Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Discovery of India
by Neel Reddy on Mar 10, 2008 10:41 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

His great grandfather discovered India. Some of the congress-discovered facts: 1)Vedas were written in Iran 2) Saraswathi river was in Afghanistan 3) Ancient cities like Kasi must have been in Europe, from where 100 people migrated to India and invaded its billion people 4) Samudra means a small countryside lake 5) Rama never constructed a bridge, but Noah built an arc 6) Indian civilization started after Gajin invaded it.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:Discovery of India
by Bob Marley on Mar 10, 2008 10:55 PM   Permalink
So
1. Who wrote the vedas
2. Where is saraswati
3. Who are the indegeneous people of India (as the harrappans are now all pakis)
4. How can monkeys build a bridge (because if it is true then we can outsource our construction to them)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Discovery of India
by Neel Reddy on Mar 10, 2008 11:12 PM   Permalink
1) Vedas were not "written" down. They are Apourusheyas, meaning "not from Men". They were not written, but orally transmitted. Before Vyasa compiled them, they were never written down.

2)The mighty Saraswathi river flowed in India, which dried up later, which is a well-established fact.

3) What do you mean? The ancient India included Pakistan, Afghanistan, Kambodia, Mangloia, Singapore and Malaysia. So the indigenous people came from all of these countries.

4) If an Arc can carry samples of all billions of species of life out of deluge, then why cannot monkeys build a bridge? Maybe they are Neanderthals from the not so distant fast.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:Discovery of India
by someone on Mar 10, 2008 11:12 PM   Permalink
The answer is:
We the Sanatanis wrote Vedas somewhere in Punjab/Gandhar area, maybe 10000 years back.
Saraswati river disappeared, because of some possible devastating Earthquakes in the North India.
We were always the Sanatanis who lived in the Sanatansthan (Bharatbhumi).
Because of the Geographical conditions prevailing the timeline of Ramayana, the sea might have been less deep, so setu-construction might have been possible with stones.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Discovery of India
by Bob Marley on Mar 10, 2008 11:25 PM   Permalink
That is my point. The people who actually wrote the vedas (Punjab/Gandhar area) took to Islam and now live in Pakistan.

Dont forget the oldest known civilization on the subcontinent was in Pakistan (Indus Valley). Nothing which predates the Indus Valley has ever been found in India.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:Discovery of India
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Mar 10, 2008 10:47 PM   Permalink
He was self-proclaimed last English man in India!

Guess what, today's rising India, economy 3rd largest, do NOT want to copy west, but wants to chart its own course.

naturally, Nehruvian ideologies are dead.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:Discovery of India
by satyarthi on Mar 10, 2008 11:06 PM   Permalink
Netaji had to leave congress and India due to Nehruji.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:Discovery of India
by madhur prabhakar on Mar 10, 2008 10:59 PM   Permalink
If you can do a better job, why dont u try ur hands in politics instead of cribbing about what his ancestors did....and as far as history is concerned gandhis dont write history, historians do....dont blame whole congress, blame the indian scholars instead who cant prove all these facts wrong....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
I am not on a Discover India tour: Rahul