Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
More of Ganguli
by Sunita Chatterjee on Mar 25, 2007 08:30 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

more and other players from more's village were getting so pissed off at ganguli's success in taking the indian team ahead, they had to get rid of this man by hook or crook. Chapell became elected by a single extra vote from ganguli. Dravid was in such a poor form, ganguli helped him by making him the wicket keeper. And dravid and chapell were the first ones to stab him in the back.
Any one who says ganguli is not patriotic, should go to stay in Australia, or dravid's sasural in nagpur or with more who is very fond of playing table cricket.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:More of Ganguli
by neha on Mar 25, 2007 10:38 PM   Permalink
Its well aware that even the then coach John Wright too didn't agree of Dravid's wicketkeeping ,over concerns that it'll destroy his batting.Don't forget that that Dravid was already in good form even when he was doing wicketkeeping.Ganguly destroyed Tendulkar bcoz of his jealousy,thus bringing him up&down the order.Nobody backstabbed him,hegot back for his own deeds.Not to forget that the Bengalis are not the only patriotic people,so do watch out before making such comments.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:More of Ganguli
by Sunita Chatterjee on Mar 25, 2007 11:21 PM   Permalink
I see, you have not read what notorious comments some madcaps have made about ganguli and the bengalees in general. Also, I doubt if you are well aware of the cricket records. I wish ganguli had removed sachin and dravid from the team at that time itself, in that case we did not have to see today's glorious moments.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:More of Ganguli
by Ifear paceman on Mar 26, 2007 11:17 AM   Permalink
is he super selector?
Is BCCI his private property?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
'Even selectors are answerable'