I rate Kumble better than Warne. out of 10 Kumble gets 8 and warne 7.9 . Reason being warne always had Mcgrath and company for support. Kumble didnot have any. during the last 17 years Australia have won so many matches and so warne got chance to bowl in 2 innings of every match. As far as india is concerned ,w e have won hardly so naturally kumble got less chance to bowl than warne and too not so friendly conditions as his partners were no where near him
RE:KUMBLE GREATEST
by sunil coth on Mar 31, 2007 10:41 AM Permalink
ur right Nirman...Kumble is better than warne....Australia is capable of make score which automaticaly put pressure on opp side..but india kumble always give best performance even low score match....
RE:KUMBLE GREATEST
by Rehan Khan on Mar 31, 2007 10:18 AM Permalink
But sir Warne was most of the time match winner and not Kumble if you don't realise update stats of warne 1996,1999 World cup semi final
RE:KUMBLE GREATEST
by saurabh sheth on Mar 31, 2007 10:20 AM Permalink
Murali and Warne are far superior bowlers than Kumble. They can pick wickets on any wicket. Kumble needs favourable wicket to succeed
