Jo deal nahin karne ke liye itna mara mari kar rahe ho, wo deal kill ho jaye ga bolke itna dukh kyon?
If one day deal will be killed for some reason, let it be!!! By that time let the Indian scholars get some knowledge and expertises. Why you people are killing the deal without get start?
I dont see any logic of resentment of those opposing as they are trying to abort an unborn baby thinking that one day this baby will be died if we can not feed him/her!
Times have changed, and emphasize the many benefits that will accrue to India if it were to join with the United States in a quasi-alliance relationship. The Vajpayee government invented the term "natural alliance" which has been adopted by Prime Minister Singh's government, and American officials
It is certainly fault on the part of Ambassador to talk in loose fashion and that too he knows fully well that he is talking to a media person. People in high offices, like ambassador should not be giving comments likes this. On the other hand, the media wallas are equally bad and their main intention is to bring controversy everytime so that their news can be read. This is nothing but cheap publicity and this thamasha goes on in every media, whether it is TV, Radio, News Paper or Internet. This editor calls that ambassador is his best friend and he has highest respect for him. Now this is what is done to his best friend, nothing but to expose the ambassadar to throw him out of his job. Finally, Indian parliament dance to the tune of communists whose interest is not India and these guys are never to be trusted. Bring them to power in central government and make a communist as PM, I bet, every Indian defence secrets will be sold to China and these guys will be happy to be gulam for Chineese. Long time back they have already declared that their chairman is Chinese president. Shameless communists. When will India throw these fellows in gutter.
RE:News editors want juicy news and reaction!
by subhasis ray on Aug 21, 2007 06:26 PM Permalink
no no...if atall any commie becomes the PM he will precisely do wht MMS or Vajpayee or for tht matter any PM does...country's foreign policy dont change with govt...foreign policy is made keeping in mind the next 40yrs...this is the reason y commies dont want to hold office at centre bcos they know they then will not b able to follow thr ideology since then history will mark them traitor
RE:Shame
by sakar panch on Aug 21, 2007 06:15 PM Permalink
what shame. I think Aziz and rediff are correct. If you make a statement stand by it and take responsibility. This off record, background etc are not correct at this level. Ambasodor has convereted a conversation as "off the record conversation" if it were understood that the conversation was indeed "off the record" at the outset then let rediff apologise or let the ambasador sue rediff. This selective acceptance of converstation is not acceptable.
Kyon Haniffa ji, Sen saab ko puchhi thi kya yeh off the record nahin hai bolke interview mein? Malicious intention to jaroor hai jaisa lagta hai. Media bale to kisiko fasane ke liye mauka hi dhundte rahte ho. pata nahin kaun sa country ka interest pe kaam kar rahe ho. Why dont you put your independant prospective if Mr. sen has said something wrong? Can you, Please!!!
RE:Clarifications
by sanjai on Aug 21, 2007 06:11 PM Permalink
Dont worry, Mr Sen! Election is in. Where ever you will stand you will win and become the MP to give fittest reply to these headless chickens!!!
Pakistan has pleaded with China at the highest level not to let it down in the nuclear balance with India, Beijing is apparently working out a nuclear deal with Islamabad, in case the Indo-US nuclear agreement is okayed by the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG).
"U.S. State Department Sean McCormack said late Wednesday that any weapons test by New Delhi would kill the deal". Further, India will have to abide by the principles laid down by the US. What does that mean? Should we look at crippling Pakistan knotting with china or should we SURRENDER to US because we do not have the balls to stand with Russia Alone?
RE:Bend and be Gone
by roopesh raghavan on Aug 21, 2007 06:13 PM Permalink
New Delhi led Washington to believe that it would send troops to Iraq, but after a loud cry was heard from the Doubters and the Hostiles, the Vajpayee government backed off. Conversely, there are Indian expectations regarding American policy (notably, support for a UN seat and membership in the nuclear club). How America responds to these Indian demands will shape the balance of influence among these four schools. Burying US-Indian differences under labels ("natural allies" being one of them), does injustice to the prospect of two democratic states discussing their real differences and their real shared interests, and forging a relationship that is both durable and mutually beneficial.
RE:Bend and be Gone
by Ratnakar Mankad on Aug 21, 2007 06:05 PM Permalink
The main point of our lack of resources to run our energy plans without international supplies of uranium is being lost in the egoistic stance about US restrictions on India.
US will not be able to enforce any of its perceived nonproliferation measures if Pakistan goes ahead with new any nuclear weapons plans in its own security interests. Keeping this in mind, we need to ensure supplies of nuclear fuel for our reactors which are already under IAEA safeguards.
RE:Bend and be Gone
by sanjai on Aug 21, 2007 06:07 PM Permalink
Jo deal nahin karne ke liye itna mara mari kar rahe ho, wo deal kill ho jaye ga bolke itna dukh kyon?
If one day deal will be killed for some reason, let it be!!! By that time let the Indian scholars get some knowledge and expertises. Why you people are killing the deal without get start?
I dont see any logic of resentment of those opposing as they are trying to abort an unborn baby thinking that one day this baby will be died if we can not feed him/her!
