ALLL THOSE WHO CALLED ME MUSLIM AND NOT HINDU SEE THIS BELOW...
Contradiction 1: ----------------- You mention in your opening letter "Srimann Naaraayana, who is the creator of this Universe is known as Sri Vishnu or Sri Mahavishnu."
In another words Lord Mahavishnu is the creator of this Universe. But,
Later in the closing you mention, "Lord Mahavishnu created the Brahmma through His Naval and appointed Brahmma to create the Universe. Brahmma created the Shiva and made Him as a destroyer. Then the Rishis, Munis (saints and sages) with the paraphernalia of the Brahmma Logam, (Eternal), Bhoologam (Earth) etc were created by Brahmma."
Here I find Brahmma is the creator of this Universe, because he is appointed to create Universe, Shiva, Rishis, Munis, Brahmma Logam, and Earth etc.
Contradiction 2: ----------------- In the Svetavatar Upanishad chapter 3 we find Rudra is Ishwara, Ishwara is the creator (Svetavatara 3: 4 " He, the creator and supporter of the gods, Rudra, the great seer, the lord of all, he who formerly gave birth to Hiranyagarbha, may he endow us with good thoughts")
(Svetavatara 3:7 "Those who know beyond this the High Brahman, the vast, hidden in the bodies of all creatures, and alone enveloping everything, as the Lord, they become immortal")
In the Svetavatar Upanishad chapter 4 it tells us the description of Ishwara as Supreme Brahman and Creator. (Svetavatar Upanishad 4: 12 "He, the creator and supporter of the gods, Rudra, the great seer, the lord
RE:ACCEPTING OPEN CHALLENGE ON VEDAS
by drax on Jun 05, 2008 08:43 PM Permalink
HAHAHAHHA idiot just because you quote a verse or two with the ZERO IQ understanding of Zakir Naik dont think the sheep is not spotted among the tigers. Just the way you respond to posts on Islam is sufficient to reveal your foolish identity.
RE:ACCEPTING OPEN CHALLENGE ON VEDAS
by cooldudelov on Jun 05, 2008 08:45 PM Permalink
ramesh are you educated from Madrass university from Mulla teacher
RE:ACCEPTING OPEN CHALLENGE ON VEDAS
by Ramesh Sinha on Jun 05, 2008 08:39 PM Permalink
continued....
In the Svetavatar Upanishad chapter 4 it tells us the description of Ishwara as Supreme Brahman and Creator. (Svetavatar Upanishad 4: 12 "He, the creator and supporter of the gods, Rudra, the great seer, the lord of all, who saw Hiranyagarbha being born, may he endow us with good thoughts.") (Svetavatar Upanishad 4:13. "He who is the sovereign of the gods, he in whom all the worlds rest, he who rules over all two footed and four-footed beings, to that god let us sacrifice an oblation.")
Contradiction 3: ---------------- In the Rig Veda, a Rishi says, (The wise call Him by different names, they call Him Agni, Yama or Matarswa) According to this mantra, God bears different names, but the confusion emerges when the very gods- Agni, Yama and Matarswa are projected as independent gods. When the Rig Veda has given independent identity to the above mentioned gods, what is the significance of this mantra?
Moreover, nowhere in the Vedas, Agni is called by the name of Yama or vice--versa. Thus, this mantra serves no useful end; it only creates confusion. This is not the only mantra, which creates contradiction.
The Rig Veda (2/1/3-7) calls Agni by the names of Indra, Vishnu, Brahma, Varun, Mitra, Aryaman, Tvastar, Rudra, Pusan, Savitar and Bhag. Thus, this verse also adds to the confusion. If Agni is also Brahma, Vishnu and Indra, why are they accorded with separate godly identity and status? This mantra also suggests that Agni commands more influence as compared to
RE:RE:ACCEPTING OPEN CHALLENGE ON VEDAS
by Ramesh Sinha on Jun 05, 2008 08:41 PM Permalink
Contradiction 5: ------------------ In the Taitirya Samit -( 'Prajapati' is described as the creator of gods and demons, while the Rig Veda (10/72/2) describes Brahmanaspati as the creator of gods. Again the Taitirya Samit) (1/6/9/1; 2/l/21) projects 'Prajapati' as the creator of Yagya and human beings while the Rigveda (1/96/2) says that Agni created human beings. That is why Agni is called the father of human beings.
But Agni has himself been depicted in Rig Veda as taking birth as living creatures. It is also mentioned in the Taitirya Samit(1/5/9/7) that 'Prajapati' created animals; and having the desire to create people he (3/1/1/1) observed penance.
Now there is again a question to be answered by the Taitirya Samit, (it is known that it will not); if 'Prajapati' was Swambhu and the creator, why did he observe penance? If he did, he did to whom? This obviously suggests that there was someone who was superior to 'Prajapati', or like others, 'Prajapati' too was a creation of a religious fallacy and described as a god.
The Vedic scripture presented have contradictory views; it serves only to misguide the people about the creator of the universe.
RE:ACCEPTING OPEN CHALLENGE ON VEDAS
by INDIAN on Jun 05, 2008 08:44 PM Permalink
lol, what is your point ramesh. I nowhere see in any of your comments where rigveda says to kill non-hindus in name of religion. btw, where is the contradiction in indra/agni/yama being called by different names (they are posts - like PM, CM, etc). grow up man, and read true sanskrit verses and not translations donw by macaulay and his sons. BTW, I got it now, you are a hindu, but a brahmin-hater, thats what you are, hence you bring up some non-existing "contradictory" verses and try to confuse people.
