Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Greed, Fame & Politics
by Krishna Kashyap on Apr 04, 2007 07:32 AM   Permalink | Hide replies

No matter what Tendulkar or other senior players say, no matter what Chappel says, the fact is that greed, fame and politics have taken over Indian cricket. They no more play for the country. When Tendulkar enters into Indian cricket team he was 16, but these senior players are not willing to give way to youngsters as if there will be no fresh talent after them. Despite of huge pay checks they get indulge in as many endorsements as they can. Players should be banned for signing endorsements and there will be fixed formulae based on past 5 to 7 performances to evaluate a player, no matter how big 'star' he may be.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:Greed, Fame & Politics
by Lotiya Pathan on Apr 04, 2007 07:57 AM   Permalink
sachin,dravid,ganguly will serve indian cricket for another two years, no matters what chappel bark.. there are very few who would be called for replacement for these trio.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Greed, Fame & Politics
by Bhaskar Chattopadhyay on Apr 04, 2007 07:41 AM   Permalink

While I hold no brief on behalf of Tendle, tell us have you got a better batsman/player who could replace Sachin/Sourav/Dravid? I mean, today?

Give that player and throw Sachin out. Till that time, keep your mouth shut.

You know the problem? Problem is, it needs to be gradual change. However autocratic Chappel messed up instead of helping making that gradual change.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Greed, Fame & Politics
by Krishna Kashyap on Apr 04, 2007 07:49 AM   Permalink
Bhaskar, seems you have already lost all hopes. You are asking for replacement without giving the due faith and trust a youngster may require. It's like as you would not let your son enter into a pool untill he learns swimming. I agree with you, it has to be a gradual change but here you see we're carrying the same old team for last many years without seeing any more great performances from them. We need to take evaluate their performances in last few games not the overall that gives true picture.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Greed, Fame & Politics
by Bhaskar Chattopadhyay on Apr 04, 2007 07:55 AM   Permalink

no..no..I am all for new players. Tendle, Sourav, or even Gavaskar was new at one time.

But as we play cricket round the year, it needs a thorough planning to induct a youngster(s).

2 Much pressure can destroy their career.

That long term planning was surely missing from what Chappel & Co in last 2 years.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Greed, Fame & Politics
by Krishna Kashyap on Apr 04, 2007 08:05 AM   Permalink
Thanks for understanding. Actually we tend to remove youngsters with just one or two bad performance (Raina, Venugopal, Gambhir, Balaji...if you remember) while we dare to touch star players. For example we preferred Agarkar over Sreesanth and in a way we killed his confidence and passion to some extent. We need to have faith in these youngsters and the yardstick should be same for all the players on the basis of last few numbers of performances.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Greed, Fame & Politics
by Bhaskar Chattopadhyay on Apr 04, 2007 08:12 AM   Permalink
he..he..That's why Chappell is there and not you/me.

Its his job to understand relative strength/weakness of each player, and chalk out a future plan which will have some fall back option as well.

NOBODY CAN KEEP ON LOOSING AT PRESENT SAYING WE WILL WIN IN FUTURE:)-

Nobody will allow that.

That's where he failed miserably.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
How is Chappell responsible?