RE:RE:RE:IDD MUBARAK
by BhejaFry on Dec 19, 2007 06:20 PM Permalink
bcos of a unproven story of abraham who tried to sacrifice his son,but god replaced his son with a goat at the last minute.
RE:IDD MUBARAK
by BhejaFry on Dec 19, 2007 06:24 PM Permalink
their throats are slit by sharp knives 3 times,the goat does not die instantly, but suffers in pain for some time before it dies.this cruel method ( which is supposed to make the meat more tasty ) is called HALAL.
RE:RE:IDD MUBARAK
by BhejaFry on Dec 19, 2007 07:17 PM Permalink
hindus do eat meat, but they dont justify it using silly reasons like the abraham story and we don't use cruel HALAL method.
RE:RE:IDD MUBARAK
by BhejaFry on Dec 19, 2007 06:25 PM Permalink
only if the bakri's were able to speak , how would they express their grief ? Why do they have to sacrifice their life for somebody else to fulfil their religious obligation ?
RE:RE:IDD MUBARAK
by Ram Chauthariya on Dec 19, 2007 06:52 PM Permalink
His birthplace is still the most intolerant nation on earth. Look at the Hajj going on right now. You think any Hindu can go there?? And out stupid Govt. pays Muslims to go to Hajj which discriminates against all other Indians
If only our 1st PM Nehru had basics of History .He gave priority to development over security. He introduce socialisim which failed miserable in blackmarket & licience raj.Many talented Indians migrated to west.India came in control of sychpants,lazy castist & corroupt rulers/buracrates.If he would have given priority to security today whole kashmir would have been part of india, Tibet would have been independant country.Pakistan would have been broken in number of pieces.
RE:Security comes 1st ,development will follow
by Ram Chauthariya on Dec 19, 2007 06:59 PM Permalink
Why blame only Nehru? Mahatma, Indira and even the current Govt has socialist tendencies and they still do not understand Islam.
RE:Security comes 1st ,development will follow
by pranam on Dec 19, 2007 06:32 PM Permalink
Ram Nehru was a romantacist.He lived in a dream world Razzackers attack on Kasmir did not open his eyes,When China secrewed us in 1962 he woke up It was too late
To all the armchair critics of the India's missile program who cannot distinguish between a ballistic missile and fireworks, i request you to use this time and read. India's missile program compares favourably with most of the superpowers in the world. Considering the lack of funding and embargos on technology transfer that we have to contend with our scientists have done an excellent job. I wish them all the best in the future eventually our missile program would be up there with the best in the world. Let us encourage them and not make stupid comments. They have embarked on a very ambitious missile defence project in which even the US hasnt succeeded yet.
RE:Good Job DRDO
by Bala Iyer on Dec 19, 2007 06:21 PM Permalink
Congrats to our Missile Scientists. It's only a matter of time before they are inducted into our armed forces. Our 'MS's' are so good that when (many years ago) Mr.Arunachalam of our DRD visited the US, instructions were given the he be not taken / shown their WIP on missiles!
The morons who think they can speak against the test should also list what missile currently outperformes the Akash or will out perform it in next 2-3 years...
RE:Morons
by Bhola on Dec 19, 2007 06:23 PM Permalink
I dont know about Russian or European systems but the USA has Standard Missile sysems built in 1970 and upgraded in 1980s able to hit surface to air targets for ballistic missile defense purposes, deployed in their ships and can hit at speeds of mach 4.5 to destroy targets.
and yes congratulation to the team behind Indian missile systems. I was reading about them at Bharat rakshak, very impressed. Definately the finest amonngst us work in DRDO missile dept both in calibar as well as duty bound.
RE:RE:Morons
by Bhola on Dec 19, 2007 06:31 PM Permalink
Standard Missile is the world's choice for air defense and theater ballistic missile defense. For 50 years, Standard Missile technology has evolved to keep pace with the threat and grow into new missions. Standard was developed as a replacement for the Terrier, Talos and Tartar surface-to-air missiles.
SM-1 entered production in 1967 and remains in operation with many international navies. Raytheon has assumed support of SM-1 and is leading a team of companies to provide users around the globe with access to spares and repair services.
SM-2's primary role is to provide area defense against enemy aircraft and anti-ship cruise missiles. SM-2 is deployed in several configurations, ranging from SM-2 Block IIIA to SM-2 Block IV Extended Range.
RE:Morons
by Bhola on Dec 19, 2007 06:36 PM Permalink
JAPAN yesterday said it had successfully shot down a ballistic missile over the Pacific as part of joint efforts with the United States to erect a shield against possible attacks from North Korea.
