Rediff.com |  Feedback  
You are here: » Rediff Home » Discussion Boards » Permalink
  
View : Single Message | Complete Thread | Read complete Discussion
Statements on Jehad,Quran,wahhabism
by balaord on Jun 15, 2008 04:50 PM   Permalink | Hide replies

Inadvertently or willingly India is dragged into the conflict engineered by the west.
The greed of West is beneath every occupation and it is this which is cauing havoc on all parts of the world.
Today they have managed to convice the world that London,Spain,Bali and other terrorist activties are because of Quran,even otherwise decent people have failed to note ,it is occupation of Iraq that is the cause of this misery.
The stupidest thing of all,is India didint support this occupation and some how,some one is dragging India into this conflict-Extremists of both side should take the blame.

People should be made aware of this
the british termed even the first independec war of India as a Jehad and muslim fanaticism.Today we have many small time real and fictious characters stealing the glory of the first war of Independence struggle but Muslims bore the brunt of Birtish onslaught on the grounds that Islam is violent and Quran is the reason behind this.
Let us not buy into this western concept of clash of civilizations


    Forward  |  Report abuse
  RE:Statements on Jehad,Quran,wahhabism
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Jun 15, 2008 04:53 PM   Permalink

ITS TERRORISTS WHO QUOTE QURAN.

INSTEAD OF TAKING ON THEM, U MUSLIMS ARE TRYING TO PASS THE BUCK.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
  RE:Statements on Jehad,Quran,wahhabism
by balaord on Jun 15, 2008 04:52 PM   Permalink
How the western media called - The first independence war?Here is the ceturies old scanned copy of Newyork times,published on the eve of that struggle

query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9B02EEDC163CEE34BC4B52DFBE66838C649FDE

It simply reads - A Mahommedan Conspiracy for the Sovereignty of India
There was no Mangel Pandey,No amir khans dramtizations,it was treated as Muslim fanaticims and muslims bore the brunt of british onslaught

Now see how they used the term Wahabbiism during that time ,when a Muslim assasinated the governor general of then india,instead of occupation,the world media talked about wahabi evils.
Here is the century old article from Newyork times

query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9C01E7D9113EEE34BC4B52DFB4668389669FDE


How british used the term jehad to conceal their imperialistic designs during India's struggle for independece
This is again more than a century old editorial from newyork times digital archives

query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9D03E1DD1330E333A25751C1A96F9C94669ED7CF

...THE UPRISING IN INDIA - Book on the Jehad by the Ameer and How Its Meaning Was Distorted...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
The above message is part of the Discussion Board:
Ajmer: The next target of terrorists?