RE:selection
by venkat on Feb 25, 2007 09:40 PM Permalink
spells and wickets is not imoprtant now.Now need the good perfomance the last 20 games but he is take the wickets in ranji this is not criteria because aus,sa,pak,nz,sl well and exp batsmens,it is important take the wickets in wc,but some gap there is no laxman
RE:RE:selection
by Asrar Alam on Feb 25, 2007 10:06 PM Permalink
why do u only complain about pathan? how can u MR. INDIAN forget his hat-trick against pakistan? why don't u complain about sachin. he has been a burden for india since a long time. why do u have dual standards for every thing?????????? probably u r more patriotic than us.
RE:RE:RE:selection
by Indian on Feb 25, 2007 10:16 PM Permalink
Mr. Alam, Forcing somebody into Indian team is not desirable, already we are carrying a burden in Viru , then why pathan too !!! Sachin is playing well, may not be like Sachin but still he is playing far better than some of our reputed good batsmen. Again his experience counts too. Pathan has nothing to offer right now, he is out of form as well as he is injured. So why not to take a fit and consistent player in Pawar ??? he is taking wickets quite regularly. And against one hat-rick of pathan I can put sachin's 75 centuries !! Tell me which counts more ??? lastly, Sachin is not the burden it's the Indian which has been a burden to him for quite along time. jai Hind.
RE:RE:RE:RE:selection
by priya ranjan on Feb 25, 2007 11:01 PM Permalink
Well said Mr Indian..i am totaly agree with u...I think Mr Alam bhai doesn\\\'t know A B C D about cricket..better to shut your mouth Mr Alam bhai..
RE:RE:RE:selection
by meena chandar on Feb 25, 2007 10:18 PM Permalink
I have already adviced the Pak selectors. We think alike... so Powar shud not be selected... thats our final decision