The deal is anti-sovereign as the nuclear scientists are saying. The scientists understand it the best;it's their area. If they say it's no good, Dr MMS doesn't have any right to go against them;that will be anti-nationalistic. BJP's stand is very clear - we can't forget our sovereign rights. I don't see any better word.
RE:Mr Rajnath is right
by Vinay Gupta on Jun 24, 2008 09:26 PM Permalink
it is 100% correct that Jinnah was Nationalist and secular. It was Congress which forced him to take Anti Hindu stand ( read anti national) . In order to prove that he is better political leader than Nehru he took that stand which we in India rightly donot like.
He was definitly a great leader than Nehru and gandhi bcoz he could achieve what he wanted. Unlike gandhi who could not prevent partion!
RE:Mr Rajnath is right
by Prakash Asrani on Jun 24, 2008 09:56 PM Permalink
Vinay, Appears you are staking your claim to PM's post after (and if) Advani becomes PM. Advani (not Asrani) KHUSH HUA with your comments.
RE:Mr Rajnath is right
by sony kalloor on Jun 24, 2008 09:30 PM Permalink
WHat did he achieve dear friend other than a pakistan ! that is the easiest thing that some one can do - divide people on religion in a coutry where less than 20% of population is educated. Ask BJP they will tell you how easy was it to do it. But ask them how easy was it to lay foundation for a sucessful Nation , What happened to pak - end of the day they are a failed state -now hail Jinnah for it , You may hail Advaniji for the violence thats been happening in India after his infmous rath yatra.
RE:Mr Rajnath is right
by Vinay Gupta on Jun 24, 2008 09:40 PM Permalink
he could successfully devide but why cannot Gandhi successfuly unite people? We have to accept the failure. We shouls accept that in Congress no one opoosing Gandhi Nehru was alowed to remain in party. See what treatment was given to Bose, Patel Ambedkar etc. This no democracy. It is no greatness
