RE:Good Bye
by Nirman on Mar 31, 2007 10:08 AM Permalink
I rate Kumble better than Warne. out of 10 Kumble gets 8 and warne 7.9 . Reason being warne always had Mcgrath and company for support. Kumble didnot have any. during the last 17 years Australia have won so many matches and so warne got chance to bowl in 2 innings of every match. As far as india is concerned ,w e have won hardly so naturally kumble got less chance to bowl than warne and too not so friendly conditions as his partners were no where near him
RE:Good Bye
by saurabh sheth on Mar 31, 2007 10:14 AM Permalink
Warne is better. Kumble needs favourable wickets to pick wicket whereas Warne and Murali can pick wickets on any wicket anywhere in the world
RE:Good Bye
by Nirman on Mar 31, 2007 10:21 AM Permalink
Warne had so many to help him out. Murali is also in same category as kumble. I rate Murali above both . but he is always in controversy for his action. All said and done it was great fun to watch these 3 masters in action. There bowling was as exciting as batting of LAra/ponting or dashers like Jayasurya/shewag or Afridi.
RE:RE:Good Bye
by saurabh sheth on Mar 31, 2007 10:22 AM Permalink
No excuses friend. Both are better than Kumble. But Kumble's commitment is appreciable...
