Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 200 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Do we need the comrades?
by DYS DYS on Aug 22, 2007 05:02 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

I never knew so much wrath is there in India against these confused breed. Both China and Russia have gone capitalist way. What will happen to this motherless child? By nature, they are terrorists and this party need be banned for its activities just for its Singur and Nandigram actions leave alone its activities during pre-independence era. They have not contributed anything for our country except bringing refugees from East Pakistan (currently Bangladesh) for votes and thereby crashing the economy of WB. Power cut, rampant corruption etc are their symbols; they form 'local committee' in every area of WB - for what, who finances them? They are evil to our society.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:RE:Do we need the comrades?
by Bhaumik on Oct 09, 2007 02:19 AM  Permalink
DYS DYS, if your pet ideology and pet political party can survive after the fall of Naziz and fascists, and their remnants in on the fringes of Europe, why not Communists.

I do not support or belong to communist ideology. But I find they are better patriots than BJP or other Sectarian parties who are so intolerant of diversity, and pure nationhood (i.e nationhood not linked to religion). BJP wants India to be like those intolerant Muslim nations, where religious identity is synonymous with citizen hood.

It is to the credit of Communists that they have evolved into social democrats engaging parliament democracy in Europe, AND IN INDIA, AND ELSEWHERE. THAT IS WHY THEY SURVIVED.

But your pet ideolgy is so inherently evil, sectarian, and violence-prone, that it can never evolve into anything human. It is only hatred for fellow human beings who are different from you that gets your ideology its adherents.



   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Do we need the comrades?
by kotireddy ravi on Aug 22, 2007 06:47 PM  Permalink
DO the communists really believe in communism
they also believe in partisan attitude towards
farmers and at sacrifices
1) when people died at nandigram they did not regret it in clear terms and they did not abandon the idea of giving land to TATAs by forcibly taking from the poor farmers
2)They did not give any compensation so farhere but they made it big hue and cry and demanded immediate compensation in AP,even their adoring GOD CBNaidu did not give any compensation in Bashherbagh and moreover he described the dead in basheerbagh as anti-national and traitors-do marxism define these incidents separately ?is there any difference in loosing lives in WB and in AP? is the blood of people died in AP and those died in WB differ/or the people died in WB(farmers) are karodpathees?these marxists are total mosalists(in telugu-cheaters),blackmailers and opportunistic fellows with trojan horses policies,in the terms of their policies and philosophies they term UPA as anti-people and also they term UNPA but they play with them
supporting the same anti-people for sometime and other UNPA(hereafter) making people and their marxist cadre as fools( in the NTR regime
they lost their entire CPIM cadre to TDP with head that of NTR and body with RED shirt due to their beg,borrow and steal policy attitude towards our big parties)
3)They give marxist education only on peripherals so that the cadre should not learn marxism in real terms
we do not need these mosalists

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Marxism is an out of date idiology!!
by DEV ASHISH on Aug 22, 2007 04:43 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

This particular idiology belongs to lazy people who wants to distribute what other's have earned.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
jago india jago
by sunidhi bansal on Aug 22, 2007 04:06 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

THE GREAT BETRAYAL

Whole world today acknowledges India as an emerging super power. We have scaled amazing heights in the field of Information Technology, Space and Biotech Industrialization, which have set precedence's for economies of other developing countries. The GDP, fiscal deficit, growth rate and to top it all financial stability has proved to the world the emergence of a new vibrant India. The strength of our democracy is a guideline for the world today and the rate at which we are growing making in roads into vast variety of vistas reflects our strengths, capabilities and the will to rise. During the last sixty years; Indian spirits have been on the rise scaling new heights. Suddenly we have emerged at the global horizon like sun. With such rapid growth; naturally we need to update infrastructure and in particular more clean power to spread the benefits to common man by virtue of access to new technologies. The time India got Independence to now; need for power generation has increased manifold. We did set up many power projects in different parts of the country but the demand increased beyond projections by virtue of a nation's hard working, committed populace. Meanwhile the highly developed nations America, Russia, France, Germany, Japan; went on with the help of sensitive technologies and nuclear power production gained more advancement in every sphere. China was also not far behind in all this. The world economic forums acknowledged the emergence of BRIC %u20

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:jago india jago
by sibby mathews on Aug 22, 2007 05:20 PM  Permalink
If you take into account the fact that India is the second largest nation on earth and do a detailed and analytical comparison with other countries in various fields of human endeavour, you will see that India is still very much one of the most underperforming nations (and getting no better; for illustration, look carefully at China's record in various fields) in the world.

