Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Moon myth
by rgopi on Jun 20, 2008 03:11 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

By the way the NASA's Moon landing by Neil Armstrong et al during Nixon's time was a huge fake. This was to gain a step over Russia's sputnik and to better Nixon's presidency over his water gate scandal's. The moon images were taken in Nevada desert. It is physically impossible to land on the Moon because of so many constraints of pressure and temperature. The pressure of the Van Allen's belt will crush the rocket. Landing is based on natural gravity and hence landing is near impossible. Kindly research the terms Moon Landing Fake. Nixon was the greatest fraud of the previous century.

Only one set of people have landed on the moon so far.

Tintin, captain Haddock, Snowy, prof calculus, Thomposon twins, Wolff and Jorgensen, see Tintin in explorers of the Moon.

Since it is election time we can land anywhere in the solar system.

By the way moon has several lunar seabeds, so we can expect, Holiday resorts, and IT companies. The real estate prices are expected to sky rocket on the moon, pls book your plot of moon today

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:Moon myth
by Raghu K on Jun 20, 2008 03:21 PM   Permalink
Yes, yes. All your claims are true. Thats why russians themselves acknowledged that USA landed there. And BTW, you were talking about "pressure" on Van Allen belt. Actually, its radiation, not pressure and thats very much within acceptable levels. Otherwise all space mission - including the ones to all other planets by all countries russia, european space agency, etc - would have got crushed, isn't it?

Think logically before accepting any damn theory.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Moon myth
by rgopi on Jun 20, 2008 03:27 PM   Permalink
Boss I dont claim to be an expert on the so called moon landing. Be it radiation or be it pressure,

Pls research more, you find my claims true. Sometimes independent research is more correct than govt statements, this applies to 9/11 as well as the moon landing

Can you show me where the russians acknoledged the same. It was a mission to befool the entire world, and russians are a part of the same.

Who was the other guy besides Armstrong, he is supposedly blurted out that everything was orchestrated,

You start using your brains before crapping



   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Moon myth
by Raghu K on Jun 20, 2008 03:57 PM   Permalink
I have done enough research. Read about space race in wikipedia and you'll find Russians were competing with US. They had to shutdown their program because US reached the moon first. So why would they support US?

Nobody blurted out anything as you mentioned. In fact the "person with Armstrong" - Aldrin - punched a proponent of the conspiracy allegations for calling him a liar.

Now, who's crapping here without even reading about the subject?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:Moon myth
by Brajesh kumar on Jun 20, 2008 03:31 PM   Permalink
Van Allen's Belt is a radiation. However, did you notice flying flag of USA on the moon in any of their photograph?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Moon myth
by rgopi on Jun 20, 2008 03:36 PM   Permalink
yes despite lack of atmosphere
shadow of astronauts irreconcilable with the light source
the stone on which alphabets are scribbled

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Moon myth
by shakti kapooor on Jun 20, 2008 03:46 PM   Permalink
THE SAME PROGRAMME WAS TELEVISED LOT OF TIME ON DISCOVERY CHANNEL.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
India''s mission to moon takes off in Sep