This man is probably the best man to have happened to India. He is less a politician and more a principled man. Why can't we Indians WANT TO have a strong leader for our country instead of weaklings like Mr sleepless-over-terrorist?
As far as the jinnah statement is concerned, I still wonder what is wrong in what Advani said. He claimed jinnah to be secular which is a 100% true fact. Whether jinnah was the cause of partition or whether nehru/gandhi was the same is not the point here. How good or bad a human being jinnah was is also not in contention here. The simple question is: WAS JINNAH SECULAR? The simple answer is: YES. Remember that he made pakistan a secular state although he used islam's name to create the state.
RE:Hmm
by Kumar on Mar 21, 2008 11:33 PM Permalink
Kaushik Das worry about the sorry state of Bihar and how to fix it before worrying about the world problems. This is the core issue with Bihar and Biharis, they don't care what happens in their villages and localities and would discuss what happens in rest of India and Somalia.
