on Jul 03, 2007 12:11 PM  Permalink
Left politician are worst then German Nazi

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Nasty things by nasty politicians. It will not help our opposition.
by Sahadevan KK on Jul 03, 2007 11:50 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Nasty things by nasty politicians. It will not help our opposition.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Nasty things by nasty politicians. It will not help our opposition.
by irfanb on Jul 03, 2007 12:08 PM  Permalink
Please donot forget Nandigram and Singur . Left politicians are worst then German Nazi Buddhadev Bhattacharya is worst then Hitler

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Nasty things by nasty politicians. It will not help our opposition.
by Ram Sharma on Jul 03, 2007 12:12 PM  Permalink
dear sahadevan



when unprincipled congressmen r there, who cannot remain united, when out of power, without the dynastic stick; then u cannot criticise any other politician of the country. congress party is a party of & for the dynasty. no congressman can utter a word against the opinions of sonia, rahul, priyanka. this is not democracy but monarchy.



opportunistic politicians like the left, dmk, sharad pawar; who r fierce critics of the party have supported sonia, whose party received only 145/545 seats in loksabha to run the government from behind the scene by pulling the strings of puppet m m singh.



patil was the last choice of sonia after p mukherjee (doubtful sycophant as per sonia), shivraj patil (inefficient and communal as per left), dr karan singh (communal as per left), shinde, m l vora, arjun singh (doubtful sycophant as per sonia) etc were rejected by sonia, left and mayawati.



now they r shouting that it is women's empowerment.



it is unfortunate that patil is having so many criminal and financial charges against her, who took more than a year and declaration of presidential candidature to sign the anti conversion bill, who says she talks to ghost and who said that pardah started after moghul invasion, is the candidate supported by the ruling coalition.



last time 'communal' bjp did not go for a bjp person to b made the president and it went for a muslim and highly respected person like kalam for presidency.

SHAME ON U THE BLIND DYNASTY SUPPORTER

   Forward   |   Report abuse
the VERDICT by SC justifies the reasons of PETITIONER
by rachita bholowalia on Jul 03, 2007 11:50 AM  Permalink 

yes by all means SC did not reject the PETITION in TOTO--simply this case was not be heard by SC the PETITIONER was advised to seek redressal at a proper place UNDER PRESENT CIRCUMSTANCES (note it)--SC wanted material for its immediate decision but PETITIONER was not in a position to seek more time to collect photocopy of all records reqd.WELL DONE PETITIONER as tomorrow CONG criminals IN JAIL OR ON BAIL EXTORTIONIST DUPLIATE CHARACTER COMRADES(now supported by their sworn enemy as communal) WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO SAY THAT NO CASE WAS FILED IN COURTS-- LALITKUMAR

    Forward  |  Report abuse
PIL against Pratibha Patil
by m m on Jul 03, 2007 11:49 AM  Permalink 

"Bench gave liberty to the petitioner for approaching appropriate authorities" THIS MEANS THE JUDGE IS CONVINCED ABOUT THE CHARGED AND IS FEARED THE CONSEQUENCES FROM CONGRESS & ITS SUPREMO

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Judgement
by AMRIT SINGH on Jul 03, 2007 11:47 AM  Permalink 

Would it have been the same judgement today, if a same sort of case was there against Shekhawat

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Its pity
by shekhar deshmukh on Jul 03, 2007 11:46 AM  Permalink 

Its pity to say that this is our contry. you do any fraud and crime and can become a president of the nation.
Till yesterday this lady was not heard by anyone and today is going to be our president
Shame on us.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
bribe
by kartik on Jul 03, 2007 11:46 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

How much she bribed the judge to get this petition dismissed. Now I think all her cases will be dropped.

The Supreme court is protecting the criminals or with criminal background. How many times we hear abt sanjay dutts hearing date but there would not be any news about it. Media should also find out what is happening behind this.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:bribe
by Gr on Jul 03, 2007 11:47 AM  Permalink
Do you know what you said will lead to contempt of court ?
Do you know you the facts of the case ?



   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:bribe
by Ram Sharma on Jul 03, 2007 11:47 AM  Permalink
dear kartik

though i am strongly against the candidature of patil, who has a dubious past and a strange present, i think u should not pass such remarks against sc. judiciary is the only branch of indian democracy, which is far better and less corrupt than others.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:bribe
by Sanjay on Jul 03, 2007 11:44 AM  Permalink
Ask the onece suspended police constable Shekawat how much he got bribe?


   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:bribe
by Ram Sharma on Jul 03, 2007 11:47 AM  Permalink
dear sanjay

sekhawat is far better than sonia sycophant patil.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:bribe
by kartik on Jul 03, 2007 11:56 AM  Permalink
You shit maharastrian, why are you supporting her, even after so many skeletons are tumbling? I am neither supporting the constable.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
SC saved this country
by Sanjay on Jul 03, 2007 11:45 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Thank god SC helped this country by not giving chance to Shekawat, once suspended police constable for taking bribe. Oh Gos what a disaster this country was facing......

