RE:wrong reason.
by Anil Kumar Gupta on Jun 28, 2008 05:05 PM Permalink
Mr JACOB, What about the pilgrims who dont have facilities near amarnath.. But people like you would have silent if this land would have been transferred to muslims.. Its secularism in India... HA HA HA
RE:wrong reason.
by DAWA JACOB on Jun 28, 2008 02:23 PM Permalink
yes..even to the churches... i add to your comfort...there shuld not be given any permission to build new churches in the city limits...will you like to extend that your mandirs...religion shuld be a very personal issue ,not to be braut on the roads
RE:wrong reason.
by rna on Jun 28, 2008 02:28 PM Permalink
Now it seems u are convinced, It shudnt be on the road, OR in CBD area, but peripheral and suburban will do.....And that area is a remote rustic location out side the city limit...So what will be ur say on this?
RE:wrong reason.
by DAWA JACOB on Jun 28, 2008 03:23 PM Permalink
am still saying the sme thing...no use of forest land...any part of india...if you want to accomodate people travelling...manage the flow of poeople...send smaller batches...a day will come when there will be no formation of ICE SHIVLING...We need to preserve it for future generations...
RE:wrong reason.
by navneet singhania on Jun 28, 2008 02:36 PM Permalink
are there is no any construction on forest land in J&K or within India, are it is bann to construct any building on forest land where no other land is available as the location for yatris suits has only forests
