Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
inconsistent ranking system!
by yellamraju sreenivasulu on Mar 16, 2007 01:45 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

Look at the 2 payers at 109 and 110 places in the long list of players.
Though both of them bowled 18 balls, player 109 has conceeded more runs than player 110, but still ranked higher. Player 109 has scored less runs than player 110, but still ranked higher.

How can you explain this?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:inconsistent ranking system!
by Guru M on Mar 16, 2007 03:44 PM   Permalink
it is not inconsistent ranking system. it is that u are not able enough to understand it. The ranmking system is based on the total points in the last column. The last column is based on all the batting, bowling, fileding, catches, stumping performance. Based on a formula, the total is arrived. The data is PERFECT. Rediff is the best.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:inconsistent ranking system!
by GURUPRASAD THONSE on Mar 16, 2007 02:18 PM   Permalink
I agree. Leave your observation aside. Just look at the player ranked 88. He neither scored runs nor bowled. Still he is ranked 88! SO you participate in a game. Do not bowl and do not bat. There is very high chance that you may still end up in top 10!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:inconsistent ranking system!
by ajit tripathy on Mar 16, 2007 03:26 PM   Permalink
mallu it is left to you to understand
nobody is going to explain to you

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:inconsistent ranking system!
by AAA on Mar 16, 2007 03:44 PM   Permalink
Both of you Idiots. It is correct. Just use your brain.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
Ponting still leads MVP table