Japan has expressed concern on India not signing NPT. The reason for that has to do with the arbitrary cut off date in the treaty, since India had formally declared its intent in 1964. Modern Indian state has evolved out of tenuous hold of civil law introduced by few enlightened Britishers. Unlike Japan which had to surrender after its Imperial transgressions and opted to live within the security architecture provided to it; Indian state chose to keep Communism and Neo-Imperialism at bay while also desisting the onslaughts of those aspiring for a theocratic state. The quality and dimensional aspects of Indian legal structure needs to be taken into consideration in judging whether the Indian case merits favourable recognition. Further, on the same valid grounds,since the arbitrary cut off date in NPT is not founded on any sound legal principle; there is a just case for India to be included as a have memember in NPT.
The person who reported abuse was obviously hurt, the intended effect was lost. The fault, as the communication adage goes, always lies with the communicator, therefor offer my sincere apology.
Japan understood India's need for using nuclear power to meet its energy deficit!!! They know that no other greener ways (solar, wind, tidal etc) won't produce that much energy reliably to meet the demand!!! We ask and hope that all people who are in the NSG will have to help India to grow side by side to get more energy for the increasing demand!!!
