Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Divide and rule
by neelakantan margam on Jun 17, 2008 07:23 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

The DMK and others always played a DRAMA that Brahmins divided people and ruled

No caste No Creed - But they did the same BRITISH - BRAHMIN STRATEGY.. How can you have a VANNIYAR PARTY when there is no caste or creed?.. Folks all talk something and practice that is convenient for being in power and that s it...BAN CASTE BASED PARTIES - BAN STATE/ CREED/LINGUAL BASED STUFF..

The Great Nehru divided Lingually to have a hold on Vote banks..

The one and only agenda for all political parties is "What I will do for the Indians" and How I will raise their per capita income ...nothing else

The agenda ca

    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:Divide and rule
by tamal sarkar on Jun 17, 2008 07:44 PM   Permalink
Absolutely Correct.End this state based parties .They never look at all india scenerios and well being of the country.They alaways look at the interest of the state and not ready to Compromise on any front so wat happens is when the aggreived state gets a chance they also behave the same way that they have been treated when they were at disadvantageous situation .There should be always national party in the goverment who has units in all the states so they will be the bset obne to solve it amicably as all are believing in national ideolgy and under the same party Flag.We should look at the criteria to allow the parties to fight Lok sabha elections .Make that if a party doesnt win atleast 3 % of Votes in atleast 7 states they will loose national Recognition.A party wich doesnt have any recognition even in One fourth of the country should not be counted as a national party.In that Only Three parties will Qualify Congress ,BJP and Communists.I also agree that Congress for its own means have created regionalism and promoted such vendattas that all the others are infected as Viruses. For exple in 1991 Trivandrum changed its name to thiruvananthapuram and then it was under Congress rule but unanimously supported by CPIM party coz vote bank. If that wouldnt have been passed the today Kolkata,chennai,mumbai,bengaluru puducherry wouldnt have been there.Even now the names of thye roads are also being changed though the Unique Bridge was built by Britishers but now named Tagore

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:RE:RE:Divide and rule
by tamal sarkar on Jun 17, 2008 07:49 PM   Permalink
Setu in Kolkata.How rah bridge in Kolkata is called Tagore Setu. Did any Indian built it No.. then why will u name a thing built by britishers after any Indian. Build things on your own and then name after our own countrymen

   Forward   |   Report abuse
  RE:Divide and rule
by neelakantan margam on Jun 17, 2008 09:12 PM   Permalink
You are right - nothing done constructive by any of the politicians.. They could only rename by fanning lingual and caste politics as they wish..

DMK changed ROAD NAMES in Chennai, without caste. Dr Nair road in T Nagar was made Dr Raod - Why did they allow a Vanniar party to thrive if they could not tolerate road names with caste?

Truth will prevail -- Where is INDIAN in this scenario? Its a PITY that what was propogated by great KARUNA was never practised.. I had great fancy for the propoganda 3 decades back..Its only a mirage!!! To me every small move has to get oriented to INDIA and INDIANS..No CASTE, CREED,LANGUAGE or STATE or any other DIVISION

LEADERS - Do it and SHOW it -- enough of your TALL TALK and BULL SHITS!!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
TN: DMK snaps ties with PMK