Japan tested the US-developed Standard Missile 3 interceptor from a warship in waters off Hawaii 160 km above the earth surface.
RE:STILL TESTING ?
by vikas godage on Dec 19, 2007 06:03 PM Permalink
When the testing will be completed , the technoogy and this product will be outdated and Western countries wud have far advance missiles.........hahahahhaha.........Salute to our policy makers
RE:RE:RE:RE:STILL TESTING ?
by Major Sassy on Dec 19, 2007 06:10 PM Permalink
I know you are dumb but that dumb? Patriot missiles are no where in the class as Akash
RE:RE:STILL TESTING ?
by BhejaFry on Dec 19, 2007 06:07 PM Permalink
incremental refinement is possible in cars, but missiles are very costly, so they cant manufacture them in large scale unless they are sure their technology would last at least for a decade. besides car manufacturers have profit in mind, so even if they know that their car is not perfect ,they would still bring it into market just for the sake of earning money. cant do that with missiles,bcos its not a profit making business.
RE:STILL TESTING ?
by BhejaFry on Dec 19, 2007 06:04 PM Permalink
Hitting an object dropped mid air is no way of testing it. it should be tested on prithvi and aircraft flying at 3 mach plus speed. for that we will need to sacrifice a few old planes like MIG's , of course the pilot can bail out before its hit! that will prove how effective it is.
Such rigorous testing is neccessary if in future its supposed to protect us against F-16's , eurofighter , raptor , F-118 etc
RE:RE:RE:STILL TESTING ?
by BhejaFry on Dec 19, 2007 06:12 PM Permalink
and MIRAGE 2000 too.
Do u think americans , russians, french test their surface to air missiles by hitting objects dropped mid air , silly ? they are willing to spend more and sacrifice their planes, or they hit an incoming missile.only then testing makes sense.
because in testing u need to recreate a war like scenario ( as realistic as possible) and check to see if ur missile works in such cases
RE:STILL TESTING ?
by BhejaFry on Dec 19, 2007 06:17 PM Permalink
at least they should try to shoot down a few light combat aircrafts! ( which they easily can,given how obsolete the LCA are).
Or if thats too much then at least test it on Advanced light helicopter.
test it on anything that can move at high speed and not a freefalling object dropped mid air.
RE:RE:RE:RE:STILL TESTING ?
by BhejaFry on Dec 19, 2007 06:13 PM Permalink
otherwise in actual war the missile will be capable of hitting only objects dropped mid air by enemy aircraft.
RE:RE:RE:STILL TESTING ?
by Major Sassy on Dec 19, 2007 06:11 PM Permalink
:-) Mig 31??? No Mig 31 are flown anywhere in the world; its a test aircraft.
Great Show!!! You make us proud as Indians and further reassure us that dependance on developed countries are not indispensable for our defence strategy unlike Pakistan. Vande mataram!!
RE:Vande Mataram
by Major Sassy on Dec 19, 2007 05:54 PM Permalink
Actually we are reinventing what our forefathers used during Mahabharat 5000 years back :-P
There are no missile in class of Akash at the moment
RE:Akash missile test-fired
by Divakar Singh on Dec 19, 2007 05:54 PM Permalink
Dear, please stop applying the ideas acquired by reading sci-fi novels. India is far behind developed countries in terms of technology. Only once we develop sufficient arms to counter chinese technology, we can start thinking in the direction of other scientific ventures. Chandrayan is a good step in this direction, and I think we will some day make it to other sophisticated areas as pointed out by you. For now it is just the matter of getting our priorities right for the time being.
RE:Akash missile test-fired
by rasvanthi on Dec 19, 2007 06:05 PM Permalink
If you want to feel anti-gravity go in a helicopter. Moreover there is no use of anti-gravity or inertia canceller. My request to scientits is - Please develop wireless electricity from air just like thunderlightning.. it is very painful when my mobile battery goes down during important call and i dont want to carry the charger all time or do charging everyday from a wall socket.
RE:RE:Akash missile test-fired
by drunken monk on Dec 19, 2007 06:08 PM Permalink
rasvanthi
Go to You tube type "Alien engineering" watch part 1 to part 10, you will know why inertia cancellor is necessary and important and worm hole. I am sure this is sci-fi but still its not far from us.
RE:Akash missile test-fired
by bahmophet on Dec 19, 2007 05:48 PM Permalink
u r a caasandra ? read some encyclopaedia? picked up some words without knowing the meaning or context?
RE:Akash missile test-fired
by drunken monk on Dec 19, 2007 06:04 PM Permalink
atleast i picked up something from encyclopedia knowing what it is, which u are not even aware of terminologies like this bistard. This is for BAHMOPHET
