snajay's release is not proper, since he was matured enough to understand the prons and corns of the situation , in this case if sanjay can be set free, why do other offender in this case be punished and put behind the bar, they too should be let off as they were much young in comparision with sanjay (Ignorance is not excusable in Law), Let Sanjay feel the pain and seperation the victims family underwent whey they had to part their beloved ones. Supreme Court decision is not vice, why do criminal be scotfree. Sanjay dutt alongwith all other inmates should not be allowed any bail for such a cruel act.
When you know, the accused is not a kind of human who's so called stranger and any one to be given a chance to be "improved man" you will agree to the decision of honourable Supreme court that Sanjay Dutt out of the jail on bail.Thank you for your wishful thinking....
thanks to stupid film makers ,kabhi black kabhi white kabhi blue sare color ke ladki ke saath stupid dance kar ke sina tanke ghum raha hai eka criminal.chalo apne india main sabu chalta hai. aur uske fan bi hain,cant believe.
Its very shameful and disgusting that even after Government spending crores of rupees for investigation by appointing a efficient and top advocate as public prosecutor and MR.Kode who relentlessly verified the facts before giving judgement that Sanjay is released. The efforts and pain taken by Police,CBI,Public Prosecutor and Judges may have gone vain. Maharastrian Govermnet spent more than what producers have invested in Sanjay.
RE:Shameful,
by stone cold on Aug 23, 2007 05:08 AM Permalink
Abey Madrasi Ravi Kumar.....stop bullshiting and go watch some Rajnikanth movie....all this is not ur cup of tea
New SC chief judge appointed by congress govt seems to be very merciful, sympathetic, lenient towards congress and their allied parties criminals. sanjay dutt gets bail, soren gets clean chit, whats next verdict? rebuild babri?
RE:New judge seems very forgeving
by desai on Aug 23, 2007 04:25 AM Permalink
Yes we should, it was an act of cowardice that brought shame on the secular hindu culture thats always existed here.
RE:New judge seems very forgeving
by ajesh chawla on Aug 22, 2007 10:48 PM Permalink
Dear Correct yourself. He was appointed in 2000 by BJP Govt and became chief in SC only by being senior to every Judge, not by being Dalit alone as such. He has got no beifit of reservation as generally others get. Sorry if it pains you.
RE:Why is the judgement not handed over?
by ajesh chawla on Aug 22, 2007 10:38 PM Permalink
It is now being written in 6000 pages after the announcement of the punishment first. why was not it vice-versa ?
RE:Why is the judgement not handed over?
by stone cold on Aug 23, 2007 05:24 AM Permalink
Your father was born before you, can it be vise-versa....get ur answer u filthy shit
Sir, Perhaps Kapil Sibal, P.R.Dasmunsi and Kabir Bedi should shed light on why on March 12, 1993, when the bomb blast occurred, Sanjay Dutt did not inform Commissioner of Police Samra, of the nine AK56s, and eighty hand grenades, which were delivered to him on January 16th, 1993, by Abu Salem, Baba Chauhan, Hanif Kadawala and Sameer Hingora?
This would have been of a great help in the detection of the conspirators, of the bomb blasts, at the earliest.
Why on April 14th, 1993, Sanjay denied all involvement, yet, asked his friend Yusuf Nulwala, to go to Ajanta, Sunil Dutt%u2019s bungalow, locate the AK-56, which he had finally kept and destroy it, and a pistol, which was, also, there. How Nulwalla, passed the security cordon at Ajanta, with the weapons, without Sunil Dutt%u2019s knowledge?
And finally, why Baba Chauhan, Hanif Kadawala, Sameer Hingora, and Zaibunnisa Kazi, who received the weapons, for a few hours only, were convicted under TADA, yet the lucky Sanjay Dutt, who kept the AL-56, two magazines, 250 rounds of ammunition, and a pistol, for three months till detected, has only been convicted under the Arms Act? From,
