whatever is happining in kashmir is pure Kashmiri nationalism" and it shouldn't be equated with fundamentalism. kashmiries aren't against the Amarnath Yatra - they are only protesting against the land transfer which is pure nationalism not a single yatri has been hurt in kashmir from last one week .Had this type of protests been done by hindu terrist organisations like VHP Bharang Dhal in places like Gujrat etc hundreds of muslims would have been killed. Kashmiries have been denied right of self determination since 1947 which india promised them in UN and is crushinp the public uprising since 1989 in which thousands of innocent kashmiries have been killed by indian (7 lakh )troops and 10000 kashmiries are still missing in custody. and worst form of human rights violations have been done in kashmir for which partially indian media is also responsible which has not brought a tru picture of kashmir
RE:Truth is this
by Rahul Singh on Jun 28, 2008 11:39 PM Permalink
Karhmiri Nationalism is a misnomer. Before 1980 Kashmir was regarded as "Jannat of Earth". Everybody in Kashmir was happy. But once the Muslim fundamentalism taken over the majority of the unemployed musmlim youth, the trouble began. I consider this is purely vested politics. People of Kashmir should wake up from their sleep and look forward to build a strong india where Kashmir is regarded as a Head of India. Look the Pakistan and Bangladesh before going for new country.
RE:Truth is this
by JGN on Jun 28, 2008 11:35 PM Permalink
This is the saga of intolerance: Muhammad died of a fever at the age of 63, with his violent religion now firmly rooted in the Arab lands. Through his teachings, his followers viewed worldly life as a constant physical battle between the House of Peace (Dar al-Salaam) and the House of War (Dar al-Harb).
Over the next fourteen centuries, the bloody legacy of this extraordinary individual would be a constant challenge to those living on the borders of the religion’s hegemony. The violence that Muslim armies would visit on people across North Africa, the Middle East, Europe and into Asia as far as the Indian subcontinent is a tribute to a founder who condoned subjugation, rape, murder and forced conversion in the cause of the spread of his religion.
In Muhammad's words: "I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.' And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them..." (Bukhari 8:387)
It is certainly the basis not just for modern day terror campaigns against Western infidels (and Hindus and Buddhists) but also the broad apathy that Muslims across the world have to the violence, which is an obvious enabler.
As Indonesian cleric, Abu Bakar Bashir recently put it, "If the West wants to have peace, then they have to accept Islamic rule."
RE:Truth is this
by irfan khan on Jun 28, 2008 11:39 PM Permalink
You Idiot, who told you VHP & BHajrang Dal are terrorist orgs. Don't even dream of talking like this when you come talk about our unity with Hindus here in India. We are much safer here in India than being there in your country. Everyday people are being killed, no economy to survive, no future growth plans, no proper infrastructure. Don't talk hell of us like this. Mind your own business, we are much prosperous here. Kashmiris will prosper being part of India than suffer at your hands and mullahs.
RE:Truth is this
by QandA on Jun 28, 2008 11:46 PM Permalink
A Benezir was killed in broad day light. While a Roman Catholic lady called as Sonia Maino rules India..
If VHP/Bajrang Dal were terrorist we know what would have happened to Sonia
RE:Truth is this
by Terminator on Jun 28, 2008 11:33 PM Permalink
We Indians fooled and have been fooling the stupid kashimiris since 1947 on self determination.
