Either you are a hidden Islamic criminal under the hindu name or a donkey. First of all let me reply you that I am from Kolkata only, and my ancestral place is Bagnan (in Howrah Distt.) In Howrah %u2013 Kharagpur line. I suspect you are also of Islamic criminality otherwise you would have written the consequence when a Muslim girl marries to a non-Muslim boy. This does not permit me otherwise I would have given the detail. Ironically you did not mention about the fil BOMBAY also forget about the real facts. If you are from Kolkata, then why did not mention about the other girls, who were non-Muslims. What relationship that Rizwan had with the girl, a relationship of teacher and student (Guru-Shisya). You are basically a hidden Islamic criminal that is why you tried to encourage polygamy, as that Islamic criminal Rizwan had relationship with more than one girl. By the way where were you when the bunch of Islamic criminals (your Bangla Bhai) were ransacking your own (if it is really your own and you are also not sneaked from neighbour country) Kokata on Talseema Nasreen issue. Have you read the history of our great country, including the world history especially the history of Islamic criminality i.e. JIHAD. You can never be originally from this great country and forget about WB.
You people are dangerous for this great country.
I invite the comments from real patriots and real Indians.
RE:To Gautam Sinha
by Gautam Sinha on Mar 14, 2008 12:37 AM Permalink
Why does one need to be of Islamic mentality to challenge posts of people who claim to be from Bengal but do not have an iota of values on that? For Rizwan, is he the only tutor and student love relationship? Yes, I also support we should not mix business with pleasure but that is a personal opinion and definitely not meant for value judgement in selective marriages particularly if it is inter religious? So according to you Rizwan was Casanova, so what? Todi's daughter didnt know Rizwan or what before eloping? Whatever decision was their individual decision and not subject to scrutiny by people who want to see it as some Hindu-Muslim-matrimony-therefore-country-in-danger philosophy. I have read of attrocities in names of religion and I think they are horrid but I definitely do not need to see Hindu Muslim relations only from that angle. And what are you talking about some movie in your argument for? Is it even a valid point? FYI Bangla Bhai was caught by Bangladeshi govt and hanged but he preached intolerance just like you are doing. Your post tries to be pre assumptious of why the marriage occured, then it assumes what could have happened, etc and uses these assumptions to justify a crime in our IPC called aiding and abetting sucide? If we do not respect Indians and the law who will? Please be sensible when you post, your arguments oscilate between paranoia and hatred
