Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 9683 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 306 | 307 | 308 | 309 | 310   Older >   >>
Hindus fighting among themselves
by John thompson on Feb 17, 2007 11:03 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

If Hinduism is so good why were hindus fighting among themselves, Dalits, untaouchables, caste, Brahmins cutting hands of lowere casts, Sati etc etc. Tell me why, if it is religion of peace and hindus are tolerant. HIndu rajas were fighting and raping each others women. See in mahabharata wife is used in gambing...

    Forward  |  'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Writer seems to be not knowing the present Indian Situation
by Michael Raj on Feb 17, 2007 10:59 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Dear Mr. Writer,

You seem to be not knowing the present situation prevailing in India. You have quoted about France, Germany and other countries where people have forgiven each other and live hand in hand. We indians have more tolerance than those Europeans, and we have been living as brothers and Sisters in a multi-religious, secular country. But the problem in our country is that, a few self proclaimed protectors of Religions do not allow us to live in a harmonious way, they will rake up this issue of Aurangazeb's atrocities and make the illiterate population(their followers)think that the muslims of today are the direct descendants of Aurangazeb, and will unleash violence on these innocent people. We do not want to have more problems in India. Already we have enough and more problems to be solved which are hampering the growth of our country.

I think, you do not know the meaning of Pastoral prudence. Nehru knew this, that is why he has hidden the truth about Aurangazeb, and has asked people to praise him. He wanted an united India where everybody lives happily hand in hand. We Indians are not bothered about burying certain harmful truths which would hamper our harmony than proclaiming them openly and suffer a lot. Let our sufferingg be over with this. Even if we are proclaiming the false things about Aurangazeb, and promote religious harmony, let us also be false an be happy. Please do not rake up this "so called truth" and put us in trouble. You have your findings with you, and bury them within yourself. We are not interested in your truth. We are interested in the unity of our country and the happiness of our own people.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
The truth about Aurangzeb
by narayanan srinivasan on Feb 17, 2007 10:54 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Any act of violence in the name of religion should not be tolerated.
Any special rite or law favouring a religion is wrong.The law should be common for all in a country.
Muslim fanatics involving in terrorism are to be dealt with severely.
In India people from all relegions are to be treated alike.
Our social problems will disappear only if the caste based reservations are removed & if we treat the politicians(they are the devils behind any problem in our country) in the way they deserve to be treated.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:The truth about Aurangzeb
by essa sait on Feb 17, 2007 11:18 AM  Permalink
You r not true, when u said there should be a common law. The reoson being there r many believes which according to muslim can be practiceble, but may not be as per general law. But regarding your point about punishing "fanatist" - (A group which cause distruction under the wrong names of religion) - and islam has stated what kind of punishment should be given to them & u believe it or not the punishment by islam to such group, even if he calls himself muslim is more severe that any present law.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
RE:As said in Koran, Islam is going to die 1400 years after its birth
by PANIWALA AMIN A on Feb 17, 2007 11:11 AM  Permalink
Your comment make it clear that - Equivalent to ignorant Muslinms, even educated non-muslims also get misled, by the hear-say.

can you tell the Surah and ayat number of quran - which you have traslated?

It will be national service - if you reply as it will also serve as a knowledge to may other misguided persons.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:As said in Koran, Islam is going to die 1400 years after its birth
by mhd idhirees khan on Feb 17, 2007 11:20 AM  Permalink
Hey sanjay,



what u know about quaran. if u r not expert, just shut ur a.....



what is 9/11 and who suffered in that incident. The isalmians may die but not islam. It will be there for ever.



what is going on at srilanka, nepal and assam





   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
MUGAL DINESTY
by Rohit Rajesh on Feb 17, 2007 10:48 AM  Permalink 

What do you people except during one man show

Rajesh ( brunei Darussalam)

    Forward  |  Report abuse
real history
by Samir Ankalikar on Feb 17, 2007 10:48 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

it is wrong to say that only aurangzeb was cruel. even his forefathers were no angels.
Akbar , Jahangir and Shahjahan were equally cruel but the opposite has been
taught in history books.
Aurangzeb is remembered for his atrcocities because he was the last powerful mughal emperor.
if Akbar , jahangir and Shahjahan were tolerant , then were people like Rana Pratap or sikh Gurus like Argan Dev and Teghbahadur mad to oppose them ?
also never has any muslim ruler built any mosque or garden or fort.
if so there is no existing islamic book like Vastu Shastra just as hindus have.
Existing structures were conquered and used by these barbarians and in history it has been noted as follows:
"Shahjahan built tajmahal" or "Akbar built fatehpur sikri".
it has now been proved that TajMahal was a Hindu temple and existed when Babur arrived in India.
( Babur was an ancestor of Shahjahan ). if Shahjahan could construct a huge building like Taj after his wife's death, then why did he not make any bigger buildings for her when she was alive.
i dont know why our governments are so shy in accepting the fact that the 1000 year muslim rule in India was worse than the Nazi occupation of Poland or Russia.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:real history
by Irfan Khan on Feb 17, 2007 11:20 AM  Permalink
If the mughals rule was so bad then today 100 crore Hindus not live in India today. If they are so cruel then they convert all the hindus why akbar not convert jodhabai. If The Taj Mehal is temple then shahjahan did the good thing to convert into the Taj Mahal Because today at least we have One wonder of the world in India if there is Temple like Khajuraho who whi will going to see.

