RE:China and Tibet
by patriot on Mar 26, 2008 12:35 AM Permalink
you are a terrorist for wanting to hang me.
Go read up the history of negotiations between Britain and China. This was way before 1949. Britain took part of Tibet and incorporated that into India. It belongs to China.
RE:China and Tibet
by Vishnu Sharma on Mar 26, 2008 12:33 AM Permalink
Shut up you chinese agent. Your logic is moronic. Even Japanese look oriental. That does not mean Japan should be part of china.
RE:China and Tibet
by patriot on Mar 26, 2008 12:40 AM Permalink
you are moron. My argument is that Tibetans and Tawang people are Chinese. They should be part of China rather than India because their racial make up is Chinese not Indian. But it seems that it would be hard for you to understand given your substandard education.
RE:RE:China and Tibet
by Indian Analyst on Mar 26, 2008 01:10 AM Permalink
Patriot, SriLankans look like indians and have originated from India. Does this mean that India owns you ??? Sri Lankans have a distinct history, culture and country, Just like tibetans. There is no question of Tibet being part of India. Culturally it feels closer to India, thats all.
RE:China and Tibet
by sasidhar v on Mar 26, 2008 12:35 AM Permalink
Where u have read Britain and china had some deal ? China got independence in 1949 after india. So no question of dealing with britain for border issues. Also Karnataka was formed in 1956. So the karnataka was ruled by manu rulers in the past like mauryans Ashoke. By writing without knwoing facts and name u look like jihadi type.
RE:RE:China and Tibet
by patriot on Mar 26, 2008 12:36 AM Permalink
The Simla Convention of 1914 In 1914, representatives of China, Tibet and Britain negotiated a treaty in India: the Simla Convention. During the convention, the British tried to divide Tibet into Inner and Outer Tibet. When negotiations broke down over the specific boundary between Inner and Outer, the British demanded instead to advance their line of control, enabling them to annex 9,000 square kilometers of traditional Tibetan territory in southern Tibet i.e Tawang region, which corresponds to the north-west parts of modern Indian state of Arunachal Pradesh, while recognizing Chinese suzerainty over Tibet[71] and affirming the latter's status as part of Chinese territory, with a promise from the Government of China that Tibet will not be converted into a Chinese province.[72][73] Tibetan representatives signed without Chinese approval, more so as an act of defiance now that the Chinese army had left; after the collapse of Chinese authority in Tibet in 1912. China maintains that it was signed under British pressure; however, the representative of China's central government declared that the secretive annexation of territory was not acceptable. The boundary established in the convention, the McMahon Line, was considered by the British and later the independent Indian government to be the boundary; however, the Chinese view since then has been that since China, which had suzerainty over Tibet, did not sign the treaty, the treaty was meaningless, and the annexation and control
RE:RE:RE:China and Tibet
by patriot on Mar 26, 2008 12:37 AM Permalink
so according to the above, Britain annexed a part of Tibet which is a part of China. That annexed part is in AP today.
RE:China and Tibet
by sasidhar v on Mar 26, 2008 12:34 AM Permalink
Where u have read Britain and china had some deal ? China got independence in 1949 after india. So no question of dealing with britain for border issues. Also Karnataka was formed in 1956. So the karnataka was ruled by manu rulers in the past like mauryans Ashoke. By writing without knwoing facts and name u look like jihadi type.
