India did not occupy Kashmir. Hari Singh signed an instrument under which he sought India's intervention when attacked by Pakistan. Dalai Lama is no Hizbul commander. Dalai Lama does not operate a terrorist camp in India. He runs a temple, the refugees are educated and unlike Hizbul commander Dalai Lama has been awarded Nobel peace prize for non-violence. India's action can be best described as "not serving its own interest". Tibet is a vital buffer zone between India and China. By taking hands off approach India acts submissive and they seem all set to nod in affirmative to the Chinese claim of Arunachal Pradesh. Respecting Mr.Raghavan's thought, I must say I wholesome don't agree with you although in the passing I must say, you sound more like Chinese arguing in the interest of China.
RE:Tibet is no Kashmir!
by ghanchakker on Mar 25, 2008 11:21 AM Permalink
even Palestine leader Yasser Arafat was given Noble Prize!Noble Prize is a to propagate CAPALISTS VIEWS AND AMERICAN VIEWS!
