I read Mr. Prem Paniker's article; why such type of happenings only in Indian Cricket? finally, one day match / 3 day match / test match between BCCI Vs. Men in Blue ended in draw at Mumbai Taj Mahal Stadium???
The body sat yesterday was toothless and meeting was useless.6 useless people discussed that how to save a useless captain .All the body member and captain should be fired .
Learned people read and understand. Illiterates don't read because they can't. Sensitive people empathise and appreciate, literate or otherwise.
Motivated people work towards a goal. But what the heck! Why is everyone fuming at the drama unfolding now? What did you expect? Jokers will dictate and we'll remain suckers.
The Review Committee has resolved the dispute in a typical Indian manner, where the main issue remains untouched and the parties involved are seen shaking hands. Recently, another set of wise men resolved a similar dispute between Advani and Khurana in the same manner.
The main issue is; and even John Wright echoed this: that the players in the team are not selected on merit. Chappel simply added that this applies even to the Captain.
Take the case of Sachin Tendulkar. The guy has not touched a cricket bat in months, and yet he found himself into the BCCI team, before he actually started net practice. The guy has a proven record of failures in hours of crisis. Should we not ask him to prove his match fitness before considering him for a place in the national team?
With the captain himself coming from a 'reserved quota', no one can question the inclusion of Tendulkars and Harbhajans.
The Review Committee has resolved the dispute in a typical Indian manner, where the main issue remains untouched and the parties involved are seen shaking hands. Recently, another set of wise men resolved a similar dispute between Advani and Khurana in the same manner.
The main issue is; and even John Wright echoed this: that the players in the team are not selected on merit. Chappel simply added that this applies even to the Captain.
Take the case of Sachin Tendulkar. The guy has not touched a cricket bat in months, and yet he found himself into the BCCI team, before he actually started net practice. The guy has a proven record of failures in hours of crisis. Should we not ask him to prove his match fitness before considering him for a place in the national team?
With the captain himself coming from a 'reserved quota', no one can question the inclusion of Tendulkars and Harbhajans.
dear indians i can't agree what happned in BCCI meeting any way ball comes to people court dont worry wait srilanka and south africa series ...ganguly again failed..must remeber ganguly &co we indian peoples really we know what we can do for u as well as ur company ...u .. r loughing ...pls perform well .and behave well .otherwise .go.we indian peoples will loughing one fine day okey.remeber u r maharaja for ur family not for india.
tell ur boys play for country not for money and women and otherthings we are watching your activities on next matches... (because nearly 2 crore young indians are waiting for the slots in indian team..here lot of sewag's sachin's pathans kapildev's gavaskar's are there but except selfish ganguly)these peoples can bowl bat and good fielders also pls give chance these two crores indians...
We all miss you here, Mr Panicker. You hit the nail on the head as always. I am not sure what keeps Chappel from resigning - maybe he hopes the next two series will open the eyes of the selectors :).
This whole fracas has served Ganguly well, if the focus hadn't shifted to "scheming and feigning", it may well have remained on performance and he might have lost out on the indian cap now itself.
I wouldn't like to go into the enquiry whether who
was wrong or right, Ganguly or Chappell? Proving anything of this question would be shame to Indian Cricket and to Indian fan.
Ganguly is an Indian icon with a record of most successful Indian captain ever. He has shown that how powerful he was in the past and currently. So, if he quits the game, he should be equally rewarded. Chappell is a man who has been given precedence over INDIAN GREATS to coach Inidian team. He has been rated highly technocrat coach. He has been appointed assuming that he 'll take Indian Cricket to a great height with his style of fuctioning, as he pointed bravely not to the Indian Captain but the weak structure of Inidian Board. And he is Handsomly paid.
The decision the Committe took after hearing Ganguly and Chappell points towards them only. Media, Chappell and Ganguly has given enough feedback to the fans what is going on Indian Cricket. And fan understand two things very clearly, Indian Politics and Cricket.
Many questions have been left unanswered by the committee,one is, whether there is any personal loss to the six wise men if they take any harsh decision for benefit of Indian Cricket ?
