RE:ISLAM AND HINDUISM...
by All Right on Jun 28, 2008 01:47 PM Permalink
Why Bond?
The J&K government has already decided to allot that land (read the other rediff story "Pilgrims deserve better" which also outlines the 5 star treatment being given to the 100000 Haj pilgrims).. But you choose to believe that the issue is in the court... . FYI the Allahabad high court had ruled against the Haj subsidy in 2006, ... so much so for your penchant for abiding by court decisions...
:-) :-) But any smallest sound made by Hindus is not tolerated by your ilk.... that's very much apparent
RE:ISLAM AND HINDUISM...
by James bond on Jun 28, 2008 01:55 PM Permalink
all right
sure pilgrims deserves beter, and who is stopping them. You guys have ruled us since indepnedence, the problem is created by you and not the monorities. BTW the Allahbad high court is no gospel and the final word of law. No one is against pilgrims so dont blame others for it, as I said you guys just seem to winge n every issue ad blame others for your shortcommings.
RE:ISLAM AND HINDUISM...
by Farooq Khan on Jun 28, 2008 01:58 PM Permalink
FYI Mr. Not so right!
Haj is the only pilgrimage of muslims, while hindus have many pilgrimage to offer (just not only amarnath yatra) if you or author of that illogical article has to compare then add up the amount of all the pilgrimage done (not just amarnath yatra) by hindus every year then compare with Haj
RE:ISLAM AND HINDUISM...
by raj pathak on Jun 28, 2008 01:43 PM Permalink
you are very correct and this is a proven fact. in 1947, in pakistan 20% population was hindu n sikhs no they r less than 2%.... this is an eyeopener for all my pseudo-secular friends
RE:ISLAM AND HINDUISM...
by varghese on Jun 28, 2008 01:50 PM Permalink
INDIA IS AN SECULAR DEMOCRATIC NATION..SHARIA DOESNT WORK HERE..DIVISION BASED UPON RELIGION ISNT ALLOWED HERE..RIGHT TO SELF DETERMINATION DOESNT MEAN U CAN BREAK THE LAND AND TAKE CHUNKS OF IT..J&K IS PART OF INDIA AND WILL NEVER BE FURTHER DIVIDED ON BASIS OF MUSLIMS AND NON MUSLIMS...HISTORICALLY HINDUISM WAS MAJORITY IN J&K..SO IF NOW ISLAM IS IN MAJORITY DOESNT ALTER THE UNITY OF THIS LAND..OCCUPIED KASHMIR(POK) IS FOR MUSLIMS WHO WANT TO DIS-OBEY THE INDIAN LAWS..SO GET BACK THERE THOSE WHO WANT TO OBEY SHARIA..
RE:ISLAM AND HINDUISM...
by Sendhil Kumar on Jun 28, 2008 02:09 PM Permalink
Guys, all this secularism stuff is nothing but sheer bullshit. We indians (especially hindus) are nothing but stupid to let these muslims grow to this extent in the name of secularism. Its time we hindus, set aside all castecreed differences and kick the ass out of these muslim traitors.We need to teach our children that no muslim in India should be tolerated and they should be kicked, keeping aside all these so called stupid secularism values.
RE:RE:ISLAM AND HINDUISM...
by James bond on Jun 28, 2008 01:47 PM Permalink
Wingers , wingers and wingers
one wonders why dont christians, sikhs, muslims or the parsis ever winge. Historically many temples are built on lands given by muslim rulers. Normal hindus and muslims have no diffrences, its only bigots like you that seek to divide them.
If you all have an axe to grind against muslims then go to a hindutva forum with your communal nonsesense and ignorance.
Your odious views suggest that you al think like a terrorista. Disgusting and disgraceful.
RE:ISLAM AND HINDUISM...
by vspi on Jun 28, 2008 01:47 PM Permalink
Gear Guest Ali/ Khan or whatever yur name is, the question here is not abt Un resolution, the question here is abt human values. As Varghese rightly points out why is that why do muslims have double standrads, 1 -when they're in majority- they ask for spl treatment and favoured status (without much contribution) and 2- when in majority they altogether have a different tune to sing? Thats the time their 'islam' gets in danger if somebody tries to build a temple/ Church or Gurudwara in their precints.
