as always, selectors think indian fans are fool. They were saying pathan will have to prove himself in this match. Is this the proof they were looking for?
RE:what this means
by Crazy Human on Feb 25, 2007 11:36 PM Permalink
i think poor india had no choice. India needed an allrounder and those selectors havent groomed or tried to groom any alternate allrounders, so they have to go with the loser Pathan. I think a better option would have been to pick a regular batsmen or a regular bowler
RE:RE:what this means
by jay de on Feb 26, 2007 06:52 AM Permalink
Please, show a little more respect when u use adjectives about our own country....INDIA is NEVER POOR and that too for not having a so called allrounder...Best regards..