My next door people are muslim. The house wife now control her husband by shouting 'meri baat nehi sunoge to main Taslima ban jaungi'. What a silent revolution is under way !
RE:Taslima in every muslim house
by Fantastic on Dec 22, 2007 05:17 PM Permalink
My dear there are links to where silently muslims are throwing arabic culture. But it is failed to understand that why conversion is ban in muslim countries? What is the reason of fear? Common balaord!! giving the links does not properly address the bigotory acts.
RE:Taslima in every muslim house
by Indianking on Dec 22, 2007 05:17 PM Permalink
Still I am telling you. Quantity doesn't matter quality matter. When islam was found initially it was accepted by few people. Now 28% population follow it. Moral of story is, we should increase quality in our religion then quantity.
RE:Taslima in every muslim house
by kaj on Dec 22, 2007 06:52 PM Permalink
You crap, piece of shit born to eat dung your nose can enter sewerage to only sniff and enjoy stinks! your tongue knows to deliberately lick only the excreta.
every religion project some race(caste) in high esteem Chritianity-jews Islam-arabs Hinduism-brahmins All religios are man made.It is futile to trust them and fight on thm.Still lot of people wate their time,money and energy on useless religions.Any way everybody will learn the no god after paying heavy price of ruining the world(lready 50% over)
RE:All religions get lost from earth
by prakash on Dec 22, 2007 05:11 PM Permalink
Mr. Tamilian Santhanam, are you sure Mohammed was a man ? We have so many man made religions, but Islam !!!!
RE:RE:All religions get lost from earth
by Vinod Pandey on Dec 22, 2007 05:33 PM Permalink
Islam is a Great religion. Only the misintreperters of Shariat, Holy Koran and Hadis have created all types of misgivings about Jehad and kafirs. No rreligion or raace is strong enough to wipe out the other from thos Global. The only solution is live in Peace and follow the principal of "Jio and Jine Do'
RE:All religions get lost from earth
by balaord on Dec 22, 2007 05:16 PM Permalink
Islam projects Arabs??Oh man, have you read any book on islam?Arabs were the bitterest enemy of Islam during its infancy days.
RE:All religions get lost from earth
by Vinod Pandey on Dec 22, 2007 05:21 PM Permalink
First correct yourself about Christanity and Jews. Go into the history books to know about the Jews and then make controversial remarks.
RE:RE:Quran's don'ts
by balaord on Dec 22, 2007 05:11 PM Permalink
Prakah.Go to some serious place where Islamic criminal law is practices.You will find how seriously they take sexual moralilities and deal with its violations. You know a practising Muslim will scream for serious punishment at the sight of a adulterer,yet you accuse Muslims of laxity.
RE:Quran's don'ts
by Vinod Pandey on Dec 22, 2007 05:25 PM Permalink
If a Muslim lady is raped in a Muslim country like Pakistan she is held guilty of immorality and punished. Otherwise she has to produce eyewitnesses to prove the beastlity of other person and sure a stronger one. Do rapist moves along with eye witness to commit shuch henious crime or rapes are committed in public places. Why women are treated as a second class citizen in Islamic coutries. Prophet saheb has never taught this to his followers.
RE:Quran's don'ts
by prakash on Dec 22, 2007 05:33 PM Permalink
Mr. Balaord, your reply is not the answer of my question. It is an intentional bypass. I understand your difficulties....
That is the reason.Mahabharata is with 9verse.Basically it is a dialogue between Arjuna and Lord Krishnaa. It is a human psychology. You cannot have the mind the complete human psychology because it is independent. You cannot cover the whole human psychology in 660 pages.You cannot .Human psychology is much beyond it.And it is still evolving.That is the reason Sanatana Dharama does not have the end.It is evolving day by day.
RE:RE:>>balaord
by Fantastic on Dec 22, 2007 05:28 PM Permalink
>>>>Sami Common Sammi again u come up with Dr. Zakir liar version. Again if u have guts to read please read the following line 1. That Shri Krushna does not possess any material body. I had already given quotes from Gita. ajo api sann avyayatma bhutanam isvaro 'pi san prakrtim svaam adhishthaya sambhavamy atma-maayaya (Bhagavad Gita 4-6) ajah--unborn; api--though; san--being so; avyaya--imperishable; atma--Self or Spirit; bhutanam--all living beings( those who are born); isvarah--the Supreme Lord or controller; api--although; san--being so; prakrtim svaam--My own essential nature(of being without material/subtle body); adhishthaya--being so situated or established; sambhavami--I manifest Myself; atma-maayaya--Power or Wisdom or Consciousness of HimSelf. Although I am Unborn, of imperishable Spirit (as in body, soul and spirit i.e. Krishna says HE has no material/subtle body), though I am Lord of all living beings, established in MY OWN ESSENTIAL NATURE(Purna=complete and perfect Spiritual nature without material/subtle body), I manifest Myself through MY OWN Power. avyaktam vyaktim apannam manyante mam abuddhayah param bhavam ajananto mamavyayam anuttamam(Bhagavad Gita 7:24)
RE:>>balaord
by prakash on Dec 22, 2007 05:02 PM Permalink
Can these "One Book, One God and One King" fellows ever understand such deep theory, Mr. Fantastic ?
