Salman Rushdie wrote something against Mohamad in a book published in Britain ,not in India,Muslims started beating and insulting Hindus of India,even when Indian govt had banned this book much before it was released for international market.What is this.What type of these Muslims are Indian,and what type of this humanitarianism is this.In which dictionary,this behaviour of Muslim is called Bhai Chaara or Ganga-Jamuni Tehzeeb.On the other side there are innumberable instance where Hindus have shown example of friendship and brotherhood with Muslims.Hindus crave for the indulgence of Muslims in the country's activites.The biggest exammple is that partition took place o the basis of religion.muslims were 22% but were given 33% of land.Out of 22%,only 15% muslims went to Pakistan and 7% stayed back,and they are now 14% in India.Is it not soft corner in Hindus for their Muslims.On the other hand,there were 20% hindus in west and 30% in east Pakistan.Now there are not even1% and 9%.What does it amount to.But not the fault of muslims.They have been tought like this -Darul Islam and Darul harab.That is why cleansing in J&K and other places of UP and Bengla and Kerala.
The solution probably lies in banning Madrasas and teaching of those portions of quran which instigate violence and hatred.That does not mean if there are such hatred for Muslims in Hindus or Christians or Sikhs religious books,they should not be banned.They should be banned first and then the Muslim.
RE:MUSLIMS-3
by Rupakshi on Jun 05, 2008 10:13 PM Permalink
When the king of Turkey abolished the burkhas, Muslims of India went on rampage and in Kerala they burnt Hindu homes. I read satanic verses, in fact Rushdee was more critical of Hindu beliefs than that of Muslims. But these guys went after innocent Hindus in Bomaby. Just banning something will not change irrationality in to rationality. The whole psyche has to change. What is use of the so many great and good Muslims coming and saying Islam means peace and trying to change the historical facts. In the action they have a responsibility to work with their Nonmuslim brothers towards achieving that goal.
RE:MUSLIMS-3
by Tathagatha Mukherjee on Jun 05, 2008 10:36 PM Permalink
Hindus also killed Sikhs in 1984. Jagdisn Tytler and Bhagwan Dass were held responsible by sikh victims. All were Hindus? Shame Shame...Hindus are killing in Mombai if they from Bihar. Even Vegetable Vendors.
RE:MUSLIMS-3
by JGN on Jun 05, 2008 10:45 PM Permalink
Tathagatha Mukherjee (duplicate), the Anti-sikh riots had nothing to do with any religion. It was sponored by the most "secular" party in India.
RE:MUSLIMS-3
by Omprakash Kumar on Jun 05, 2008 11:50 PM Permalink
But is agree with Mukherjees point...we cannot deny that Jagdish tytler and Bhagwan Dass who organized sikh genocide and staunch Hindus and not atheist?
RE:RE:MUSLIMS-3
by Tathagatha Mukherjee on Jun 06, 2008 01:03 AM Permalink
Google is not even helping me prepare my daily Saambaar SAAR? Why always saying Google Google Saar ? Just same people writing in Google naa? I have to still buy the daal naaa Saar ? Got the point...garbage in garbage out naa
