if u had been brave u wouldn't have been a muslim or if your forefathers had been brave either you had been a hindu or had not born at all, since they would have accepted death to conversion, but since you are born and are here spitting venom says all about your forefathers and your charecter. go and find out more about history it took just few decades to massacare and convert the whole of middle east at the same time numerous expeditions to india were proved to be very very disatrous for the muslims and only after 500 years (500 years man) could they manage to make their way in india that too with unfair war practices...that is ur greatness...see the rajputs, their women performed jauhar, men saka, but never ever let their honour suffer and that is the reason all these islamic invasions which anniliated the native culture of the middle east could not even destrory an iota of our culture.......see sikhs the religions very birth is right at the door step of the invasion route, their gurus sacrificed their life but did not accept islam and finally kicked ur asses...that is bravery man that is culture...but i guess your genes are differe
RE:@king
by Palani on May 18, 2008 12:25 PM Permalink
@ sahara, What you know about history? What is the basis for your message? can you give authenticated historical reference? Dont give some reference from british writer. What was your language before muslims come and name this country as Hindustan? You neve know what is history is. can you communicate to common man without using Arabic or persian words?
RE:@king
by Palani on May 18, 2008 12:18 PM Permalink
most of the under developed brains talk tha muslims looted them muslims converted them with force. By saying this those undeveloped or sick brains defame the fore fathers. A looter will loot and run. he will not live with you more over he will not sit on your head and rule you. now the muslim population is 20 percent. during independance 12% during british rule they were less than 10%. as per this proportion during muslim rule they may be 5 to 8%. this 8% muslim using force on 92% and ruling. dont you feel shame to say this? are the forfathers were so dead brain or coward to let this 8% rule the 92%. there were Kingputras so and so etc etc..... were they sucking their thumb while the 8% rule the 92%. Dont defame ancestors. During the muslim regime the rules were living friendly with their citizens. They developed their education governmental systes. they helped to develop devanagay language and there by Hindi. Untill now your language is not clear. you have to borrow words from arabic or persian languages for your own communications
RE:@king
by Sahara on May 18, 2008 12:38 PM Permalink
8% can rule 92% if the 92% are further divided in 1000 differnt groups and one group not supporting other..did ur muslims ever fight with whole of india as one unit??....can any muslim country in today's time win a war against india?...pakistan (again may be 10% of india's population) tried many times...what happened...mughals attacked marathas with 8 times bigger army that too more advanced than the marathas what happened?....dont cook up this 8% madarssa theory... your 8% always fought with less than 1% at any given time......when prithviraj chauhan fought his own father in law did not support him...same goes with rana sanga and rana pratap singh...................
but this 8% theory suits isreal which did take on your 92% and won!!
RE:@king
by Palani on May 18, 2008 12:49 PM Permalink
you better take Kahani ghar gharki and saas bi bahu thee. maratas were not there before. all came after mughal teach you some knowldge. tell them what was marata's governing system? did they have any system of culture? tell me one authenticated marata literature which was more than 500 years old. Still India is using some mughal system in Government offices. Taluk- can you tell what is the correct word for taluk in hindi or marati? Tehsil firqa jama bandi
RE:@king
by Falcon on May 18, 2008 12:21 PM Permalink
Sahara
You said foreparents would have accepted death to converstion,,,,,,
Whats this logic man if somebody coming to you and guiding you the right do you accept it or you say ill about it.....???
By the way Islam was spread by proof and evidence, in the case of those who listened to the message and responded to it.
So whoever didn't respond they keep on worshiping idols and following their own faiths...
Finally i would say that we are very much thankful to our ancestors that they willingly accepted the true religion and we feel pride to follow their footsteps.
RE:@king
by Palani on May 18, 2008 12:21 PM Permalink
these dead brains say that muslims demoplished the temples. 8% muslim demolishing the temples of 92% people and the people were looking on to it without have any selfrespect. only now for the past half century people started to realise it. How shame is this to say that ancestors simply keeping quiet when a small number of people just destroyed the places of worship.
Few temples have been demolished on the request of citizens. Because the temple should be places of worship and must not be porno teaching places. Brother and sister , father and daughter , son and mother family members together can not go for worship because the first look in front of the entrance will be idol of girls naked with dogs donkeys and more people were filling the naked holes. dont you feel it would be embarassing for a family to see such things. so the 8% helped the 92% for a better living