RE:>>balaord
by balaord on Dec 22, 2007 05:17 PM Permalink
Prakash - the Modern science owes its birth to islamof course a empty head like you dont understand these things..
RE:>>balaord
by Fantastic on Dec 22, 2007 05:26 PM Permalink
>>> the Modern science owes its birth to >>>islamof course a empty head like you dont >>>understand these things Islam has the history of taking other goodies work in their name. I have given u one of the example that one of your ancestor called Aryabhata who invented the concept of Zero, now one of the arab scholar had successfully taken the credit of Aryabhat's work in his name. Man get up!!Please do extensive research on the Islamic philosophers book, You will find that most of the works are from Greek philosopher like of Aristototle. Common..i donot thing that any body will stop u for research.Please do research for at least Greek's work.You will be able to expose.
RE:RE:>>balaord
by balaord on Dec 22, 2007 05:33 PM Permalink
It is true ZERO is a concept used in India,before Arabs started using it.but to say Aryahbatta invented Zero is a idiotic argument. Muslims never denied that,Infact acknowldged that as Hind numbers before westerns called it Arabic numbers.. But i dont understand your argument?just because of zero how can you deny what i am saying..? Do you know Mayans and samirians had number systems too?it failed because it was never used as extensivly as Arabs used Hindu nu,mber system
RE:>>balaord
by balaord on Dec 22, 2007 05:29 PM Permalink
Fantastic -Instead of arguing with me , you should better argue with keith devlin the executive director of standford univeristy and the influential memeber of American mathematical association. education.guardian.co.uk/higher/sciences/story/0,12243,786006,00.html This link , is a artile he wrote on Guardian UK newspapaer
RE:RE:>>balaord
by Fantastic on Dec 22, 2007 05:09 PM Permalink
It cann't be. One book cannot be the ultimate truth or have comple human psychology. Even you can find yourselves here in rediff, many people have different views. Only islam has abandones the free thaughts for debate.That is the reason the muslims are subjected to become the most gullible creed and has taken the path of disastrous of the whole human kind.
RE:>>balaord
by Sami on Dec 22, 2007 05:27 PM Permalink
you should not use the word cannot when it related to god. God is the one who knows in and out of all
It is propogated that a muslim must keep beard like Mohammed. In such case what would people from Mongolian race do ? Wear artificial beard to keeps Arabs happy ?
RE:Beard in Islam
by balaord on Dec 22, 2007 05:08 PM Permalink
Who told Mongolians cant grow beard?? It is just they are not dense..any way i appreciate for your weird thinking and the applicablity of Islam for Mangolian race.. Do you know,Mongols embraced the very religion Islam after they slaughtered Muslims in Babgdahd Who do you think Babur,Timur and all the Khans. They are all decedants of Mongols.. Come out of your closet and read some serious history books
RE:Beard in Islam
by prakash on Dec 22, 2007 05:19 PM Permalink
Mr. Balaord, Islam has failed to enter the entire Mangolian border. We see a few patches in the western border os China where some people live like muslims. There are no significant presence of Islam in Japan, Korea and Mongolia because of strong physical and cultural differences. Babur, Timur and other Khans enjoyed Islam because it helped them to practise barbarianism.
RE:Haz
by balaord on Dec 22, 2007 04:42 PM Permalink
No Muslim is ever required to give any money to Hundi as in other religions.No muslim is giving any money to any cleric as you guys have to do it for many saints and pujaris. There are no institutions that takes money from Muslims be it is Mecca or Kanpur
RE:Haz
by prakash on Dec 22, 2007 04:46 PM Permalink
But you have to pay for the journey and in hotel-motels, isn't it ? That itself is a big income. Soudies use to servive on this income till the end of 19th century, my dear Balaord !
RE:RE:Haz
by balaord on Dec 22, 2007 05:13 PM Permalink
what kind of perverted logic is this? If Mecca was in Australia, you guys would have accused australians of imperialism!!!
RE:Haz
by prakash on Dec 22, 2007 05:53 PM Permalink
If Mecca was in Australia, Ausies would have surely turned it into an exciting tourist city for fun and......
