RE:Namaste , shake hand and kati bulli
by Ananda Mahalingam on Mar 31, 2008 05:49 PM Permalink
what a nut you are!!, if it applies to muslims, what about jews, christians, and many other non muslims who get circumsised, medically its proven circumsision is preferable for hygenie and prevents skin cancer!!!
no religion is bad, it is the hate filled fanatics who are the problem.
RE:Namaste , shake hand and kati bulli
by JGN on Mar 31, 2008 05:57 PM Permalink
circumsision was practiced as a result of scarcity of water in the arabian desert. The koran even tells its followers to clean themselves "with mud or sand" before attending prayer "if they get polluted" by touching woman, etc.
There is no need for such practice in places where water is abundant.
RE:RE:Namaste , shake hand and kati bulli
by its me on Mar 31, 2008 05:54 PM Permalink
Don't try to justify act of stupidity with the word /medically/, /scincetifically/. Natural thing is not unhygenic stupid. the skin is given for protection of lower soft skin
RE:RE:RE:Namaste , shake hand and kati bulli
by Ananda Mahalingam on Mar 31, 2008 06:00 PM Permalink
dude, why do you cut natal cord of baby, its natural??
RE:RE:RE:RE:Namaste , shake hand and kati bulli
by its me on Mar 31, 2008 06:19 PM Permalink
according to scientific journals we are using 1% of our brain. you can remove your 99%brain load. Kuch halka ho jayega
RE:RE:RE:RE:Namaste , shake hand and kati bulli
by JGN on Mar 31, 2008 06:04 PM Permalink
Ananda Mahalingam, your questions are irrelevant. If the fore-skin was not required, the same might have been eleminated during the process of evolution.
It is a proven fact that the same is required for maintaining the sensivity of the portion it covers.
