RE:karuna-criminal,street begger in tamilnadu
by THANJAI SIVAN on Jun 10, 2008 11:49 PM Permalink
ADMK is not having a brahmin leader. MGR was not a brahmin and Jayalalitha was actually the daughter of Mysore Maharaja. If she is a real brahmin , she wouldnot have made the Sankaracharya run for his life. Jaya is not patronising any brahmin and she is the leader of non brahmins.
RE:RE:karuna-criminal,street begger in tamilnadu
by Tamilan on Jun 11, 2008 09:11 AM Permalink
Idot PrabaKaran, read the first message of SS, he is telling all the high post in India should be given to Brahmins only and not others. Still you want to be fool.
We are Dravidians, we should send those people out of our country.
RE:RE:RE:karuna-criminal,street begger in tamilnadu
by prakash mohanasundaram on Jun 11, 2008 12:55 PM Permalink
Hope sanity is restored amongst ourselves. This Dravidian vs Aryan, Brahmin vs Non Brahmin stuff does not seem to end. Brahmins comprise of 2% of the population in TN.Mostly Brahmins in the past have mainly been priests in temples or maybe astrologers. Where as the Kingdom was not ruled by Brahmins, The businesses in the past were not run by Brahmins, Neither they were warriors. Even in Dravidian History, Brahmins have never ruled a kingdom or province. Then how come Brahmins assert dominance over others. Kingdom, Economy, agriculture etc were in the hands of the so called non-brahmins in the past. Even when zamindari system came into existence, it was the so called non-brahmins who were the main benefactors, so how come Brahminism and Brahmin domination came in to existence? Maybe i am missing a point here i guess cos i dont see any logical explanation for this theory