RE:Haz
by ashwani mehta on Dec 22, 2007 06:01 PM Permalink
arabs exploit the poor young bangladeshi and pakistani boys and tie them to horses . they rape maids from all over the third world countries . do not allow any other religion to be practiced there
RE:RE:Haz
by Fantastic on Dec 22, 2007 04:46 PM Permalink
COMMON BALAORD.... MUSJID IS NOT MADE BY GOD BUT BY HUMAN WITH COST..... COME OUT THE NEXSUS BETWEEN ARAB SHEIKHA AND POOR MUSLIM MASJID.
RE:Haz
by balaord on Dec 22, 2007 05:05 PM Permalink
Oh boy!!! The biggest liability for Islam is Arab shieks due for their undying servitude to americans..Who do you think Muslims ae fighting against??They are shiks of arabia,dictators of egpypt,jordan and syria.It is a irony that you guys are calling Muslims as Arabophiles.
RE:Haz
by Fantastic on Dec 22, 2007 05:15 PM Permalink
Yes ! Muslims are in arabic imperiliasm. Most of the rituals are from arid arabic culture. You are slaves to Arabs and arabic cultures.U people have thwarted your ancestors philosophy and wisdome.It is astonishing to see how blind you people are.
Religion is way of life and depend on your culture and surrounding environment.
1. Condition for Islam is suitable for middle east so it is spreaded there. 2. Condition for hinduism is suitable for south asia so hinduism is spreaded here. 3. Condition for Buddhism is suitable in china / Japan so it is spreaded there.
I think it is hard that other religion can exists long in south Asia.
RE:We are prowed on ourselves
by prakash on Dec 22, 2007 04:32 PM Permalink
Muslim beleives custodians of Jannat are also Arabs.... True Arabian imperialism !
RE:We are prowed on ourselves
by balaord on Dec 22, 2007 04:32 PM Permalink
Islam demolished Racism,If a Arab comes and says He is superior to indians.We Muslims will be first to kick his butt
RE:We are prowed on ourselves
by prakash on Dec 22, 2007 05:25 PM Permalink
No Mr. Balaord. Western dress doesn't make one Christian, nor a Dhoti make a person Hindu. But there is an uneasy feeling with this 'jubba' attached with. It gives you the impression of a barbarian.....
RE:We are prowed on ourselves
by Fantastic on Dec 22, 2007 05:03 PM Permalink
>>>Islam demolished Racism Can u explore reddiff previous news on Indonesia.
RE:We are prowed on ourselves
by Indianking on Dec 22, 2007 04:42 PM Permalink
I also know that arabs are even christian and jew also. What I mean to say it was arab only who stretched their empire.
RE:We are prowed on ourselves
by tamilan santhanam on Dec 22, 2007 05:02 PM Permalink
every religion project some race(caste) in high esteem Chritianity-jews Islam-arabs Hinduism-brahmins All religios are man made.It is futile to trust them and fight on thm.Still lot of people wate their time,money and energy on useless religions.Any way everybody will learn the no god after paying heavy price of ruining the world(lready 50% over)
The word Hindu is not a religious word. It is secular in origin. It is derived from the word Sindhu, which is the name of a major river that flows in the northwestern region of the Indian subcontinent. The ancient Greeks and Armenians used to refer the people living beyond the river Sindhu as Hindus and gradually the name struck. When the Muslims came to the sub continent they called the people living in the region as Hindustanis to distinguish them from the foreign Muslims. Subsequently when the British established their rule, they started calling the local religions collectively under the name of Hinduism.
It is interesting to note that the word is neither Sanskrit nor Dravidian and did not originate in India. It was not used by Indians in their descriptions or writings till the 17th century. If we go by the original definition of the word Hindu, any one who lives in the subcontinent is a Hindu and whatever religion he or she practices is Hinduism. The word Hindu is a secular word and literally translated it means Indian and the word Hinduism denotes any religion or religions that are practiced by the multitude of people living in the land beyond the river Indus.
RE:SO What is the Fight For??
by krishna ramesh on Dec 22, 2007 05:24 PM Permalink
THE RESEARCH IS DONE BY YOU ONLY I THINK.HINDUS MEANS SECULAR.MUSLIMS FUNDAMENTALIST.THERE IS NO CONNECTION BETWEEN SINDU AND SECULARISM.HINDUISM MEANS TOLERENT RELIGEON.NOW WE ARE TOO MUCH TOLERENT MORE PROBLEM .WE HAVE CREATED PAKISTAN BANGLASESH THEY ARE SENDING TERRORIST.IF YOU CONTINOUSLY BECOME MORE AND MORE TOLRENT GOD ONLY COME TO EARTH AND PROTECT US.UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN RELIGEON IS GOOD WHAT ABOUT SOME CROOKS TAKES ADNANTAGE
RE:SO What is the Fight For??
by Fantastic on Dec 22, 2007 04:48 PM Permalink
Please explore more ie beyond mulla version of hinduism. Donot hesistate to explore yourself.
