RE:modi
by Mahesh D. on Dec 14, 2007 02:46 PM Permalink
Where r u bringing Modi here in Mumbai madam. He is in Gujarat and even he is on Seat, he is no concerned about this misshap in Mumbai. The Other people in Mumbvai are responsible for that. Let the report came first.
RE:modi
by amit rajnikant shah on Dec 14, 2007 03:01 PM Permalink
Abe Ae RAKHI BHAD__ do ur business during night and dont dare to talks for Hindu Cast
I am sure there must be complaints lodged for renovation. Maharastra government eating peoples money and dont do anything. Result 5 peoples death. chee! shame.
RE:5 killed as building collapses in Mumbai
by Sheetal Kaur on Dec 14, 2007 06:09 PM Permalink
This clearly shows that the laws created to protect and avoid this kind of mishaps are not being implemented. the regulations of building and building control are not being followed. Contractors work is of third rate, with corners cut every where to make maximum profit, The supervisors are not competent people perhaps with zero knowledge of building trade. The inspectors are not qualified to to inspect building works. Work is being carried out with out proper drawings and plans. Surveyors are not following the calculations. Load bearing structure is being interfered with. Just imagine what would have happened if the building was occupied by families. Who would be held responsible then and Now. It seems the the saying "LAW IS AN ASS" applies to India best
RE:5 killed as building collapses in Mumbai
by Sheetal Kaur on Dec 14, 2007 08:42 PM Permalink
No i am not a Hindu, nor I condemn Hinduism,Nither i am born in Delhi after 1984. secondly what has Hinduism or any other religion got to do with all this.
RE:raakhisawant@rediffmail.com
by Sheetal Kaur on Dec 14, 2007 06:20 PM Permalink
It all boils down to lack of education and implementation of law. It should be like in the west, drawings are deposited with local council. any alteration must be reported to the council,failing to do so carries a hefty fine. Both for owner and the contractor. If a place is bought and the surveyed finds that it has been altered then a structural engineer must be employed to check the safety and document any alterations made. "Costs recovered from previous owner" Any building erected with out permission is pulled down regardless of how much it costs to the owner. there may be drawings but if they are not deposited and approved by the council the the structure is regarded as illegal. The safety law is strict still mishaps happen and are investigated thoroughly. If the accident is not reported to the health and safety council then that is a separate case to be answered. There is no escape.
RE:Re: Details of Building
by Sheetal Kaur on Dec 14, 2007 08:44 PM Permalink
Make-shift building or otherwise it should have followed all the rules and regulation, after all it was to be occupied by families and not pigeons.
