I watched last 2 indian idols. Some how today I am disappointed too much. Both the time I thought lesser deserving candidates won. This year I thought Amit, Emon, Deepali, Pooja, Abhishek were much better in both singing and performing than the winner.
Last year too Karunya and Amey much better in all ways than the ultimate winner. Though I did not watch the 1st one, my friends told me that Amit shna was better than the winner.
'Baar baar laggaataar' voting is really dangerous. That leads to NOTHING. It looks like pattern of deciding the idol should change, if viewers need to retain the interest. Judges should have substancial say in the decision. That will lend credibility and serenity. DK
RE:Was he deserving ??
by on on Sep 28, 2007 10:20 PM Permalink
We indians always choose loosers to be winners...Prasanth tamang was a good singer but not the top 10 quality. He should never have been in the final 10 picks. This guys sucks big time. Amit & Emon were the best i wud think...
RE:RE:Was he deserving ??
by on on Sep 28, 2007 10:25 PM Permalink
well Mr. Vinod, i did vote for Amit cause he was the best among the two. But who can tell some brainless useless fellow indians..who think living in the same state , city wud mean he is the best...people of india on the whole r stupid..excluding a few like me..who put the talent first..
tell me one thing , if u had a bro or sis performing in indian idol and they may be not then best singer like other participant, to whom u would hv voted??
RE:Was he deserving ??
by on on Sep 28, 2007 10:51 PM Permalink
i wud hav voted for the best talent..period No vote for brother or sister if they don't deserve it.
