Difference between Thakarey and Modi is that Modi stands for Bharat and Thakarey only stands for Maharastrians of OBC castes. Thakarey is in the same league as Karunanidhi (supporter of only lower caste Tamils), Lalu and Mulayam Yadav (supporter of only Yadav caste), Sonia (supporter of only minorities), Rajnath Singh (master manipulator), Gawda (the farming community speaking Kannada), Sharad Pawar (leder of of only the Maratha caste). Modi on the other hand is different. He is the leader of all patriotic Indians irrespective of their caste and language. Modi is a histortic, revolutionary figure in India. He is the only leader with guts, boldness and ethics. Modi Rocks!
RE:Narendra Modi is a revolutionary
by prakash on Dec 24, 2007 01:17 AM Permalink
Modi support only his own chamchas. So he is no way different than Thakarey, Karunanidhi, Lalu , Sonia etc. He can not be a historic leader because history will punnish him very soon for spoiling true Hinduism. He has guts and boldness but no ethics like any power hungry dictator. Modi is not a rock but a deceiving ice piece which will disappear with time. Kumar Puttar, better you search for a right person as your hero, Beta !