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
RE:RE:real history
by dr neerja kamal on Feb 17, 2007 11:29 AM  Permalink
Your ans itself tells what islam is like. while a hindu can go to mosque &say its prayer not many muslims can do this & you are accepting this, which is good . atleas you are trying not to name islamic terrorist organisations which everyone knows anyway. by the way hinduism never teaches us against any other religion & hello we are talking about buildings of India ok so please keep your sarcasm of eiffel tower to yourself. SHUKRIYA

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Whah Zeb
by Joseph Kulangara on Feb 17, 2007 10:47 AM  Permalink 

If we dig the past, then so many inhuman deeds of our Rulers and politicians will come up and it will lead to unrest and hatred amongst us. Wisdom says to keep quiet to a certain extent and resolve/restore these matters through dialogues and mutual understandings. If we siphon our limited energy to the well being of our next generation and downplay these matteres our generation next will surely respect us and time will resove this amicably.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
This can be only India
by Observer Observer on Feb 17, 2007 10:45 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

It can be only in India that a foreginer like farncois gautier is let loose to spread venom and divide the society as long as his agenda confirms to RSS VHP and other Hindu Militant Oragnization ,no wonder a saint like Mother Teresa is not accepted by teh Hindu Nazis but a hired Hindunazi propagandist finds place in the fundamentalist Hindu society, this self styled and self proclaimed FRENCH historian is writing utter nonsense without any references and proof , his whole aim like rediff.com seems to be to further the agenda of Hindu terrorist organizations like VHP Bajrang Dal etc.

If Aurangzeb was such a bad guy they you need to look at the temples in Aurangabad which were given regular donations and maintenace funds by him, if the Muslim rulers were so bad and forced people to conversion all of India would be Muslim after 1100 years of rule.

The attemps by the Hindunazi thinktank and "hired propagandist" like Farncois is to create a rift amongst the different religious minorities in India by propagating lies and exagerating the conflict of the Mughals and the early Sikhs.But the fact is that Aurangzeb was applying the rule of the law and crushing the rebellion in Punjab atleast he did not kill innocents like Hindu fundamnetalists do against Muslims and Sikhs and Christians, the Hindunazis and the Hindu fundamentalists called Bhindranwale a terrorist when he was also doing teh same to have a independent Sikh land , what right does India have to control sikhs and punjab , they have a different identity and different religion and right deserve a nation,but the confused hired and underpaid Hindunazi think-tank comprising individuals like Francoise is unethical and unprofessional in their profession of propaganda.

    Forward  |  'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
RE:This can be only India
by krishna vadakkepatte on Feb 17, 2007 11:23 AM  Permalink
don't streach it boss. It is a point of view and seems to be based on some research. It is not about hindu and muslim it is about Shri Aurangazeb and the rest unless you are related to him.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:This can be only India
by Qasim on Feb 17, 2007 11:02 AM  Permalink
Great! You have summed up everything in an excellent way.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:This can be only India
by sachin bhanudas kulkarni on Feb 17, 2007 11:34 AM  Permalink
this is most rediculous defence of muslim rulers in India. This truth is as clear as sun that the muslim rulers were tyrrants and did everything to opress hindu community, physically as well as mentally. As the writer has said, truely ,likes of aurangzeb would have converted whole of india forcefully to islam had it been not for resistance by greats like Chhatrapati Shivaji, Peshwwas and many in rajasthan and Punjab. Calling RSS a terrorist or Nazis is not only an insult to a great organisation which has contributed to a social cause in big way, but also shows disappointment of the writer over waking up of hindu community to defend their religion from forced conversions and retaliate against atrocities of politically protected minorities. Never in the history of India, you will find a record of forced or even persued conversion to hinduism whereas there are so many examples of the same by westerns and muslims. What can be more glaring example of atrocities on hindus in modern India, than the killing and chasing away of kashmiri pandits from their own homeland.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 9683 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 306 | 307 | 308 | 309 | 310   Older >   >>
Write a message