Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Djoker
by kaushik saha on Aug 04, 2008 09:52 AM   Permalink | Hide replies

What abt those now who were already saying Djoker is the best hardcourt player when he defeated Emperor Rafa?

So Murray is the best player on HCs now?

Jealous Fed-Ex fans - grow up - Emperor Rafa is here to stay and rule

Tell your uncle to retire (like Borg) and spend time with his fatty girlfriend milking Juliet

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:Djoker
by Madguy on Aug 04, 2008 10:55 AM   Permalink
Good Reply kaushik. People really dont know to admire talent and hard work. They are just jealous of rise of Rafa.

Way to go Rafa.. keep it up :)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Djoker
by rana basu on Aug 04, 2008 10:04 AM   Permalink
cant call nadal an emperor. he lacks any grace (playing style, looks , name it) that befits that title. but rustics like you may always look up to him as your emperor.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Djoker
by karthikeyan s on Aug 04, 2008 10:13 AM   Permalink
Its really pathetic that people are talking bad about FedEx even after proving himself a lot..

Lets wait for 1 more year...we will come to know who's the best...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Djoker
by Atish Narlawar on Aug 04, 2008 10:28 AM   Permalink
Stop this nonsense hopes.....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:Djoker
by PUNEESH on Aug 04, 2008 10:49 AM   Permalink
well mr saha....nadal might be your favourite player...but dont say bad things about a player who has won dominated tennis for 4 and half years and has been no 1 for record weeks...talking about nadal....he might have won wimbledon this time(deservingly) but that does not mean he is a world beater...we will soon see what he can do on hard courts.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Djoker
by Guest on Aug 04, 2008 10:40 AM   Permalink
Mr Kaushik Ji,
Winning one match or losing one match doesn't make any body winner or loser. In order to be great he has to maintain consistency in all aspects of the game for a while like Federer.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Djoker
by V S on Aug 04, 2008 09:56 AM   Permalink
Let Nadal stay Number 1 for 4 years then we'll see.

The way Nadal plays I dubt he will survive in the long run at number 1.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Djoker
by parthasarathy sarathy on Aug 04, 2008 11:40 AM   Permalink
All those who are arguing exclusively for Federer or Nadal are missing the main point, as they are biased. The main point is that this era of Tennis is witness to a great rivalry between two accomplished champions, Federer already certainly a very very accomplished champion and Nadal trying to get into that elite club. The 1980 Wimbledon final between Borg and McEnroe was the first W Final telecast live in India and I wantched that on TV. At the end of the match, what emerged was a very great rivalry between a gifted young brash American and a cool, icy Swede who had already proved himself beyond doubt with too many French and Wimbledon titles. Similarly, Fedex - Nadal is a great clash and they are lighting up the courts. Nadal has shown that he has the ability to beat Federer or push him very hard (like last year's W Final). What is sad is that Federer is not losing only to a Nadal or a Djokovic but to all and sundry below them also, and on different surfaces. Hope he captures back his old magic and Nadal improves further on hard courts and grass. That's the Tennis that I would like to watch

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
Murray wins first Masters Series title