Bharat mataki je!!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:SC saved this country
by m m on Jul 03, 2007 11:55 AM  Permalink
Say Sonia Mataki Jai saale congress ke chamcha. READ WHAT THE COURT SAID
"Bench gave liberty to the petitioner for approaching appropriate authorities" THIS MEANS THE JUDGE IS CONVINCED ABOUT THE CHARGED AND IS FEARED THE CONSEQUENCES FROM CONGRESS & ITS SUPREMO


   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:SC saved this country
by Manohar Rao on Jul 03, 2007 11:49 AM  Permalink
Either you are a fool or a blind congress suporter.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:SC saved this country
by Ram Sharma on Jul 03, 2007 11:49 AM  Permalink
dear sanjay

instead of saying 'bharat mata ki je', u should have written 'sonia antonio itali mata ki jai'. that fits u more.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
RE:RE:RE:SC saved this country
by Ashok S on Jul 03, 2007 12:03 PM  Permalink
If you are talking about the truth my friend, you can see the way Indians are living. You can see the way wealth was distributed in the last 60 years of our Independence. You can see the way young 'leaders' are groomed. The son of God goes abroad for studies. He comes back to assume that he is the next PM of India. You are ready to worship him because you are a believer in the son of God. The Brahmins who treated the backwards like dogs are no more alive. It is people like you who bring back the ghosts of those Brahmins. Why are you also not inviting the ghosts of Mohammed Ghori, Clive , General Dyer? According to you, only Brahmins have wronged in the past. My friend, see things in a proper perspective. You will have better answers to my questions.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:RE:SC saved this country
by R A Sharma on Jul 03, 2007 02:52 PM  Permalink
dear mandar

india is not the property of bjp. but it is also not the property of sonia also. the people of india gave her party only 145/545 seatsin loksabha, in up also, her home state, her party got only 22 seats out of about 450. but bcoz of opportunistic politics in the country, she is behaving as if she has got 3/4 th of loksabha seats. she is imposing her wish on the country and did not try for consensus, as was done by bjp last time and dr kalam, a wise man was selected.

keep your cool by seeing ramdev baba's programme and doing pranayam.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:RE:SC saved this country
by Ram Sharma on Jul 03, 2007 12:22 PM  Permalink
dear mandar

my reply to u was blocked even before anyone could see it. this is when your sonia is having only puppet pm, what will happen when she has a puppet president also?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:SC saved this country
by Ajay P on Jul 03, 2007 11:42 AM  Permalink
Sanjay, you are the lone supporter of Pratibha,any relation to her...

May be you are not an Indian....

I don't think a true Indian would like to comment or support something which is wrong for country...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:SC saved this country
by Ashok S on Jul 03, 2007 11:56 AM  Permalink
If you are talking about the truth my friend, you can see the way Indians are living. You can see the way wealth was distributed in the last 60 years of our Independence. You can see the way young 'leaders' are groomed. The son of God goes abroad for studies. He comes back to assume that he is the next PM of India. You are ready to worship him because you are a believer in the son of God. The Brahmins who treated the backwards like dogs are no more alive. It is people like you who bring back the ghosts of those Brahmins. Why are you also not inviting the ghosts of Mohammed Ghori, Clive , General Dyer? According to you, only Brahmins have wronged in the past. My friend, see things in a proper perspective. You will have better answers to my questions.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:SC saved this country
by kartik on Jul 03, 2007 11:48 AM  Permalink
he must be a maharashtrian, as simple as that, any maharasthrian will support any other maharasthtrain for them marathi people are their pride even if they are criminals.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:SC saved this country
by SLVP on Jul 03, 2007 12:45 PM  Permalink
pratibha is not maharashtrian. but a rajasthani.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:SC saved this country
by R A Sharma on Jul 03, 2007 02:55 PM  Permalink
dear SLVP

she is maharashtriyan that is the reason raj thakre and shiv sena, both pro maharashtriyans r supporting her.

she is married to a rajasthani, sekhawat, but she neither uses that sur name nor mr sekhawat lives in rajasthan, he also lives in maharastra.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
pratibha katil
by ravi.k on Jul 03, 2007 11:44 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

INSAAF FOR SALE.
SUPREME COURT- THE BIGGEST SUPERMARKET FOR JUSTICE....COME BUY SOME.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:pratibha katil
by Sameer Bhagwat on Jul 03, 2007 11:42 AM  Permalink
abuse not our court of supremty. Please no insult the tallest court.We should respect our country and its countrymen and all the things of dinity,divinity etc in ours country.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:pratibha katil
by ravi.k on Jul 03, 2007 11:51 AM  Permalink
dear sameer, is there dignity and divinity left ???

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:pratibha katil
by Ram Sharma on Jul 03, 2007 11:51 AM  Permalink
dear ravi



though i am strongly against the candidature of patil with dubious past and strange present, u should not criticise judiciary, who r far better and less corrupt than other branches of our democracy.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
RE:Supreme court dismisses PIL against Pratibha
by ravi.k on Jul 03, 2007 11:46 AM  Permalink
bil kul sahi bola

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 318 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10   Older >   >>
Write a message