Most of the congressmen r very opportunists, dishonest and money minded. They do not have any principles. Hence, if someone from dynasty is not heading them, they start street fighting. That was the reason, that after Sonia became the president, they stopped fighting.
This has given unprecedented power to the Sonia parivar now. Only people who matter in the party r Sonia, Rahul, Priyanka and her small children in the waiting. All others, including dummy PM MMS r just without any power. There is no internal democracy in the party. All major decisions r taken by Sonia. All appointments in states and center r through nomination by Sonia and not by election.
This is very dangerous for the country. It is good for people like Quatrochies only, who was freed from Argentina jail on our independence day last year, as CBI was forced not to provide enough proof against him. Earlier the Sonia govt allowed defreezing of the bank accounts of Quatrochi.
It is luck that even though both Congress (145/540) and BJP (137/540) were rejected by the people, Sonia is in power due to post poll opportunistic alliance with its enemies like left (congress's enemy in WB, Keral and Tripura), DMK (who r said to b friendly to Rajiv killers), NCP etc. in the name of keeping the 'communal' forces away. 'Communal' NDA gave us Dr Kalam as the president and what has 'secular' forces given us?
UPA and left r appeasing fundamental muslims by saving Afzal and harassing secular Muslim woman Taslima.
RE:No internal democracy in Congress. They r communal also
by Pop Head on Mar 26, 2008 09:58 PM Permalink
They prevented national shame - Gujurat riots. They made a Sikh the PM. That's the short list.
According to you, it is OK for BJP to come to power piggybacking on allies, but absoletely wrong for the Congress to do so. This double standard is why BJP and their supporters are considered the biggest hypocrites in the country
RE:No internal democracy in Congress. They r communal also
by Ram Sharma on Mar 26, 2008 10:12 PM Permalink
What did Congress prevent in Gujrat is not clear. They did not make Sikh a PM. They have made Sikh a dummy PM, without any power whatsoever. All power is in the hands of Sonia parivar.
BJP or Congress, both have right to come to power with their allies. But Congress & Left r each others' only enemy in WB, Tripura and Keral. Allies generally r those, who form pre poll alliance. Present govt was formed with post poll alliance between warring parties.
I do not have anything to say about BJP supporters. I vote as per my conscience. I had been voting Congress, Left and BJP in different elections. Internal democracy was killed in Congress by Indira in 1975.
RE:RE:No internal democracy in Congress. They r communal also
by Tera Baap on Mar 26, 2008 10:14 PM Permalink
BJO made Abdul Kalam President and he was nothing more than e puppet!
RE:RE:RE:No internal democracy in Congress. They r communal also
by Ram Sharma on Mar 26, 2008 10:36 PM Permalink
Presidents r always puppets. But in case of Dr Kalam, he was loved by the youth of the country. He was not a political person and was favoured by the educated people to b reelected. But congress gave us a very faithful & sycophant congresswoman as the next president.
RE:No internal democracy in Congress. They r communal also
by Ram Sharma on Mar 26, 2008 10:34 PM Permalink
In India anyone speaking on behalf of Hindus r called communal, anyone speaking in favour of fundamental Muslims and other minorities r called secular. This is the tragedy of the Indian intellectuals. For them harassing a secular muslim woman Taslima is not an issue.
RE:No internal democracy in Congress. They r communal also
by Ram Sharma on Mar 26, 2008 10:44 PM Permalink
Hindus r the most secular people in the world. If Muslims also learn to b secular from their Hindu brothers, many communal issues will not b there at all in the country.
