Keeping other countries in a perputal state of suscpicion is another of China's strategic conspiracy.
I fail to understand the Mr. Raman toeing the reason for Tawang belonging to China. By the same token of spiritual extrapolation most of Central and Far East Asia should belong to India since Budhism was born in India. Or, likewise all territories from Georgia to Ulan Bator should belong to Bagdhad, Riyad or Istanbul!
All that Glitters may not be Gold , Mr. Raman. Empires often display their ill-gotten wealth pompously to conceal the darkness within. We have seen brutality glorified in the ampitheatres of Rome, the gory World Wars in a "nothing more to conquest 20th century Europe" or a the Giant Killing Japan; and an overwhelming fear in our software streamlined societies of today.
Please do not go overboard in singing paens of what is actually decadent and morally hollow.These glittering symbols are the minimum they have done counter their own alter ego that questions their hypocracy since their Cultural Revolution. And it is the same with all nations that aspire to build a showcase beyond compare - Paris, New York, Hong Kong, Dubai or Mumbai.
RE:Mr. Raman and the Chinese
by Devaiah Palekanda on May 13, 2008 10:42 AM Permalink
You are right Pradip. Let Not Mr raman go by what he has been shown by his close chibnse freinds. There are so many inter contrdictions inside China , a day will come soon when it will go the USSR way. Then i will talk to Mr Raman.
Also Germany got disintegrtaded after Berlin Olympics, USSR got disintegrated after Moscow Olympics. Now its the chinese turn,. Are they going for a hattrick?????
RE:Mr. Raman and the Chinese
by sibby mathews on May 13, 2008 11:23 AM Permalink
For an Indian, talking sacrosanctly about the 'darkness within' any other society is immediately analogous to the pot calling the kettle black.
RE:RE:Mr. Raman and the Chinese
by Manish Shah on May 14, 2008 04:53 PM Permalink
Xian,
If China (& Chinese /Tibentians) have a problem in accepting Tawang as a part of India because one of the Dalai Lama's was born there, how can they accept Buddhism as a religion itself, since it was born in India?
RE:Mr. Raman and the Chinese
by omkar janardhan dubey on May 17, 2008 10:50 AM Permalink
Well said Mr.Manish & now Mr.XianYe do you have an answer for this?Or have you gone to Pakistan to ask them to reply for you?
RE:Mr. Raman and the Chinese
by Ramesh Kumar on May 17, 2008 10:56 AM Permalink
I am sure XianYe would not want to answer this question what with Chinese thinking which is highly focussed as compared to "muddled" Indian thinking...
