Hi guys, I think the board has taken a right stand by restricting the players to 3 companies. By this way they will be able to concentrate on their sole target and job-TO PLAY WELL CONSISTENTELY.
In the past what used to happen is the new guys who do well used to go mad by signing 10-12 companies straight away after performing in 10-12 matches as if they want to earn the bucks for their whole life in 1 year. Money's "HAVAS" is always bad. By this policy they will still earn a reasonable amount of money but this policy will also force them to perform more n more better so that they can earn that much money from 3 companies which they used to earn from 7-8 companies. This urge of continuous performance will help ultimately our team. Board must stick with this policy and should not change it in future what so ever the circumstances. The other good thing the board has done is abolishing the CONTRACT system which keeps the players on guard always becos this will going to be their sole source of income from matches.
WHATEVER, but tell me guys isn't that shame for us that our players are driven by money and not by National Pride. Look at Aussies 'The Baggy Green Cap' is enough for him to do good performance. Playing for Australia is enough for him. Alas, would that our players develop that LOVE FOR THE NATION.
RE:LOVE FOR THE NATION
by Suman Bhat on Apr 09, 2007 10:21 AM Permalink
the early exit of team from WC is b'czu of some players deliberately played the negative cricket and gifted match to bangadesh and SL .chappelll tried push the senior players from comfort zone and treated every body alike and equal. some paid marketing agents of ganguly blame chappell for pathatic performance and scream on top voice dravid is not good captain and ganguly should be appointed and sachin should retire. these ppl act like cric expert does not highlight the ganguly's contribution to defeat , the petty politcis he played with his chelas like bajji, zahir, dhoni andGanguly had big role in defeat in mathch against Bangladesh. He gifted match t o bangaldesh deliberately playing negative cricket just to humiliate dravid and to take revenge against chappell ?? but he betrayed the whole team ganguly wasted more balls than runs he scored poor fielding and poor running wkt and unwilling to take singles cost more runs to team also created pressure on batsman on other side He did not bother to try and hold an easy catch during agarka bowling , Never tried to accelerate run rate He did not tried to hold simple catch during agarkar%u2019s bowling 60 runs in 130 balls how it can help a team cause?? Ganguly had one stage for having batted through nearly 11 overs to make a mere 7 runs. Yuvraj Scored 47 runs in 10 overs India Scored 191 in 50 overs Ganguly Scored 66 runs in 21 overs wasted more balls than runs he scored., Yuvraj Scored 47 runs in 10 overs Rest of team scored 50 in 19 overs Against burmada Ganguly scored 89 in 114 balls wasted 25 balls that is around 4.6 runs per over... compare it to the indian teams average of 8.26 Ganguly was struggling while batting against burmuda, and got 3 lifes Ganguly 7 in 23 balls against SL: Harbajan singh went wktless in 2 matches dhoni failed with bat was laughing when he dro[[ed catch t there were not sight in picture which tv channel shown when India lost ot SL all other players are in tears Tendulkar scored a duck, Ganguly 7 in 23 balls and Yuvraj 6? Dhoni 0?( match against srilanka) zahirkahn was wktless in firest match and in he took 2 wkts against SL but he gave more extra runs b'cuz of erratic bowling. VC captain sachin failed completely with bat coz the players who played all 3 matchs Except dravid munaf yuvraj nobody has shown commitment?
