Muslims Rulers were very secular and have given rights to everyone without any reservation. Thats is the reason why We, the Indian people, did not revolt or overthrow Muslim Governments, as we have done with the Britishers. It shows clearly that PEOPLE WERE HAPPY AND CONTENT.
If one reads the History with unbiased mind, will find out that our Ancestors were known to be generous and Just. See around you, Tajmahal, RedFort, QutubMinar, Charminar and various other Tourist attractions that still contributes to nation's revenue until today. Isnt it amazing ??
As far as BJP/RSS/VHP are concerned, they are the biggest threat to our Nation.
RE:RE:The Fact
by Another Indian on Mar 07, 2008 02:19 PM Permalink
Yeah, mughal leaders where so secular they had jisiya tax. They destroyed 5000 temples. All these are secular acts of mughals. By the way Shivaji was best friend of aurangazeb. People were happy and content with mughal rule that they started supporting british when they invaded.
RE:The Fact
by Ashok Gupta on Mar 07, 2008 02:32 PM Permalink
Pl. dont fool yourself and others.History is a record of the past and good or bad it must be accepted. One can learn and not repeat the bad our ancestors did - no need to feel guilty either since the living generation did not commit those acts. Why are you trying to hide what are facts - accept it and say sorry if you must on behalf of your ancesors but dont deny.
RE:RE:The Fact
by Kiran K on Mar 07, 2008 03:00 PM Permalink
Secular(?) Aurangjeb murdered following people 1] Dara Shukoh his own brother 2] Muajjam his own brother 3] MirjhaRaje Jaisingh his own sardar 4] Dilerkhan his own sardar 5] Guru Tegh Bahadur 6] Bhai Matidas 7] Two innocent children of Guru Govindsingh 8] Chahtrapati Sambhaji
Secular(?) Aurangjeb destroyed following temples 1] Kashi Vishwanath temple two times 2] Mathura KrishnaMandir 3] other 3000 thosand temples.
Secular Aurangjeb fought with Marathas for 26 years from 1682 to 1707 staying at Khuldabad but could not capture Maratha territory. As soon as he died, Maratha captured all area upto Delhi till 1740. Maratha captured Delhi, Lahore, Rawalpindi in 1760 to 1762. Secular(?) Muslim rulers thrown by Hindu Rulers.
RE:The Fact
by kishore baliga on Mar 07, 2008 07:00 PM Permalink
By the Last Sentence colclusion, u have itself given an indication that u urself are pretty secular, why u have not mention SIMI/ISI/AIJC ( All India Jihad Commitee ), what ever Mughal rulers have given, they have snatched from ths soil itself, and where of utmost Indian origin...
RE:The Fact
by Bharat Engineer on Mar 07, 2008 02:22 PM Permalink
Please get your history right, Mr. Mohammed. Probably your name would've been different, if your ancestors were not forcibly converted to Islam.
RE:The Fact
by ramanag on Mar 07, 2008 02:34 PM Permalink
Aurangzeb executed Tegh Bahadur, the ninth guru of sikhism, for not converting to Islam. Aurangzeb demanded that all Kashmiri brahmins to convert to Islam. In his regin many temples were destroyed and replaced by mosques. Far from being secular he was a fundamentalist.
RE:The Fact
by apurva singh on Mar 07, 2008 02:57 PM Permalink
wow what an idiot. firstly you are from the breed that failed to protect your women form muslims. thts why you are mohd momn. sec, india was in constant turmoil. dimwit, have you heard of rana pratap, sivaji and gobind singh??
RE:The Fact
by mohit gupta on Mar 07, 2008 02:57 PM Permalink
In mughals, the rule of akbar, jahagir and shah jahah was secular one. there was no jaziya for hindus and every religion enjoyed equal rights. on the contraty, before akbar, babar converted/killed lots of indians and started the malpractise of jaziya. Also, after shah jahan, auranzeb again started the oppresion of hindus.
so, in total, mughar empire had both good and bad for india.
after auranzeb, the mughals became weak because of their internal fightings, which britishers took advantage to first capture bengal and then other part of india.