For too long, we have managed to make ourselves almost inconspicuous among the various large countries of the world despite being home to about one sixth of humanity !! And this fact should lend a big measure of perspective and moderation in our assessment of where we really stand. Sixty years of independence ought to have yielded much, much more in terms of nation building than has actually been managed. And 15 years of the so called 'liberalisation' and 'market reforms' have brought real development only to the already rich or a miniscule percentage of the upper middle class. This is not merely a 'leftist stereotyped vision' as widely generalised by commoners who are too innocent to understand the intricacies. Every detailed and comparative survey on the economy using tools such as the 'State of the Indian economy' report, reports of the 'Centre for monitoring of the Indian economy', 'Human development index' reports by the UN, other illuminating reports that are available in documents like the Census records, etc. will show that much of the Indian media has only been misleading the commoners.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Congress must take on elections now!
by Arpit Arora on Aug 22, 2007 03:44 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Congress must go in for the kill now!
I am pretty sure they will get full majority this time, because everybody knows who (Left) is hindering the growth path of the country. and BJP's Position is itself weakened because of sad polls in Gujarat & UP. And even Shiv Sena is not backing BJP properly (as seen in Presidential Polls).
I definitely think we can now have a full majority for a single political party which is being sought for all these years!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Congress must take on elections now!
by peter justin on Aug 22, 2007 03:57 PM  Permalink
To hell with the left they are more loyal to Mao then Mao's own country men.All over the world the left is a spent force even in the land of Karl Marx his saying has become a standing joke.It is high time the Indian masses realized this and give Marxisim a fitting funeral.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Congress must take on elections now!
by sibby mathews on Aug 22, 2007 05:26 PM  Permalink
'The left is a spent force even in the land of Karl Marx his saying has become a standing joke' !

Mr. Justin, can you say which is Karl Marx's land ?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Congress must take on elections now!
by MiddleClass Indian on Aug 22, 2007 05:37 PM  Permalink
There will still be a coalition of Congress - Left (Some other parties)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Why don't the Left & the opposition parties spell out their specific points against the deal?
by Madhusudhan N.R. on Aug 22, 2007 02:56 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

I don't really care for the UPA and am not bothered if this govt survives or not. Having said that, why are the opponents to the deal not specifying their exact reservations on it? Apart from saying India would be selling out to the US and can never be sovereign... which by itself makes little sense. How are we better off today? Can we test a nuclear device and get away with it? No. if we sign the deal, get their assistance for a couple of years and then some new govt (or the same one) tests a N device, what then? I don't see any difference, except that in the latter case we would have benefitted for a couple of years with advance tech transfer, uranium supplies, hopefully more power availability. Our scientists, if the govt were smart, would find a way to use the astounding amount of thorium reserves we have, to work around the lack of uranium supplies....what is specifically hurting the lefts in this??? I can only seee their visceral hatred of the US and nothing else. The NDA and the rest have just found something to create a furore in the parliament, nothing else. What a bunch of headless chicken, indeed. Mr. Sen is absolutely right.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Why don't the Left & the opposition parties spell out their specific points against the deal?
by Sahadevan KK on Aug 22, 2007 03:41 PM  Permalink
communalism...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Why don't the Left & the opposition parties spell out their specific points against the deal?
by savior on Aug 22, 2007 04:32 PM  Permalink
communalism in nuclear deal?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
who exactly are these Left ?
by Gumpy on Aug 22, 2007 02:55 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Friends, who are these left that are opposing the Nuke deal - lets get to some history about them...
1. these left are the same people who had got several Indian freedom fighter arrested during World War 2, 1945-46, at Soviet Russia's instance.
2. these Left are the very same people who has taken China's side when 1962 Indo-Chinese war broke out. They even raised fund for Chinese soldiers in India.
3. They had called respected freedom fighter Netaji Subhas Bose "DOG."
4. Today they want to stop the Nuke deal the instance of China's Communist party.
Can we Indians trust these very same Left with India's national interest? Decide for yourself, but only after carefully going thru Left%u2019s history.



    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:who exactly are these Left ?
by MiddleClass Indian on Aug 22, 2007 05:33 PM  Permalink
No. Left are not opposing the deal just because it is the US and they are communists. Neither is the BJP. Wonder why this Govt. does not publish the 123 Agreement on a proper website for public opinion! May be there is something in there... BTW, US never to be trusted. Today they are with you and tomorrow they will ditch you for Pakistan. They have done that since time immemorial. They go where the money is. Money (oil) in Iraq, they go after it. Money (oil) in Iran, they go after it. Money in nuke energy in India, they will come for it. Only without invading. Think... Cannot India build enough energy through conventional resources? It can. All it requires is a political will to do it and zero corruption.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 200 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Write a message