Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Worst Selector India ever Had
by ZULFI HAR on Mar 29, 2007 03:35 AM   Permalink | Hide replies

Vishy..Please dont show your face.. WE know how you gave chances and chances to Kannada players.. Do you think Ganesh,Surjit,Bhartawaraj,joshi deserve to be the team..Do you know bcos of U many tamil nadu players Sharath,senthilnathan and even Robinshigh were sidelined..Still supporting Rahaul bcos he is from your home town..

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:Worst Selector India ever Had
by prashanth prashanth on Mar 29, 2007 06:38 AM   Permalink
think properly dude. you cant think anything about Captain. Vishy says truth. I think Karnataka Players are best to win the world cup.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:[object MouseEvent]
by Maha Stud on Mar 29, 2007 11:17 AM   Permalink
oh yeah !!

~~~ then it musta been with women cric ...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Worst Selector India ever Had
by Girish Bangalore on Mar 29, 2007 04:33 AM   Permalink
Get your facts right buddy.. Robin was not sidelined when Vishy was there,and here are the records.

Senthilnathan

http://content-usa.cricinfo.com/ci/content/player/33898.html

Total first class match played 37, 2 centuries. He did not play enough first class matches for even TN

Sharath - This is what Cricinfo had to say about him.

Despite being one of the most consistent performers on the domestic circuit, Sridharan Sharath couldn't step up to the international stage. He was unlucky that his prime coincided with a period when India's middle order - with the likes of Sachin Tendulkar, Rahul Dravid, Sourav Ganguly and VVS Laxman - was packed with immense talent. Sharath didn't possess an immaculate technique, was disproportionately built - with clumps jutting out at the waist - and made batting look like hard work. In many ways he was Indian domestic cricket's Arjuna Ranatunga - the man for a crisis, the cool head under pressure, the hardworking artisan in a side packed with artists. For 15 seasons since 1992, he had amassed 8390 runs at an average close to 52. He became the only Tamil Nadu player to play 100 Ranji Trophy games and celebrated the moment with a century against Saurashtra in December 2007. He announced his retirement a month later.

Around the time Vishy was the chariman, Karnataka had won 3 Ranji finals in 4 years. So can you ignore a players from a champion team? or just not select them b'cos the world things he is biased? Anyways, those that do not perform will not stay long.


1998-99       Karnataka       Madhya Pradesh       Statistics
1997-98       Karnataka       Uttar Pradesh       Statistics
1996-97       Mumbai       Delhi       Statistics
1995-96       Karnataka       Tamil Nadu       

Keep your regionalism out and think of the nation.



   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:Worst Selector India ever Had
by deepak kotnis on Mar 29, 2007 06:48 AM   Permalink
December 2007 is yet to come, so r u expecting a century from Sharath against saurashtra or is it something related to the bookies.....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Worst Selector India ever Had
by Maha Stud on Mar 29, 2007 11:17 AM   Permalink
gud one deepak .....!!

hez a blind assholes .... from karnataka

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Worst Selector India ever Had
by Javed MEandDad on Mar 29, 2007 04:48 AM   Permalink
tehn how come MUmBAI which wins every alternate yr doesnt have 6 players in the team at any point of time....

amd plyers like doodda ganesh,davidjohnson sujit somasunder were all crap

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:Worst Selector India ever Had
by Girish Bangalore on Mar 29, 2007 05:00 AM   Permalink
Whether all Ranji winning teams should have "x" number of players is not my point. I do not follow mumbai cricket. If there are good players who can play for India and have been ignored then it is right for them to knock on the door. How many mumbai players we have in the team now, I can count 3 Sachin, Agarkar, Zaheer

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Worst Selector India ever Had
by on Mar 29, 2007 05:46 AM   Permalink
Yes Girish is right, remember when Vishy was the chairman we had Azhar as the captain.
So captain agreed for that , players are selected only when captian and selection committee agrees.



   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
'Batsmen let Dravid down'